Cryostorage failures

a medicolegal review

Christopher P. Moutos, Rana Lahham, John Phelps

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Purpose: To heighten awareness of the potential legal and financial burdens faced by those providing cryopreservation storage services of embryos and gametes in light of recent lawsuits involving inadvertent thawing of specimens. Methods: Case law review of US legal databases and courthouse dockets with a focus on lawsuits against reproductive endocrinologists and cryostorage facilities offering cryopreservation. Emphasis was placed on court decisions, awarded damages, and legal and media coverage related to cryostorage failure events. Results: Lawsuits pertaining to two notable ongoing cases of cryostorage failure that occurred at fertility clinics in the US in 2018 were reviewed. Media coverage of these events and plaintiff and defense attorney strategies were evaluated. Legal documents from previous, similar cryostorage failures were also reviewed. Common claims in cryostorage system failures include breach of contract and negligent handling of property. Facilities offering cryostorage services are vulnerable to significant burden, legally and financially, if they are to experience a storage system failure. Conclusion: Providing cryostorage services is not without significant financial risk. Inadvertent thawing of specimens can lead to high damage awards against cryostorage facilities and those individuals linked to a cryostorage failure event. Because monetary damages can surpass insurance policy limits, those providing cryostorage services should be aware of plaintiff attorney strategies, common legal defenses, and basic asset protection principles to safeguard themselves if ever faced with these situations. Facilities should also carry out regular maintenance and safety checks on equipment and alarm structures to deter such events.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Lawyers
Cryopreservation
Jurisprudence
Contracts
Insurance
Germ Cells
Fertility
Embryonic Structures
Maintenance
Databases
Safety
Equipment and Supplies
Endocrinologists

Keywords

  • Cryopreservation
  • Cryostorage
  • Embryo
  • Liability
  • Medical negligence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Genetics
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Cryostorage failures : a medicolegal review. / Moutos, Christopher P.; Lahham, Rana; Phelps, John.

In: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Moutos, Christopher P. ; Lahham, Rana ; Phelps, John. / Cryostorage failures : a medicolegal review. In: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2019.
@article{daec5194015e429cb168090aaaf74d45,
title = "Cryostorage failures: a medicolegal review",
abstract = "Purpose: To heighten awareness of the potential legal and financial burdens faced by those providing cryopreservation storage services of embryos and gametes in light of recent lawsuits involving inadvertent thawing of specimens. Methods: Case law review of US legal databases and courthouse dockets with a focus on lawsuits against reproductive endocrinologists and cryostorage facilities offering cryopreservation. Emphasis was placed on court decisions, awarded damages, and legal and media coverage related to cryostorage failure events. Results: Lawsuits pertaining to two notable ongoing cases of cryostorage failure that occurred at fertility clinics in the US in 2018 were reviewed. Media coverage of these events and plaintiff and defense attorney strategies were evaluated. Legal documents from previous, similar cryostorage failures were also reviewed. Common claims in cryostorage system failures include breach of contract and negligent handling of property. Facilities offering cryostorage services are vulnerable to significant burden, legally and financially, if they are to experience a storage system failure. Conclusion: Providing cryostorage services is not without significant financial risk. Inadvertent thawing of specimens can lead to high damage awards against cryostorage facilities and those individuals linked to a cryostorage failure event. Because monetary damages can surpass insurance policy limits, those providing cryostorage services should be aware of plaintiff attorney strategies, common legal defenses, and basic asset protection principles to safeguard themselves if ever faced with these situations. Facilities should also carry out regular maintenance and safety checks on equipment and alarm structures to deter such events.",
keywords = "Cryopreservation, Cryostorage, Embryo, Liability, Medical negligence",
author = "Moutos, {Christopher P.} and Rana Lahham and John Phelps",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10815-019-01478-x",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer",
issn = "0740-7769",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cryostorage failures

T2 - a medicolegal review

AU - Moutos, Christopher P.

AU - Lahham, Rana

AU - Phelps, John

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To heighten awareness of the potential legal and financial burdens faced by those providing cryopreservation storage services of embryos and gametes in light of recent lawsuits involving inadvertent thawing of specimens. Methods: Case law review of US legal databases and courthouse dockets with a focus on lawsuits against reproductive endocrinologists and cryostorage facilities offering cryopreservation. Emphasis was placed on court decisions, awarded damages, and legal and media coverage related to cryostorage failure events. Results: Lawsuits pertaining to two notable ongoing cases of cryostorage failure that occurred at fertility clinics in the US in 2018 were reviewed. Media coverage of these events and plaintiff and defense attorney strategies were evaluated. Legal documents from previous, similar cryostorage failures were also reviewed. Common claims in cryostorage system failures include breach of contract and negligent handling of property. Facilities offering cryostorage services are vulnerable to significant burden, legally and financially, if they are to experience a storage system failure. Conclusion: Providing cryostorage services is not without significant financial risk. Inadvertent thawing of specimens can lead to high damage awards against cryostorage facilities and those individuals linked to a cryostorage failure event. Because monetary damages can surpass insurance policy limits, those providing cryostorage services should be aware of plaintiff attorney strategies, common legal defenses, and basic asset protection principles to safeguard themselves if ever faced with these situations. Facilities should also carry out regular maintenance and safety checks on equipment and alarm structures to deter such events.

AB - Purpose: To heighten awareness of the potential legal and financial burdens faced by those providing cryopreservation storage services of embryos and gametes in light of recent lawsuits involving inadvertent thawing of specimens. Methods: Case law review of US legal databases and courthouse dockets with a focus on lawsuits against reproductive endocrinologists and cryostorage facilities offering cryopreservation. Emphasis was placed on court decisions, awarded damages, and legal and media coverage related to cryostorage failure events. Results: Lawsuits pertaining to two notable ongoing cases of cryostorage failure that occurred at fertility clinics in the US in 2018 were reviewed. Media coverage of these events and plaintiff and defense attorney strategies were evaluated. Legal documents from previous, similar cryostorage failures were also reviewed. Common claims in cryostorage system failures include breach of contract and negligent handling of property. Facilities offering cryostorage services are vulnerable to significant burden, legally and financially, if they are to experience a storage system failure. Conclusion: Providing cryostorage services is not without significant financial risk. Inadvertent thawing of specimens can lead to high damage awards against cryostorage facilities and those individuals linked to a cryostorage failure event. Because monetary damages can surpass insurance policy limits, those providing cryostorage services should be aware of plaintiff attorney strategies, common legal defenses, and basic asset protection principles to safeguard themselves if ever faced with these situations. Facilities should also carry out regular maintenance and safety checks on equipment and alarm structures to deter such events.

KW - Cryopreservation

KW - Cryostorage

KW - Embryo

KW - Liability

KW - Medical negligence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066906955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066906955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10815-019-01478-x

DO - 10.1007/s10815-019-01478-x

M3 - Review article

JO - Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer

JF - Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer

SN - 0740-7769

ER -