Current outpatient management of asthma shows poor compliance with international consensus guidelines

David McD Taylor, Thomas E. Auble, William Calhoun, Vincent N. Mosesso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objective: This study aimed to establish whether the outpatient management of patients presenting with an asthma exacerbation to the emergency department (ED) was in compliance with the 1992 guidelines of the 'International Consensus Report on the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma.' Design: Prospective, observational study using a researcher-administered questionnaire. Setting: University tertiary referral ED. Patients: Convenience sample of asthmatics (aged 18 to 54 years) presenting for asthma treatment between July 1, 1997, and June 30, 1998. Results: Eighty-five asthmatic patients were enrolled. Of these, 34 patients (40%) smoked, 53 patients (62%) were undertreated with medication when compared to the consensus guidelines, and 74 patients (87%) had no written 'plan of action.' During an asthma attack, 9 patients (11%) did not use a bronchodilator as first-line action and 76 patients (89%) did not commence or increase the use of an inhaled steroid. Forty-nine patients (58%) did not know that bronchospasm occurred in asthma, and 53 patients (62%) did not know that bronchial swelling occurred. Twenty-six patients (31%) thought short-acting bronchodilator drugs were asthma preventers. Sixty-two patients (73%) could not adequately define peak expiratory flow (PF), 41 patients (48%) did not own a PF meter, and only 8 patients (9%) determined their PF daily. Fifty- three patients (62%) were reviewed by a physician once a year or less, and 18 patients (21%) noted family and friends as their only source of asthma education. Conclusions: The outpatient management of most asthma patients presenting to the ED did not comply with the consensus guidelines, and asthma knowledge was poor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1638-1645
Number of pages8
JournalChest
Volume116
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Outpatients
Asthma
Guidelines
Hospital Emergency Service
Consensus
Bronchodilator Agents
Bronchial Spasm
Observational Studies
Referral and Consultation
Steroids
Research Personnel
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Asthma
  • Emergency department
  • Guidelines
  • Management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Current outpatient management of asthma shows poor compliance with international consensus guidelines. / Taylor, David McD; Auble, Thomas E.; Calhoun, William; Mosesso, Vincent N.

In: Chest, Vol. 116, No. 6, 1999, p. 1638-1645.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Taylor, DM, Auble, TE, Calhoun, W & Mosesso, VN 1999, 'Current outpatient management of asthma shows poor compliance with international consensus guidelines', Chest, vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 1638-1645.
Taylor, David McD ; Auble, Thomas E. ; Calhoun, William ; Mosesso, Vincent N. / Current outpatient management of asthma shows poor compliance with international consensus guidelines. In: Chest. 1999 ; Vol. 116, No. 6. pp. 1638-1645.
@article{6cde32be8d554cf798712de2158d4e3a,
title = "Current outpatient management of asthma shows poor compliance with international consensus guidelines",
abstract = "Study objective: This study aimed to establish whether the outpatient management of patients presenting with an asthma exacerbation to the emergency department (ED) was in compliance with the 1992 guidelines of the 'International Consensus Report on the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma.' Design: Prospective, observational study using a researcher-administered questionnaire. Setting: University tertiary referral ED. Patients: Convenience sample of asthmatics (aged 18 to 54 years) presenting for asthma treatment between July 1, 1997, and June 30, 1998. Results: Eighty-five asthmatic patients were enrolled. Of these, 34 patients (40{\%}) smoked, 53 patients (62{\%}) were undertreated with medication when compared to the consensus guidelines, and 74 patients (87{\%}) had no written 'plan of action.' During an asthma attack, 9 patients (11{\%}) did not use a bronchodilator as first-line action and 76 patients (89{\%}) did not commence or increase the use of an inhaled steroid. Forty-nine patients (58{\%}) did not know that bronchospasm occurred in asthma, and 53 patients (62{\%}) did not know that bronchial swelling occurred. Twenty-six patients (31{\%}) thought short-acting bronchodilator drugs were asthma preventers. Sixty-two patients (73{\%}) could not adequately define peak expiratory flow (PF), 41 patients (48{\%}) did not own a PF meter, and only 8 patients (9{\%}) determined their PF daily. Fifty- three patients (62{\%}) were reviewed by a physician once a year or less, and 18 patients (21{\%}) noted family and friends as their only source of asthma education. Conclusions: The outpatient management of most asthma patients presenting to the ED did not comply with the consensus guidelines, and asthma knowledge was poor.",
keywords = "Asthma, Emergency department, Guidelines, Management",
author = "Taylor, {David McD} and Auble, {Thomas E.} and William Calhoun and Mosesso, {Vincent N.}",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "1638--1645",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current outpatient management of asthma shows poor compliance with international consensus guidelines

