Detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci by the vitek AMS system

Ronald J. Zabransky, Anthony R. Di Nuzzo, Mary Beth Huber, Gail L. Woods

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability of the Vitek AMS system to detect vancomycin resistance in enterococci was evaluated by comparing the results to an agar dilution screen method. Of 100 strains tested, 43 were resistant and 51 were susceptible by both tests. Two strains were intermediate by Vitek but susceptible by agar screen, one was intermediate by Vitek but resistant by agar screen, and four were susceptible by Vitek but resistant by agar screen. When the Vitek intermediate and resistant results were combined, the false resistant rate was 4.4% and false susceptible rate was 8.5%. In its current format, the Vitek system appears not to have acceptable accuracy for the detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-116
Number of pages4
JournalDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Vancomycin Resistance
Enterococcus
Agar

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
  • Immunology
  • Microbiology
  • Parasitology
  • Virology
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci by the vitek AMS system. / Zabransky, Ronald J.; Di Nuzzo, Anthony R.; Huber, Mary Beth; Woods, Gail L.

In: Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1994, p. 113-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zabransky, Ronald J. ; Di Nuzzo, Anthony R. ; Huber, Mary Beth ; Woods, Gail L. / Detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci by the vitek AMS system. In: Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 1994 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 113-116.
@article{dde73f1c778e49fa8574c6b4ee6e4c7e,
title = "Detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci by the vitek AMS system",
abstract = "The ability of the Vitek AMS system to detect vancomycin resistance in enterococci was evaluated by comparing the results to an agar dilution screen method. Of 100 strains tested, 43 were resistant and 51 were susceptible by both tests. Two strains were intermediate by Vitek but susceptible by agar screen, one was intermediate by Vitek but resistant by agar screen, and four were susceptible by Vitek but resistant by agar screen. When the Vitek intermediate and resistant results were combined, the false resistant rate was 4.4{\%} and false susceptible rate was 8.5{\%}. In its current format, the Vitek system appears not to have acceptable accuracy for the detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci.",
author = "Zabransky, {Ronald J.} and {Di Nuzzo}, {Anthony R.} and Huber, {Mary Beth} and Woods, {Gail L.}",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1016/0732-8893(94)90102-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "113--116",
journal = "Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease",
issn = "0732-8893",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci by the vitek AMS system

AU - Zabransky, Ronald J.

AU - Di Nuzzo, Anthony R.

AU - Huber, Mary Beth

AU - Woods, Gail L.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - The ability of the Vitek AMS system to detect vancomycin resistance in enterococci was evaluated by comparing the results to an agar dilution screen method. Of 100 strains tested, 43 were resistant and 51 were susceptible by both tests. Two strains were intermediate by Vitek but susceptible by agar screen, one was intermediate by Vitek but resistant by agar screen, and four were susceptible by Vitek but resistant by agar screen. When the Vitek intermediate and resistant results were combined, the false resistant rate was 4.4% and false susceptible rate was 8.5%. In its current format, the Vitek system appears not to have acceptable accuracy for the detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci.

AB - The ability of the Vitek AMS system to detect vancomycin resistance in enterococci was evaluated by comparing the results to an agar dilution screen method. Of 100 strains tested, 43 were resistant and 51 were susceptible by both tests. Two strains were intermediate by Vitek but susceptible by agar screen, one was intermediate by Vitek but resistant by agar screen, and four were susceptible by Vitek but resistant by agar screen. When the Vitek intermediate and resistant results were combined, the false resistant rate was 4.4% and false susceptible rate was 8.5%. In its current format, the Vitek system appears not to have acceptable accuracy for the detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027986903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027986903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90102-3

DO - 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90102-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 7867304

AN - SCOPUS:0027986903

VL - 20

SP - 113

EP - 116

JO - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

JF - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

SN - 0732-8893

IS - 2

ER -