Defragmenting Care

Testing an Intervention to Increase the Effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Health Care Teams

Rachel Kilgore, Rae W. Langford

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Few studies in the literature have examined the outcomes of health care interdisciplinary teams. Most existing studies have measured attributes of health care teams; however, none have implemented and examined outcomes of a team development intervention. This study was conducted to determine whether a development intervention used with an existing interdisciplinary team would reduce the length of stay for patients in an acute care setting. A quasi-experimental single-subject time series design was conducted with multiple measures of length of stay collected across baseline, intervention, and reversal phases of the study. Bronstein's Model for Interdisciplinary Collaboration provided the framework for this study. The components of this model were used to guide a team development intervention comprised of 4 consecutive weeks of classroom development sessions and 4 consecutive weeks of booster messaging. Length of stay (LOS) data were collected for each of the study phases to examine preintervention LOS and compare these data with LOS during the intervention and reversal phases. The results of this study revealed that the interdisciplinary team development intervention had no positive effect on the length of stay data. Baseline mean LOS across 12 baseline months was 4.83 days (SD=0.65) with monthly means ranging from 4.1 to 6.3 days. The mean LOS was 5.1 and 4.6 days for the intervention months of May and June and 6.0, 6.5, 5.7, and 5.4 days for the reversal months of July to October, respectively. All means in the intervention and reversal phases were higher than comparable months in the baseline phase. The pattern of the graphed trend was closely aligned with the seasonal variations seen during the baseline months. Although these results showed that the team development intervention provided for this interdisciplinary team had no positive effect on the LOS, there are many factors that may have influenced the results and may provide insights useful for future research. LOS may not be the outcome variable that reflects team effectiveness for this population. It is possible that the interdisciplinary team in this study had well-developed collaborative processes before the intervention. Physicians were not included in the team development intervention yet may be the discipline whose participation may have affected LOS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-278
Number of pages8
JournalCritical Care Nursing Clinics of North America
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Care Team
Length of Stay
Interdisciplinary Studies

Keywords

  • Health care teams
  • Interdisciplinary
  • Team effectiveness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care

Cite this

Defragmenting Care : Testing an Intervention to Increase the Effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Health Care Teams. / Kilgore, Rachel; Langford, Rae W.

In: Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, Vol. 22, No. 2, 06.2010, p. 271-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{7977aac64b5340668b577002a3819648,
title = "Defragmenting Care: Testing an Intervention to Increase the Effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Health Care Teams",
abstract = "Few studies in the literature have examined the outcomes of health care interdisciplinary teams. Most existing studies have measured attributes of health care teams; however, none have implemented and examined outcomes of a team development intervention. This study was conducted to determine whether a development intervention used with an existing interdisciplinary team would reduce the length of stay for patients in an acute care setting. A quasi-experimental single-subject time series design was conducted with multiple measures of length of stay collected across baseline, intervention, and reversal phases of the study. Bronstein's Model for Interdisciplinary Collaboration provided the framework for this study. The components of this model were used to guide a team development intervention comprised of 4 consecutive weeks of classroom development sessions and 4 consecutive weeks of booster messaging. Length of stay (LOS) data were collected for each of the study phases to examine preintervention LOS and compare these data with LOS during the intervention and reversal phases. The results of this study revealed that the interdisciplinary team development intervention had no positive effect on the length of stay data. Baseline mean LOS across 12 baseline months was 4.83 days (SD=0.65) with monthly means ranging from 4.1 to 6.3 days. The mean LOS was 5.1 and 4.6 days for the intervention months of May and June and 6.0, 6.5, 5.7, and 5.4 days for the reversal months of July to October, respectively. All means in the intervention and reversal phases were higher than comparable months in the baseline phase. The pattern of the graphed trend was closely aligned with the seasonal variations seen during the baseline months. Although these results showed that the team development intervention provided for this interdisciplinary team had no positive effect on the LOS, there are many factors that may have influenced the results and may provide insights useful for future research. LOS may not be the outcome variable that reflects team effectiveness for this population. It is possible that the interdisciplinary team in this study had well-developed collaborative processes before the intervention. Physicians were not included in the team development intervention yet may be the discipline whose participation may have affected LOS.",
keywords = "Health care teams, Interdisciplinary, Team effectiveness",
author = "Rachel Kilgore and Langford, {Rae W.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.ccell.2010.03.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "271--278",
journal = "Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America",
issn = "0899-5885",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defragmenting Care

T2 - Testing an Intervention to Increase the Effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Health Care Teams

AU - Kilgore, Rachel

AU - Langford, Rae W.

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Few studies in the literature have examined the outcomes of health care interdisciplinary teams. Most existing studies have measured attributes of health care teams; however, none have implemented and examined outcomes of a team development intervention. This study was conducted to determine whether a development intervention used with an existing interdisciplinary team would reduce the length of stay for patients in an acute care setting. A quasi-experimental single-subject time series design was conducted with multiple measures of length of stay collected across baseline, intervention, and reversal phases of the study. Bronstein's Model for Interdisciplinary Collaboration provided the framework for this study. The components of this model were used to guide a team development intervention comprised of 4 consecutive weeks of classroom development sessions and 4 consecutive weeks of booster messaging. Length of stay (LOS) data were collected for each of the study phases to examine preintervention LOS and compare these data with LOS during the intervention and reversal phases. The results of this study revealed that the interdisciplinary team development intervention had no positive effect on the length of stay data. Baseline mean LOS across 12 baseline months was 4.83 days (SD=0.65) with monthly means ranging from 4.1 to 6.3 days. The mean LOS was 5.1 and 4.6 days for the intervention months of May and June and 6.0, 6.5, 5.7, and 5.4 days for the reversal months of July to October, respectively. All means in the intervention and reversal phases were higher than comparable months in the baseline phase. The pattern of the graphed trend was closely aligned with the seasonal variations seen during the baseline months. Although these results showed that the team development intervention provided for this interdisciplinary team had no positive effect on the LOS, there are many factors that may have influenced the results and may provide insights useful for future research. LOS may not be the outcome variable that reflects team effectiveness for this population. It is possible that the interdisciplinary team in this study had well-developed collaborative processes before the intervention. Physicians were not included in the team development intervention yet may be the discipline whose participation may have affected LOS.

AB - Few studies in the literature have examined the outcomes of health care interdisciplinary teams. Most existing studies have measured attributes of health care teams; however, none have implemented and examined outcomes of a team development intervention. This study was conducted to determine whether a development intervention used with an existing interdisciplinary team would reduce the length of stay for patients in an acute care setting. A quasi-experimental single-subject time series design was conducted with multiple measures of length of stay collected across baseline, intervention, and reversal phases of the study. Bronstein's Model for Interdisciplinary Collaboration provided the framework for this study. The components of this model were used to guide a team development intervention comprised of 4 consecutive weeks of classroom development sessions and 4 consecutive weeks of booster messaging. Length of stay (LOS) data were collected for each of the study phases to examine preintervention LOS and compare these data with LOS during the intervention and reversal phases. The results of this study revealed that the interdisciplinary team development intervention had no positive effect on the length of stay data. Baseline mean LOS across 12 baseline months was 4.83 days (SD=0.65) with monthly means ranging from 4.1 to 6.3 days. The mean LOS was 5.1 and 4.6 days for the intervention months of May and June and 6.0, 6.5, 5.7, and 5.4 days for the reversal months of July to October, respectively. All means in the intervention and reversal phases were higher than comparable months in the baseline phase. The pattern of the graphed trend was closely aligned with the seasonal variations seen during the baseline months. Although these results showed that the team development intervention provided for this interdisciplinary team had no positive effect on the LOS, there are many factors that may have influenced the results and may provide insights useful for future research. LOS may not be the outcome variable that reflects team effectiveness for this population. It is possible that the interdisciplinary team in this study had well-developed collaborative processes before the intervention. Physicians were not included in the team development intervention yet may be the discipline whose participation may have affected LOS.

KW - Health care teams

KW - Interdisciplinary

KW - Team effectiveness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954851738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954851738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ccell.2010.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ccell.2010.03.006

M3 - Review article

VL - 22

SP - 271

EP - 278

JO - Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America

JF - Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America

SN - 0899-5885

IS - 2

ER -