Creating sustainable health care systems: Agreeing social (societal) priorities through public participation

Peter Littlejohns, Katharina Kieslich, Albert Weale, Emma Tumilty, Georgina Richardson, Tim Stokes, Robin Gauld, Paul Scuffham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: In order to create sustainable health systems, many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services underpinned by a process of health technology assessment. While this approach requires technical judgements of clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness, these are embedded in a wider set of social (societal) value judgements, including fairness, responsiveness to need, non-discrimination and obligations of accountability and transparency. Implementing controversial decisions faces legal, political and public challenge. To help generate acceptance for the need for health prioritisation and the resulting decisions, the purpose of this paper is to develop a novel way of encouraging key stakeholders, especially patients and the public, to become involved in the prioritisation process. Design/methodology/approach: Through a multidisciplinary collaboration involving a series of international workshops, ethical and political theory (including accountability for reasonableness) have been applied to develop a practical way forward through the creation of a values framework. The authors have tested this framework in England and in New Zealand using a mixed-methods approach. Findings: A social values framework that consists of content and process values has been developed and converted into an online decision-making audit tool. Research limitations/implications: The authors have developed an easy to use method to help stakeholders (including the public) to understand the need for prioritisation of health services and to encourage their involvement. It provides a pragmatic way of harmonising different perspectives aimed at maximising health experience. Practical implications: All health care systems are facing increasing demands within finite resources. Although many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services, the decisions often face legal, political, commercial and ethical challenge. The research will help health systems to respond to these challenges. Social implications: This study helps in increasing public involvement in complex health challenges. Originality/value: No other groups have used this combination of approaches to address this issue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Health Organization and Management
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Delivery of Health Care
Health
Social Responsibility
Health Services
Ethical Theory
Biomedical Technology Assessment
Health Services Needs and Demand
New Zealand
Research
England
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Making
Community Participation
Public participation
Health care system
Education
Prioritization
Health services
Stakeholders
Accountability

Keywords

  • Evidence-based practice
  • Health services sector
  • Hospital management
  • Inequality
  • National Health Service
  • New Zealand

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Creating sustainable health care systems : Agreeing social (societal) priorities through public participation. / Littlejohns, Peter; Kieslich, Katharina; Weale, Albert; Tumilty, Emma; Richardson, Georgina; Stokes, Tim; Gauld, Robin; Scuffham, Paul.

In: Journal of Health Organization and Management, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Littlejohns, Peter ; Kieslich, Katharina ; Weale, Albert ; Tumilty, Emma ; Richardson, Georgina ; Stokes, Tim ; Gauld, Robin ; Scuffham, Paul. / Creating sustainable health care systems : Agreeing social (societal) priorities through public participation. In: Journal of Health Organization and Management. 2018.
@article{0d11a1bd73f94d9cbdec53a76f962d07,
title = "Creating sustainable health care systems: Agreeing social (societal) priorities through public participation",
abstract = "Purpose: In order to create sustainable health systems, many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services underpinned by a process of health technology assessment. While this approach requires technical judgements of clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness, these are embedded in a wider set of social (societal) value judgements, including fairness, responsiveness to need, non-discrimination and obligations of accountability and transparency. Implementing controversial decisions faces legal, political and public challenge. To help generate acceptance for the need for health prioritisation and the resulting decisions, the purpose of this paper is to develop a novel way of encouraging key stakeholders, especially patients and the public, to become involved in the prioritisation process. Design/methodology/approach: Through a multidisciplinary collaboration involving a series of international workshops, ethical and political theory (including accountability for reasonableness) have been applied to develop a practical way forward through the creation of a values framework. The authors have tested this framework in England and in New Zealand using a mixed-methods approach. Findings: A social values framework that consists of content and process values has been developed and converted into an online decision-making audit tool. Research limitations/implications: The authors have developed an easy to use method to help stakeholders (including the public) to understand the need for prioritisation of health services and to encourage their involvement. It provides a pragmatic way of harmonising different perspectives aimed at maximising health experience. Practical implications: All health care systems are facing increasing demands within finite resources. Although many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services, the decisions often face legal, political, commercial and ethical challenge. The research will help health systems to respond to these challenges. Social implications: This study helps in increasing public involvement in complex health challenges. Originality/value: No other groups have used this combination of approaches to address this issue.",
keywords = "Evidence-based practice, Health services sector, Hospital management, Inequality, National Health Service, New Zealand",
author = "Peter Littlejohns and Katharina Kieslich and Albert Weale and Emma Tumilty and Georgina Richardson and Tim Stokes and Robin Gauld and Paul Scuffham",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/JHOM-02-2018-0065",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Health Organization and Management",
issn = "1477-7266",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Creating sustainable health care systems

T2 - Agreeing social (societal) priorities through public participation

AU - Littlejohns, Peter

AU - Kieslich, Katharina

AU - Weale, Albert

AU - Tumilty, Emma

AU - Richardson, Georgina

AU - Stokes, Tim

AU - Gauld, Robin

AU - Scuffham, Paul

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: In order to create sustainable health systems, many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services underpinned by a process of health technology assessment. While this approach requires technical judgements of clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness, these are embedded in a wider set of social (societal) value judgements, including fairness, responsiveness to need, non-discrimination and obligations of accountability and transparency. Implementing controversial decisions faces legal, political and public challenge. To help generate acceptance for the need for health prioritisation and the resulting decisions, the purpose of this paper is to develop a novel way of encouraging key stakeholders, especially patients and the public, to become involved in the prioritisation process. Design/methodology/approach: Through a multidisciplinary collaboration involving a series of international workshops, ethical and political theory (including accountability for reasonableness) have been applied to develop a practical way forward through the creation of a values framework. The authors have tested this framework in England and in New Zealand using a mixed-methods approach. Findings: A social values framework that consists of content and process values has been developed and converted into an online decision-making audit tool. Research limitations/implications: The authors have developed an easy to use method to help stakeholders (including the public) to understand the need for prioritisation of health services and to encourage their involvement. It provides a pragmatic way of harmonising different perspectives aimed at maximising health experience. Practical implications: All health care systems are facing increasing demands within finite resources. Although many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services, the decisions often face legal, political, commercial and ethical challenge. The research will help health systems to respond to these challenges. Social implications: This study helps in increasing public involvement in complex health challenges. Originality/value: No other groups have used this combination of approaches to address this issue.

AB - Purpose: In order to create sustainable health systems, many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services underpinned by a process of health technology assessment. While this approach requires technical judgements of clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness, these are embedded in a wider set of social (societal) value judgements, including fairness, responsiveness to need, non-discrimination and obligations of accountability and transparency. Implementing controversial decisions faces legal, political and public challenge. To help generate acceptance for the need for health prioritisation and the resulting decisions, the purpose of this paper is to develop a novel way of encouraging key stakeholders, especially patients and the public, to become involved in the prioritisation process. Design/methodology/approach: Through a multidisciplinary collaboration involving a series of international workshops, ethical and political theory (including accountability for reasonableness) have been applied to develop a practical way forward through the creation of a values framework. The authors have tested this framework in England and in New Zealand using a mixed-methods approach. Findings: A social values framework that consists of content and process values has been developed and converted into an online decision-making audit tool. Research limitations/implications: The authors have developed an easy to use method to help stakeholders (including the public) to understand the need for prioritisation of health services and to encourage their involvement. It provides a pragmatic way of harmonising different perspectives aimed at maximising health experience. Practical implications: All health care systems are facing increasing demands within finite resources. Although many countries are introducing ways to prioritise health services, the decisions often face legal, political, commercial and ethical challenge. The research will help health systems to respond to these challenges. Social implications: This study helps in increasing public involvement in complex health challenges. Originality/value: No other groups have used this combination of approaches to address this issue.

KW - Evidence-based practice

KW - Health services sector

KW - Hospital management

KW - Inequality

KW - National Health Service

KW - New Zealand

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057030079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057030079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JHOM-02-2018-0065

DO - 10.1108/JHOM-02-2018-0065

M3 - Article

C2 - 30859907

AN - SCOPUS:85057030079

JO - Journal of Health Organization and Management

JF - Journal of Health Organization and Management

SN - 1477-7266

ER -