AU - Taylor, David McD

AU - Auble, Thomas E.

AU - Calhoun, William

AU - Mosesso, Vincent N.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Study objective: This study aimed to establish whether the outpatient management of patients presenting with an asthma exacerbation to the emergency department (ED) was in compliance with the 1992 guidelines of the 'International Consensus Report on the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma.' Design: Prospective, observational study using a researcher-administered questionnaire. Setting: University tertiary referral ED. Patients: Convenience sample of asthmatics (aged 18 to 54 years) presenting for asthma treatment between July 1, 1997, and June 30, 1998. Results: Eighty-five asthmatic patients were enrolled. Of these, 34 patients (40%) smoked, 53 patients (62%) were undertreated with medication when compared to the consensus guidelines, and 74 patients (87%) had no written 'plan of action.' During an asthma attack, 9 patients (11%) did not use a bronchodilator as first-line action and 76 patients (89%) did not commence or increase the use of an inhaled steroid. Forty-nine patients (58%) did not know that bronchospasm occurred in asthma, and 53 patients (62%) did not know that bronchial swelling occurred. Twenty-six patients (31%) thought short-acting bronchodilator drugs were asthma preventers. Sixty-two patients (73%) could not adequately define peak expiratory flow (PF), 41 patients (48%) did not own a PF meter, and only 8 patients (9%) determined their PF daily. Fifty- three patients (62%) were reviewed by a physician once a year or less, and 18 patients (21%) noted family and friends as their only source of asthma education. Conclusions: The outpatient management of most asthma patients presenting to the ED did not comply with the consensus guidelines, and asthma knowledge was poor.

AB - Study objective: This study aimed to establish whether the outpatient management of patients presenting with an asthma exacerbation to the emergency department (ED) was in compliance with the 1992 guidelines of the 'International Consensus Report on the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma.' Design: Prospective, observational study using a researcher-administered questionnaire. Setting: University tertiary referral ED. Patients: Convenience sample of asthmatics (aged 18 to 54 years) presenting for asthma treatment between July 1, 1997, and June 30, 1998. Results: Eighty-five asthmatic patients were enrolled. Of these, 34 patients (40%) smoked, 53 patients (62%) were undertreated with medication when compared to the consensus guidelines, and 74 patients (87%) had no written 'plan of action.' During an asthma attack, 9 patients (11%) did not use a bronchodilator as first-line action and 76 patients (89%) did not commence or increase the use of an inhaled steroid. Forty-nine patients (58%) did not know that bronchospasm occurred in asthma, and 53 patients (62%) did not know that bronchial swelling occurred. Twenty-six patients (31%) thought short-acting bronchodilator drugs were asthma preventers. Sixty-two patients (73%) could not adequately define peak expiratory flow (PF), 41 patients (48%) did not own a PF meter, and only 8 patients (9%) determined their PF daily. Fifty- three patients (62%) were reviewed by a physician once a year or less, and 18 patients (21%) noted family and friends as their only source of asthma education. Conclusions: The outpatient management of most asthma patients presenting to the ED did not comply with the consensus guidelines, and asthma knowledge was poor.

KW - Asthma

KW - Emergency department

KW - Guidelines

KW - Management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033397281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033397281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10593788

AN - SCOPUS:0033397281

VL - 116

SP - 1638

EP - 1645

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 6

ER -