Curricular Innovation in the Surgery Clerkship: Can Assessment Methods Influence Development of Critical Thinking and Clinical Skills?

James A. McClintic, Clifford L. Snyder, Kimberly M. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Although key clinical skills have been defined in the Core Entrustable Professional Activities, there is a need to improve medical school curricula with standardized training opportunities and assessments of these skills. Thus, we aimed to develop an innovative curriculum that emphasized critical thinking and clinical skills. We hypothesized that we would be able to observe measurable improvement on assessments of students' critical thinking and clinical skills after the implementation of the new curriculum. Design: Prospective, Quasi-Experimental study with the use of historical controls. Setting: This study took place through the third-year surgical clerkship at the University of Texas Medical Branch at the Galveston, Houston, and Austin, Texas, locations. Participants: A total of 214 students taking the third-year surgical clerkship for the first time during the periods of interest were included. Results: Although the students with traditional curriculum improved 9.5% on a short answer exam from preclerkship to postclerkship completion, the students with new curriculum improved by 40%. Students under the new curriculum performed significantly better on the Objective Structured Clinical Exam; however, their shelf scores were lower. Conclusions: Under this new curriculum and grading system, we demonstrated that students can be incentivized to improve critical thinking and clinical skills, but this needs to be balanced with knowledge-based incentives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Surgical Education
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Clinical Competence
Curriculum
surgery
innovation
curriculum
Students
student
training opportunities
grading
Thinking
Medical Schools
Motivation
incentive
school
knowledge

Keywords

  • Clerkship;
  • Curriculum;
  • Entrustable professional activities
  • Interpersonal and Communication Skills
  • Medical Knowledge
  • Patient Care
  • Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
  • Professionalism
  • Surgery;
  • Systems Based Practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Education

Cite this

Curricular Innovation in the Surgery Clerkship : Can Assessment Methods Influence Development of Critical Thinking and Clinical Skills? / McClintic, James A.; Snyder, Clifford L.; Brown, Kimberly M.

In: Journal of Surgical Education, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{347610f7dc9c4cdbb9fb9d45722bcd0b,
title = "Curricular Innovation in the Surgery Clerkship: Can Assessment Methods Influence Development of Critical Thinking and Clinical Skills?",
abstract = "Objective: Although key clinical skills have been defined in the Core Entrustable Professional Activities, there is a need to improve medical school curricula with standardized training opportunities and assessments of these skills. Thus, we aimed to develop an innovative curriculum that emphasized critical thinking and clinical skills. We hypothesized that we would be able to observe measurable improvement on assessments of students' critical thinking and clinical skills after the implementation of the new curriculum. Design: Prospective, Quasi-Experimental study with the use of historical controls. Setting: This study took place through the third-year surgical clerkship at the University of Texas Medical Branch at the Galveston, Houston, and Austin, Texas, locations. Participants: A total of 214 students taking the third-year surgical clerkship for the first time during the periods of interest were included. Results: Although the students with traditional curriculum improved 9.5{\%} on a short answer exam from preclerkship to postclerkship completion, the students with new curriculum improved by 40{\%}. Students under the new curriculum performed significantly better on the Objective Structured Clinical Exam; however, their shelf scores were lower. Conclusions: Under this new curriculum and grading system, we demonstrated that students can be incentivized to improve critical thinking and clinical skills, but this needs to be balanced with knowledge-based incentives.",
keywords = "Clerkship;, Curriculum;, Entrustable professional activities, Interpersonal and Communication Skills, Medical Knowledge, Patient Care, Practice-Based Learning and Improvement, Professionalism, Surgery;, Systems Based Practice",
author = "McClintic, {James A.} and Snyder, {Clifford L.} and Brown, {Kimberly M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.02.012",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Education",
issn = "1931-7204",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Curricular Innovation in the Surgery Clerkship

T2 - Can Assessment Methods Influence Development of Critical Thinking and Clinical Skills?

AU - McClintic, James A.

AU - Snyder, Clifford L.

AU - Brown, Kimberly M.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: Although key clinical skills have been defined in the Core Entrustable Professional Activities, there is a need to improve medical school curricula with standardized training opportunities and assessments of these skills. Thus, we aimed to develop an innovative curriculum that emphasized critical thinking and clinical skills. We hypothesized that we would be able to observe measurable improvement on assessments of students' critical thinking and clinical skills after the implementation of the new curriculum. Design: Prospective, Quasi-Experimental study with the use of historical controls. Setting: This study took place through the third-year surgical clerkship at the University of Texas Medical Branch at the Galveston, Houston, and Austin, Texas, locations. Participants: A total of 214 students taking the third-year surgical clerkship for the first time during the periods of interest were included. Results: Although the students with traditional curriculum improved 9.5% on a short answer exam from preclerkship to postclerkship completion, the students with new curriculum improved by 40%. Students under the new curriculum performed significantly better on the Objective Structured Clinical Exam; however, their shelf scores were lower. Conclusions: Under this new curriculum and grading system, we demonstrated that students can be incentivized to improve critical thinking and clinical skills, but this needs to be balanced with knowledge-based incentives.

AB - Objective: Although key clinical skills have been defined in the Core Entrustable Professional Activities, there is a need to improve medical school curricula with standardized training opportunities and assessments of these skills. Thus, we aimed to develop an innovative curriculum that emphasized critical thinking and clinical skills. We hypothesized that we would be able to observe measurable improvement on assessments of students' critical thinking and clinical skills after the implementation of the new curriculum. Design: Prospective, Quasi-Experimental study with the use of historical controls. Setting: This study took place through the third-year surgical clerkship at the University of Texas Medical Branch at the Galveston, Houston, and Austin, Texas, locations. Participants: A total of 214 students taking the third-year surgical clerkship for the first time during the periods of interest were included. Results: Although the students with traditional curriculum improved 9.5% on a short answer exam from preclerkship to postclerkship completion, the students with new curriculum improved by 40%. Students under the new curriculum performed significantly better on the Objective Structured Clinical Exam; however, their shelf scores were lower. Conclusions: Under this new curriculum and grading system, we demonstrated that students can be incentivized to improve critical thinking and clinical skills, but this needs to be balanced with knowledge-based incentives.

KW - Clerkship;

KW - Curriculum;

KW - Entrustable professional activities

KW - Interpersonal and Communication Skills

KW - Medical Knowledge

KW - Patient Care

KW - Practice-Based Learning and Improvement

KW - Professionalism

KW - Surgery;

KW - Systems Based Practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043463179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043463179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.02.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.02.012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85043463179

JO - Journal of Surgical Education

JF - Journal of Surgical Education

SN - 1931-7204

ER -