Defining family-centered rounds

Laura L. Sisterhen, Richard T. Blaszak, Majka B. Woods, Christopher E. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Physicians are required to provide safe, effective, and high-quality care that is patient-centered. Continuing to meet the educational needs of residents and medical students in the setting of patient-centered care will require developing new models for hospital "work rounds" Family-centered rounds is a model of communicating and learning between the patient, family, medical professionals, and students on an academic, inpatient ward setting. Unfortunately, in the medical literature, there is no consensus on the definition of family-centered rounds. Summary: Despite the increased utilization of hospitalists and the recognition that bedside teaching has many benefits, bedside rounds are underutilized. In this article, we present a description of family-centered rounds that is supported by a review of the literature on bedside teaching, family-centered care, and interdisciplinary care. The key difference between family-centered rounds and traditional bedside teaching is the active participation of the patient and family in the discussion. Interdisciplinary care implies that professionals from a variety of disciplines work collaboratively to develop a unified care plan. Family-centered rounding provides an interface between families and medical professionals that allows education of medical students and residents as well as the development of a unified care plan. Conclusions: Family-centered rounds hold potential to create a patient-centered environment, enhance medical education, and improve patient outcomes. The model is a planned, purposeful interaction that requires the permission of patients and families as well as the cooperation of physicians, nurses, and ancillary staff.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)319-322
Number of pages4
JournalTeaching and Learning in Medicine
Volume19
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medical Students
Teaching
Medical Education
medical student
physician
Hospitalists
resident
Physicians
Patient Participation
Patient-Centered Care
Professional Education
Quality of Health Care
Patient Education
Inpatients
Consensus
education
nurse
utilization
Nurses
Learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Sisterhen, L. L., Blaszak, R. T., Woods, M. B., & Smith, C. E. (2007). Defining family-centered rounds. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 19(3), 319-322.

Defining family-centered rounds. / Sisterhen, Laura L.; Blaszak, Richard T.; Woods, Majka B.; Smith, Christopher E.

In: Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 3, 06.2007, p. 319-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sisterhen, LL, Blaszak, RT, Woods, MB & Smith, CE 2007, 'Defining family-centered rounds', Teaching and Learning in Medicine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 319-322.
Sisterhen LL, Blaszak RT, Woods MB, Smith CE. Defining family-centered rounds. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2007 Jun;19(3):319-322.
Sisterhen, Laura L. ; Blaszak, Richard T. ; Woods, Majka B. ; Smith, Christopher E. / Defining family-centered rounds. In: Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 319-322.
@article{1e685f84197c447e805be772b5f71c00,
title = "Defining family-centered rounds",
abstract = "Background: Physicians are required to provide safe, effective, and high-quality care that is patient-centered. Continuing to meet the educational needs of residents and medical students in the setting of patient-centered care will require developing new models for hospital {"}work rounds{"} Family-centered rounds is a model of communicating and learning between the patient, family, medical professionals, and students on an academic, inpatient ward setting. Unfortunately, in the medical literature, there is no consensus on the definition of family-centered rounds. Summary: Despite the increased utilization of hospitalists and the recognition that bedside teaching has many benefits, bedside rounds are underutilized. In this article, we present a description of family-centered rounds that is supported by a review of the literature on bedside teaching, family-centered care, and interdisciplinary care. The key difference between family-centered rounds and traditional bedside teaching is the active participation of the patient and family in the discussion. Interdisciplinary care implies that professionals from a variety of disciplines work collaboratively to develop a unified care plan. Family-centered rounding provides an interface between families and medical professionals that allows education of medical students and residents as well as the development of a unified care plan. Conclusions: Family-centered rounds hold potential to create a patient-centered environment, enhance medical education, and improve patient outcomes. The model is a planned, purposeful interaction that requires the permission of patients and families as well as the cooperation of physicians, nurses, and ancillary staff.",
author = "Sisterhen, {Laura L.} and Blaszak, {Richard T.} and Woods, {Majka B.} and Smith, {Christopher E.}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "319--322",
journal = "Teaching and Learning in Medicine",
issn = "1040-1334",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining family-centered rounds

AU - Sisterhen, Laura L.

AU - Blaszak, Richard T.

AU - Woods, Majka B.

AU - Smith, Christopher E.

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Background: Physicians are required to provide safe, effective, and high-quality care that is patient-centered. Continuing to meet the educational needs of residents and medical students in the setting of patient-centered care will require developing new models for hospital "work rounds" Family-centered rounds is a model of communicating and learning between the patient, family, medical professionals, and students on an academic, inpatient ward setting. Unfortunately, in the medical literature, there is no consensus on the definition of family-centered rounds. Summary: Despite the increased utilization of hospitalists and the recognition that bedside teaching has many benefits, bedside rounds are underutilized. In this article, we present a description of family-centered rounds that is supported by a review of the literature on bedside teaching, family-centered care, and interdisciplinary care. The key difference between family-centered rounds and traditional bedside teaching is the active participation of the patient and family in the discussion. Interdisciplinary care implies that professionals from a variety of disciplines work collaboratively to develop a unified care plan. Family-centered rounding provides an interface between families and medical professionals that allows education of medical students and residents as well as the development of a unified care plan. Conclusions: Family-centered rounds hold potential to create a patient-centered environment, enhance medical education, and improve patient outcomes. The model is a planned, purposeful interaction that requires the permission of patients and families as well as the cooperation of physicians, nurses, and ancillary staff.

AB - Background: Physicians are required to provide safe, effective, and high-quality care that is patient-centered. Continuing to meet the educational needs of residents and medical students in the setting of patient-centered care will require developing new models for hospital "work rounds" Family-centered rounds is a model of communicating and learning between the patient, family, medical professionals, and students on an academic, inpatient ward setting. Unfortunately, in the medical literature, there is no consensus on the definition of family-centered rounds. Summary: Despite the increased utilization of hospitalists and the recognition that bedside teaching has many benefits, bedside rounds are underutilized. In this article, we present a description of family-centered rounds that is supported by a review of the literature on bedside teaching, family-centered care, and interdisciplinary care. The key difference between family-centered rounds and traditional bedside teaching is the active participation of the patient and family in the discussion. Interdisciplinary care implies that professionals from a variety of disciplines work collaboratively to develop a unified care plan. Family-centered rounding provides an interface between families and medical professionals that allows education of medical students and residents as well as the development of a unified care plan. Conclusions: Family-centered rounds hold potential to create a patient-centered environment, enhance medical education, and improve patient outcomes. The model is a planned, purposeful interaction that requires the permission of patients and families as well as the cooperation of physicians, nurses, and ancillary staff.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447565229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447565229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 319

EP - 322

JO - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

JF - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

SN - 1040-1334

IS - 3

ER -