Abstract
This chapter considers the legal case of Stamford Hospital vs. Nelly E. Vega, 674 A. 2d 821 (Conn., 1996). In this matter, an obstetrical patient was given blood transfusions against her will despite having articulated a clear preference for not receiving blood products. Clinical issues discussed include the distinction between civil competency and civil capacity, approaches to assessments of decision-making capacity, selection of a proxy decision-maker, and special considerations in the care of the Jehovah's Witness patient.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Psychiatry and the Law |
Subtitle of host publication | Basic Principles: Second Edition |
Publisher | Springer International Publishing |
Pages | 85-95 |
Number of pages | 11 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9783031525896 |
ISBN (Print) | 9783031525889 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 29 2024 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Capacity
- Competency
- Decision-making
- Jehovah's Witness
- Proxy
- Substituted judgment
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine
- General Psychology