Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cross-institutional perspectives on accommodating the request for “attending-only” neuraxial procedures in the United States: a pro/con discussion

  • Jordan A. Francke
  • , Jimin J. Kim
  • , James K. Damron
  • , Brandon M. Togioka
  • , Richard M. Smiley
  • , David J. Berman
  • , Laurence E. Ring

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

In labor and delivery care areas across the United States, attending anesthesiologists often supervise medical trainees (anesthesia residents) or nurse anesthetists as they perform neuraxial procedures. Contrary to this standard approach, patients will occasionally request that the attending anesthesiologist exclusively perform their procedures, as an “attending-only” procedure. In this pro/con discussion, several obstetric anesthesiologists discuss considerations and provide opinions regarding why one might honor or refuse these patient requests, exploring perspectives of education, equity, medical ethics, and medical complexity. The ultimate decision should be tailored to the patient's specific needs and priorities through shared decision-making and will also be dependent on the practitioner's judgment and values.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number105235
JournalInternational Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume68
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • Labor epidural analgesia
  • Obstetric anesthesia
  • Pro/Con discussion
  • Spinal anesthesia
  • “Attending-only” discussion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-institutional perspectives on accommodating the request for “attending-only” neuraxial procedures in the United States: a pro/con discussion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this