Abstract
In labor and delivery care areas across the United States, attending anesthesiologists often supervise medical trainees (anesthesia residents) or nurse anesthetists as they perform neuraxial procedures. Contrary to this standard approach, patients will occasionally request that the attending anesthesiologist exclusively perform their procedures, as an “attending-only” procedure. In this pro/con discussion, several obstetric anesthesiologists discuss considerations and provide opinions regarding why one might honor or refuse these patient requests, exploring perspectives of education, equity, medical ethics, and medical complexity. The ultimate decision should be tailored to the patient's specific needs and priorities through shared decision-making and will also be dependent on the practitioner's judgment and values.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 105235 |
| Journal | International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia |
| Volume | 68 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2026 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Ethics
- Labor epidural analgesia
- Obstetric anesthesia
- Pro/Con discussion
- Spinal anesthesia
- “Attending-only” discussion
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-institutional perspectives on accommodating the request for “attending-only” neuraxial procedures in the United States: a pro/con discussion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS