Determining paralysis prevalence in the United States

Michael H. Fox, Jennifer L. Rowland, Katherine Froehlich-Grobe, Dee Vernberg, Glen W. White, Lori Haskett

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Estimates of paralysis vary widely, largely owing to a lack of standard definition and nontargeted survey approaches. Like other poorly understood conditions such as fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, or chronic pain, paralysis falls outside the scope of clearly defined medical diagnosis, further complicating surveillance efforts. This inability to identify accurate prevalence makes developing policy interventions around the needs of many persons with these disabilities problematic. The objectives were to investigate how paralysis is being measured in the United States and to examine the validity of prevalence estimates based on current approaches. Methods: We reviewed existing measurement instruments and surveyed 139 agencies and organizations to determine how they capture paralysis data. Results: There is a widespread reliance on ICD coding or broad functional capabilities for most state or federal agencies. Many organizations serving consumers depend on state registries for discrete conditions in which paralysis is not directly measured. Conclusions: Improved paralysis prevalence data will benefit from a more functional definition consistent with ICF guidelines, which can be part of future surveillance efforts at state and federal levels.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)172-179
    Number of pages8
    JournalDisability and Health Journal
    Volume1
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 2008

    Fingerprint

    Paralysis
    Consumer Organizations
    Fibromyalgia
    Disabled Persons
    Chronic Pain
    Fatigue
    Registries
    Organizations
    Guidelines

    Keywords

    • Disability
    • ICF
    • Paralysis data
    • Prevalence

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Medicine(all)
    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Cite this

    Fox, M. H., Rowland, J. L., Froehlich-Grobe, K., Vernberg, D., White, G. W., & Haskett, L. (2008). Determining paralysis prevalence in the United States. Disability and Health Journal, 1(3), 172-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.05.003

    Determining paralysis prevalence in the United States. / Fox, Michael H.; Rowland, Jennifer L.; Froehlich-Grobe, Katherine; Vernberg, Dee; White, Glen W.; Haskett, Lori.

    In: Disability and Health Journal, Vol. 1, No. 3, 07.2008, p. 172-179.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Fox, MH, Rowland, JL, Froehlich-Grobe, K, Vernberg, D, White, GW & Haskett, L 2008, 'Determining paralysis prevalence in the United States', Disability and Health Journal, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 172-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.05.003
    Fox MH, Rowland JL, Froehlich-Grobe K, Vernberg D, White GW, Haskett L. Determining paralysis prevalence in the United States. Disability and Health Journal. 2008 Jul;1(3):172-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.05.003
    Fox, Michael H. ; Rowland, Jennifer L. ; Froehlich-Grobe, Katherine ; Vernberg, Dee ; White, Glen W. ; Haskett, Lori. / Determining paralysis prevalence in the United States. In: Disability and Health Journal. 2008 ; Vol. 1, No. 3. pp. 172-179.
    @article{1d68b1fefd5f4c5d81a6324c65ed4a2a,
    title = "Determining paralysis prevalence in the United States",
    abstract = "Background: Estimates of paralysis vary widely, largely owing to a lack of standard definition and nontargeted survey approaches. Like other poorly understood conditions such as fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, or chronic pain, paralysis falls outside the scope of clearly defined medical diagnosis, further complicating surveillance efforts. This inability to identify accurate prevalence makes developing policy interventions around the needs of many persons with these disabilities problematic. The objectives were to investigate how paralysis is being measured in the United States and to examine the validity of prevalence estimates based on current approaches. Methods: We reviewed existing measurement instruments and surveyed 139 agencies and organizations to determine how they capture paralysis data. Results: There is a widespread reliance on ICD coding or broad functional capabilities for most state or federal agencies. Many organizations serving consumers depend on state registries for discrete conditions in which paralysis is not directly measured. Conclusions: Improved paralysis prevalence data will benefit from a more functional definition consistent with ICF guidelines, which can be part of future surveillance efforts at state and federal levels.",
    keywords = "Disability, ICF, Paralysis data, Prevalence",
    author = "Fox, {Michael H.} and Rowland, {Jennifer L.} and Katherine Froehlich-Grobe and Dee Vernberg and White, {Glen W.} and Lori Haskett",
    year = "2008",
    month = "7",
    doi = "10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.05.003",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "1",
    pages = "172--179",
    journal = "Disability and Health Journal",
    issn = "1936-6574",
    publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Determining paralysis prevalence in the United States

    AU - Fox, Michael H.

    AU - Rowland, Jennifer L.

    AU - Froehlich-Grobe, Katherine

    AU - Vernberg, Dee

    AU - White, Glen W.

    AU - Haskett, Lori

    PY - 2008/7

    Y1 - 2008/7

    N2 - Background: Estimates of paralysis vary widely, largely owing to a lack of standard definition and nontargeted survey approaches. Like other poorly understood conditions such as fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, or chronic pain, paralysis falls outside the scope of clearly defined medical diagnosis, further complicating surveillance efforts. This inability to identify accurate prevalence makes developing policy interventions around the needs of many persons with these disabilities problematic. The objectives were to investigate how paralysis is being measured in the United States and to examine the validity of prevalence estimates based on current approaches. Methods: We reviewed existing measurement instruments and surveyed 139 agencies and organizations to determine how they capture paralysis data. Results: There is a widespread reliance on ICD coding or broad functional capabilities for most state or federal agencies. Many organizations serving consumers depend on state registries for discrete conditions in which paralysis is not directly measured. Conclusions: Improved paralysis prevalence data will benefit from a more functional definition consistent with ICF guidelines, which can be part of future surveillance efforts at state and federal levels.

    AB - Background: Estimates of paralysis vary widely, largely owing to a lack of standard definition and nontargeted survey approaches. Like other poorly understood conditions such as fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, or chronic pain, paralysis falls outside the scope of clearly defined medical diagnosis, further complicating surveillance efforts. This inability to identify accurate prevalence makes developing policy interventions around the needs of many persons with these disabilities problematic. The objectives were to investigate how paralysis is being measured in the United States and to examine the validity of prevalence estimates based on current approaches. Methods: We reviewed existing measurement instruments and surveyed 139 agencies and organizations to determine how they capture paralysis data. Results: There is a widespread reliance on ICD coding or broad functional capabilities for most state or federal agencies. Many organizations serving consumers depend on state registries for discrete conditions in which paralysis is not directly measured. Conclusions: Improved paralysis prevalence data will benefit from a more functional definition consistent with ICF guidelines, which can be part of future surveillance efforts at state and federal levels.

    KW - Disability

    KW - ICF

    KW - Paralysis data

    KW - Prevalence

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45449109800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45449109800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.05.003

    DO - 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.05.003

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 21122727

    AN - SCOPUS:45449109800

    VL - 1

    SP - 172

    EP - 179

    JO - Disability and Health Journal

    JF - Disability and Health Journal

    SN - 1936-6574

    IS - 3

    ER -