Cultural differences in discussion of do-not-resuscitate status and hospice

Laura Fosler, Beth A. Staffileno, Louis Fogg, Sean O'Mahony

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Previous research has shown that African American and Latino populations prefer more aggressive care at end of life. The purpose of this retrospective chart review was to describe whether having a palliative care consultation affected acceptance of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status and hospice in these populations. Data were extracted from the medical records of patients who received a palliative care consultation between March 2011 and July 2011. Data extracted were race, age, gender, primary disease process, DNR status at time of consult and at discharge, and whether the patient enrolled in hospice if eligible. Demographic variables were tabulated using descriptive statistics or frequency distributions where appropriate. t Tests and analyses of variance were conducted to examine differences between ethnic groups. The sample size was 199, of which 38% were African American and 15% Hispanic. Prior to consultation, there were statistically significant differences regarding DNR status; after consultation, there were no differences in acceptance of DNR among races. Statistically significant differences among ethnicities remained in hospice enrollment. The authors conclude that palliative care consultations make a significant difference in this patient population. Further research is needed to identify why having a palliative care consultation impacted the decision about code status.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)128-132
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 21 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • End of life
  • Hospice
  • Racial disparities
  • Resuscitation
  • Rush university

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Community and Home Care
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cultural differences in discussion of do-not-resuscitate status and hospice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this