Defining treatment response in trichotillomania: A signal detection analysis

David Houghton, Matthew R. Capriotti, Alessandro S. De Nadai, Scott N. Compton, Michael P. Twohig, Angela M. Neal-Barnett, Stephen M. Saunders, Martin E. Franklin, Douglas W. Woods

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale (MGH-HPS) and the NIMH Trichotillomania Severity Scale (NIMH-TSS) are two widely used measures of trichotillomania severity. Despite their popular use, currently no empirically-supported guidelines exist to determine the degrees of change on these scales that best indicate treatment response. Determination of such criteria could aid in clinical decision-making by defining clinically significant treatment response/recovery and producing accurate power analyses for use in clinical trials research. Adults with trichotillomania (. N=69) participated in a randomized controlled trial of psychotherapy and were assessed before and after treatment. Response status was measured via the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale, and remission status was measured via the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale. For treatment response, a 45% reduction or 7-point raw score change on the MGH-HPS was the best indicator of clinically significant treatment response, and on the NIMH-TSS, a 30-40% reduction or 6-point raw score difference was most effective cutoff. For disorder remission, a 55-60% reduction or 7-point raw score change on the MGH-HPS was the best predictor, and on the NIMH-TSS, a 65% reduction or 6-point raw score change was the best indicator of disorder remission. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)44-51
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Anxiety Disorders
Volume36
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Trichotillomania
National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
General Hospitals
Psychotherapy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Psychological Signal Detection
Clinical Trials
Guidelines
Research

Keywords

  • Hair pulling
  • Obsessive-compulsive disorder
  • Psychotherapy
  • Signal detection
  • Trichotillomania

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Houghton, D., Capriotti, M. R., De Nadai, A. S., Compton, S. N., Twohig, M. P., Neal-Barnett, A. M., ... Woods, D. W. (2015). Defining treatment response in trichotillomania: A signal detection analysis. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 36, 44-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.09.008

Defining treatment response in trichotillomania : A signal detection analysis. / Houghton, David; Capriotti, Matthew R.; De Nadai, Alessandro S.; Compton, Scott N.; Twohig, Michael P.; Neal-Barnett, Angela M.; Saunders, Stephen M.; Franklin, Martin E.; Woods, Douglas W.

In: Journal of Anxiety Disorders, Vol. 36, 01.12.2015, p. 44-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Houghton, D, Capriotti, MR, De Nadai, AS, Compton, SN, Twohig, MP, Neal-Barnett, AM, Saunders, SM, Franklin, ME & Woods, DW 2015, 'Defining treatment response in trichotillomania: A signal detection analysis', Journal of Anxiety Disorders, vol. 36, pp. 44-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.09.008
Houghton, David ; Capriotti, Matthew R. ; De Nadai, Alessandro S. ; Compton, Scott N. ; Twohig, Michael P. ; Neal-Barnett, Angela M. ; Saunders, Stephen M. ; Franklin, Martin E. ; Woods, Douglas W. / Defining treatment response in trichotillomania : A signal detection analysis. In: Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2015 ; Vol. 36. pp. 44-51.
@article{f9884d9b6e954d2f84f9711701224154,
title = "Defining treatment response in trichotillomania: A signal detection analysis",
abstract = "The Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale (MGH-HPS) and the NIMH Trichotillomania Severity Scale (NIMH-TSS) are two widely used measures of trichotillomania severity. Despite their popular use, currently no empirically-supported guidelines exist to determine the degrees of change on these scales that best indicate treatment response. Determination of such criteria could aid in clinical decision-making by defining clinically significant treatment response/recovery and producing accurate power analyses for use in clinical trials research. Adults with trichotillomania (. N=69) participated in a randomized controlled trial of psychotherapy and were assessed before and after treatment. Response status was measured via the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale, and remission status was measured via the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale. For treatment response, a 45{\%} reduction or 7-point raw score change on the MGH-HPS was the best indicator of clinically significant treatment response, and on the NIMH-TSS, a 30-40{\%} reduction or 6-point raw score difference was most effective cutoff. For disorder remission, a 55-60{\%} reduction or 7-point raw score change on the MGH-HPS was the best predictor, and on the NIMH-TSS, a 65{\%} reduction or 6-point raw score change was the best indicator of disorder remission. Implications of these findings are discussed.",
keywords = "Hair pulling, Obsessive-compulsive disorder, Psychotherapy, Signal detection, Trichotillomania",
author = "David Houghton and Capriotti, {Matthew R.} and {De Nadai}, {Alessandro S.} and Compton, {Scott N.} and Twohig, {Michael P.} and Neal-Barnett, {Angela M.} and Saunders, {Stephen M.} and Franklin, {Martin E.} and Woods, {Douglas W.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.09.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "44--51",
journal = "Journal of Anxiety Disorders",
issn = "0887-6185",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining treatment response in trichotillomania

