Design and calibration of unicapillary pneumotachographs

A. Giannella-Neto, C. Bellido, R. B. Barbosa, M. F. Vidal Melo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study presents a method for design and calibration of unicapillary pneumotachographs for small-animal experiments. The design, based on Poiseuille's law, defines a set of internal radius and length values that allows for laminar flow, measurable pressure differences, and minimal interference with animal's respiratory mechanics and gas exchange. A third- order polynomial calibration (Pol) of the pressure-flow relationship was employed and compared with linear calibration (Lin). Tests were done for conditions of ambient pressure (Pam) and positive pressure (Ppos) ventilation at different flow ranges. A physical model designed to match normal and low compliance in rats was used. At normal compliance, Pol provided lower errors than Lin for mixed (1-12 ml/s), mean (4-10 ml/s), and high (8-12 ml/s) flow rate calibrations for both Pain and Ppos inspiratory tests (P < 0.001 for all conditions) and expiratory tests (P < 0.001 for all conditions). At low compliance, they differed significantly with 8.6 ± 4.1% underestimation when Lin at Pain was used in Ppos tests. Ppos calibration, preferably in combination with Pol, should be used in this case to minimize errors (Pol = 0.8 ± 0.5%, Lin = 6.5 ± 4.0%, P < 0.0005). Nonlinear calibration may be useful for improvement of flow and volume measurements in small animals during both Pam and Ppos ventilation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)335-343
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Volume84
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1998
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Flow and volume measurement
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Physical model
  • Small animals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Design and calibration of unicapillary pneumotachographs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this