TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and satisfaction of a mentoring-match algorithm
AU - Oyesanya, Tolu O.
AU - Faieta, Julie
AU - Silveira, Stephanie L.
AU - Cogan, Alison M.
AU - Pappadis, Monique R.
AU - Ahonle, Zaccheus J.
AU - Backus, Deborah
AU - Kolakowsky-Hayner, Stephanie
AU - Roberts, Pamela
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The purpose of this study was to describe development, application, and satisfaction of a mentoring match algorithm created for the ACRM CDNG Leadership Mentoring Program. We conducted sequential, mixed methods evaluation of a mentoring-match algorithm. Interdisciplinary rehabilitation professionals participated in the program as mentees and mentors. We assessed mentoring matches made and frequency of mentees being matched with their first, second, or third recommended mentor. We also conducted focus groups to explore satisfaction with mentoring matches. There were 13 mentoring matches made (26 participants: 13 mentees and 13 mentors), including 7 mentees (53.8%) matched with their first recommended mentor, 5 (38.7%) with their second, and 1 (7.6%) with their third. Key qualitative findings included quality and structure of the mentoring matches and recommendations for improvements. This novel, interdisciplinary mentoring match algorithm shows promise for use across disciplines, settings, and organizations. More research is needed to evaluate program outcomes.
AB - The purpose of this study was to describe development, application, and satisfaction of a mentoring match algorithm created for the ACRM CDNG Leadership Mentoring Program. We conducted sequential, mixed methods evaluation of a mentoring-match algorithm. Interdisciplinary rehabilitation professionals participated in the program as mentees and mentors. We assessed mentoring matches made and frequency of mentees being matched with their first, second, or third recommended mentor. We also conducted focus groups to explore satisfaction with mentoring matches. There were 13 mentoring matches made (26 participants: 13 mentees and 13 mentors), including 7 mentees (53.8%) matched with their first recommended mentor, 5 (38.7%) with their second, and 1 (7.6%) with their third. Key qualitative findings included quality and structure of the mentoring matches and recommendations for improvements. This novel, interdisciplinary mentoring match algorithm shows promise for use across disciplines, settings, and organizations. More research is needed to evaluate program outcomes.
KW - health personnel
KW - leadership
KW - Mentoring
KW - physical and rehabilitation medicine
KW - research personnel
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009501907
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105009501907&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13611267.2025.2519908
DO - 10.1080/13611267.2025.2519908
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105009501907
SN - 1361-1267
JO - Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning
JF - Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning
ER -