T2 - A signal detection analysis

AU - Houghton, David

AU - Capriotti, Matthew R.

AU - De Nadai, Alessandro S.

AU - Compton, Scott N.

AU - Twohig, Michael P.

AU - Neal-Barnett, Angela M.

AU - Saunders, Stephen M.

AU - Franklin, Martin E.

AU - Woods, Douglas W.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - The Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale (MGH-HPS) and the NIMH Trichotillomania Severity Scale (NIMH-TSS) are two widely used measures of trichotillomania severity. Despite their popular use, currently no empirically-supported guidelines exist to determine the degrees of change on these scales that best indicate treatment response. Determination of such criteria could aid in clinical decision-making by defining clinically significant treatment response/recovery and producing accurate power analyses for use in clinical trials research. Adults with trichotillomania (. N=69) participated in a randomized controlled trial of psychotherapy and were assessed before and after treatment. Response status was measured via the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale, and remission status was measured via the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale. For treatment response, a 45% reduction or 7-point raw score change on the MGH-HPS was the best indicator of clinically significant treatment response, and on the NIMH-TSS, a 30-40% reduction or 6-point raw score difference was most effective cutoff. For disorder remission, a 55-60% reduction or 7-point raw score change on the MGH-HPS was the best predictor, and on the NIMH-TSS, a 65% reduction or 6-point raw score change was the best indicator of disorder remission. Implications of these findings are discussed.

AB - The Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale (MGH-HPS) and the NIMH Trichotillomania Severity Scale (NIMH-TSS) are two widely used measures of trichotillomania severity. Despite their popular use, currently no empirically-supported guidelines exist to determine the degrees of change on these scales that best indicate treatment response. Determination of such criteria could aid in clinical decision-making by defining clinically significant treatment response/recovery and producing accurate power analyses for use in clinical trials research. Adults with trichotillomania (. N=69) participated in a randomized controlled trial of psychotherapy and were assessed before and after treatment. Response status was measured via the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale, and remission status was measured via the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale. For treatment response, a 45% reduction or 7-point raw score change on the MGH-HPS was the best indicator of clinically significant treatment response, and on the NIMH-TSS, a 30-40% reduction or 6-point raw score difference was most effective cutoff. For disorder remission, a 55-60% reduction or 7-point raw score change on the MGH-HPS was the best predictor, and on the NIMH-TSS, a 65% reduction or 6-point raw score change was the best indicator of disorder remission. Implications of these findings are discussed.

KW - Hair pulling

KW - Obsessive-compulsive disorder

KW - Psychotherapy

KW - Signal detection

KW - Trichotillomania

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942523224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942523224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.09.008

DO - 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.09.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 26422605

AN - SCOPUS:84942523224

VL - 36

SP - 44

EP - 51

JO - Journal of Anxiety Disorders

JF - Journal of Anxiety Disorders

SN - 0887-6185

ER -