Development of an outcomes management program at an academic medical center.

M. Morris, S. Jameson, S. Murdock, D. C. Hohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the advent of managed care, academic medical centers have been challenged to lower costs and to document their claims of high quality outcomes. A successful method to achieve these objectives must not interfere with the academic missions of research and teaching. At M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, we initiated a program that would reduce practice variability and increase quality with a model that was familiar to the faculty. METHODS: Professional staff members were divided into disease site groups that included physicians, nurses, and other allied health staff. Each group developed practice guidelines and Collaborative Care Paths, based on evidence in the publications and on expert opinion. Desired outcomes were prospectively defined during this process. Before implementation, paths and guidelines underwent peer review. RESULTS: The faculty actively participated in the development and implementation of the program that was viewed as a means of empowerment to deal with managed care. Nearly 1000 patients have been entered on the B8 paths that have been implemented to date. CONCLUSION: A physician-driven outcomes management program permits delivery of high quality care and supports outcomes research while decreasing cost in an academic setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)118-125
Number of pages8
JournalBest practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application
Volume1
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 1996

Fingerprint

Managed Care Programs
Physicians
Costs and Cost Analysis
Peer Review
Program Development
Quality of Health Care
Expert Testimony
Practice Guidelines
Publications
Teaching
Nurses
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Guidelines
Health
Research
Neoplasms
Power (Psychology)

Cite this

Development of an outcomes management program at an academic medical center. / Morris, M.; Jameson, S.; Murdock, S.; Hohn, D. C.

In: Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application, Vol. 1, No. 3, 05.1996, p. 118-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e827508be0944a9c8eab3f25b52718d1,
title = "Development of an outcomes management program at an academic medical center.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: With the advent of managed care, academic medical centers have been challenged to lower costs and to document their claims of high quality outcomes. A successful method to achieve these objectives must not interfere with the academic missions of research and teaching. At M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, we initiated a program that would reduce practice variability and increase quality with a model that was familiar to the faculty. METHODS: Professional staff members were divided into disease site groups that included physicians, nurses, and other allied health staff. Each group developed practice guidelines and Collaborative Care Paths, based on evidence in the publications and on expert opinion. Desired outcomes were prospectively defined during this process. Before implementation, paths and guidelines underwent peer review. RESULTS: The faculty actively participated in the development and implementation of the program that was viewed as a means of empowerment to deal with managed care. Nearly 1000 patients have been entered on the B8 paths that have been implemented to date. CONCLUSION: A physician-driven outcomes management program permits delivery of high quality care and supports outcomes research while decreasing cost in an academic setting.",
author = "M. Morris and S. Jameson and S. Murdock and Hohn, {D. C.}",
year = "1996",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "118--125",
journal = "Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application",
issn = "1085-0635",
publisher = "Mosby-Year Book Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of an outcomes management program at an academic medical center.

AU - Morris, M.

AU - Jameson, S.

AU - Murdock, S.

AU - Hohn, D. C.

PY - 1996/5

Y1 - 1996/5

N2 - BACKGROUND: With the advent of managed care, academic medical centers have been challenged to lower costs and to document their claims of high quality outcomes. A successful method to achieve these objectives must not interfere with the academic missions of research and teaching. At M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, we initiated a program that would reduce practice variability and increase quality with a model that was familiar to the faculty. METHODS: Professional staff members were divided into disease site groups that included physicians, nurses, and other allied health staff. Each group developed practice guidelines and Collaborative Care Paths, based on evidence in the publications and on expert opinion. Desired outcomes were prospectively defined during this process. Before implementation, paths and guidelines underwent peer review. RESULTS: The faculty actively participated in the development and implementation of the program that was viewed as a means of empowerment to deal with managed care. Nearly 1000 patients have been entered on the B8 paths that have been implemented to date. CONCLUSION: A physician-driven outcomes management program permits delivery of high quality care and supports outcomes research while decreasing cost in an academic setting.

AB - BACKGROUND: With the advent of managed care, academic medical centers have been challenged to lower costs and to document their claims of high quality outcomes. A successful method to achieve these objectives must not interfere with the academic missions of research and teaching. At M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, we initiated a program that would reduce practice variability and increase quality with a model that was familiar to the faculty. METHODS: Professional staff members were divided into disease site groups that included physicians, nurses, and other allied health staff. Each group developed practice guidelines and Collaborative Care Paths, based on evidence in the publications and on expert opinion. Desired outcomes were prospectively defined during this process. Before implementation, paths and guidelines underwent peer review. RESULTS: The faculty actively participated in the development and implementation of the program that was viewed as a means of empowerment to deal with managed care. Nearly 1000 patients have been entered on the B8 paths that have been implemented to date. CONCLUSION: A physician-driven outcomes management program permits delivery of high quality care and supports outcomes research while decreasing cost in an academic setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030132463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030132463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 118

EP - 125

JO - Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application

JF - Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application

SN - 1085-0635

IS - 3

ER -