Development of clinical process measures for pediatric burn care

Understanding variation in practice patterns

Lewis E. Kazis, Robert L. Sheridan, Gabriel D. Shapiro, Austin F. Lee, Matthew H. Liang, Colleen M. Ryan, Jeffrey C. Schneider, Martha Lydon, Marina Soley-Bori, Lily A. Sonis, Emily C. Dore, Tina Palmieri, David Herndon, Walter Meyer, Petra Warner, Richard Kagan, Frederick J. Stoddard, Michael Murphy, Ronald G. Tompkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND There has been little systematic examination of variation in pediatric burn care clinical practices and its effect on outcomes. As a first step, current clinical care processes need to be operationally defined. The highly specialized burn care units of the Shriners Hospitals for Children system present an opportunity to describe the processes of care. The aim of this study was to develop a set of process-based measures for pediatric burn care and examine adherence to them by providers in a cohort of pediatric burn patients. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature review to compile a set of process-based indicators. These measures were refined by an expert panel of burn care providers, yielding 36 process-based indicators in four clinical areas: initial evaluation and resuscitation, acute excisional surgery and critical care, psychosocial and pain control, and reconstruction and aftercare. We assessed variability in adherence to the indicators in a cohort of 1,076 children with burns at four regional pediatric burn programs in the Shriners Hospital system. The percentages of the cohort at each of the four sites were as follows: Boston, 20.8%; Cincinnati, 21.1%; Galveston, 36.0%; and Sacramento, 22.1%. The cohort included children who received care between 2006 and 2010. RESULTS Adherence to the process indicators varied both across sites and by clinical area. Adherence was lowest for the clinical areas of acute excisional surgery and critical care, with a range of 35% to 48% across sites, followed by initial evaluation and resuscitation (range, 34%-60%). In contrast, the clinical areas of psychosocial and pain control and reconstruction and aftercare had relatively high adherence across sites, with ranges of 62% to 93% and 71% to 87%, respectively. Of the 36 process indicators, 89% differed significantly in adherence between clinical sites (p < 0.05). Acute excisional surgery and critical care exhibited the most variability. CONCLUSION The development of this set of process-based measures represents an important step in the assessment of clinical practice in pediatric burn care. Substantial variation was observed in practices of pediatric burn care. However, further research is needed to link these process-based measures to clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)620-627
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume84
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Process Assessment (Health Care)
Pediatrics
Critical Care
Aftercare
Resuscitation
Burn Units
Pain
Burns
Research

Keywords

  • acute care
  • Burn care
  • pediatrics
  • practice variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Kazis, L. E., Sheridan, R. L., Shapiro, G. D., Lee, A. F., Liang, M. H., Ryan, C. M., ... Tompkins, R. G. (2018). Development of clinical process measures for pediatric burn care: Understanding variation in practice patterns. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 84(4), 620-627. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001737

Development of clinical process measures for pediatric burn care : Understanding variation in practice patterns. / Kazis, Lewis E.; Sheridan, Robert L.; Shapiro, Gabriel D.; Lee, Austin F.; Liang, Matthew H.; Ryan, Colleen M.; Schneider, Jeffrey C.; Lydon, Martha; Soley-Bori, Marina; Sonis, Lily A.; Dore, Emily C.; Palmieri, Tina; Herndon, David; Meyer, Walter; Warner, Petra; Kagan, Richard; Stoddard, Frederick J.; Murphy, Michael; Tompkins, Ronald G.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 84, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 620-627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kazis, LE, Sheridan, RL, Shapiro, GD, Lee, AF, Liang, MH, Ryan, CM, Schneider, JC, Lydon, M, Soley-Bori, M, Sonis, LA, Dore, EC, Palmieri, T, Herndon, D, Meyer, W, Warner, P, Kagan, R, Stoddard, FJ, Murphy, M & Tompkins, RG 2018, 'Development of clinical process measures for pediatric burn care: Understanding variation in practice patterns', Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 620-627. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001737
Kazis, Lewis E. ; Sheridan, Robert L. ; Shapiro, Gabriel D. ; Lee, Austin F. ; Liang, Matthew H. ; Ryan, Colleen M. ; Schneider, Jeffrey C. ; Lydon, Martha ; Soley-Bori, Marina ; Sonis, Lily A. ; Dore, Emily C. ; Palmieri, Tina ; Herndon, David ; Meyer, Walter ; Warner, Petra ; Kagan, Richard ; Stoddard, Frederick J. ; Murphy, Michael ; Tompkins, Ronald G. / Development of clinical process measures for pediatric burn care : Understanding variation in practice patterns. In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 84, No. 4. pp. 620-627.
@article{f385a4ac598b4972a30946915d3ecdb8,
title = "Development of clinical process measures for pediatric burn care: Understanding variation in practice patterns",
abstract = "BACKGROUND There has been little systematic examination of variation in pediatric burn care clinical practices and its effect on outcomes. As a first step, current clinical care processes need to be operationally defined. The highly specialized burn care units of the Shriners Hospitals for Children system present an opportunity to describe the processes of care. The aim of this study was to develop a set of process-based measures for pediatric burn care and examine adherence to them by providers in a cohort of pediatric burn patients. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature review to compile a set of process-based indicators. These measures were refined by an expert panel of burn care providers, yielding 36 process-based indicators in four clinical areas: initial evaluation and resuscitation, acute excisional surgery and critical care, psychosocial and pain control, and reconstruction and aftercare. We assessed variability in adherence to the indicators in a cohort of 1,076 children with burns at four regional pediatric burn programs in the Shriners Hospital system. The percentages of the cohort at each of the four sites were as follows: Boston, 20.8{\%}; Cincinnati, 21.1{\%}; Galveston, 36.0{\%}; and Sacramento, 22.1{\%}. The cohort included children who received care between 2006 and 2010. RESULTS Adherence to the process indicators varied both across sites and by clinical area. Adherence was lowest for the clinical areas of acute excisional surgery and critical care, with a range of 35{\%} to 48{\%} across sites, followed by initial evaluation and resuscitation (range, 34{\%}-60{\%}). In contrast, the clinical areas of psychosocial and pain control and reconstruction and aftercare had relatively high adherence across sites, with ranges of 62{\%} to 93{\%} and 71{\%} to 87{\%}, respectively. Of the 36 process indicators, 89{\%} differed significantly in adherence between clinical sites (p < 0.05). Acute excisional surgery and critical care exhibited the most variability. CONCLUSION The development of this set of process-based measures represents an important step in the assessment of clinical practice in pediatric burn care. Substantial variation was observed in practices of pediatric burn care. However, further research is needed to link these process-based measures to clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/care management, level IV.",
keywords = "acute care, Burn care, pediatrics, practice variation",
author = "Kazis, {Lewis E.} and Sheridan, {Robert L.} and Shapiro, {Gabriel D.} and Lee, {Austin F.} and Liang, {Matthew H.} and Ryan, {Colleen M.} and Schneider, {Jeffrey C.} and Martha Lydon and Marina Soley-Bori and Sonis, {Lily A.} and Dore, {Emily C.} and Tina Palmieri and David Herndon and Walter Meyer and Petra Warner and Richard Kagan and Stoddard, {Frederick J.} and Michael Murphy and Tompkins, {Ronald G.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0000000000001737",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "620--627",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of clinical process measures for pediatric burn care

T2 - Understanding variation in practice patterns

AU - Kazis, Lewis E.

AU - Sheridan, Robert L.

AU - Shapiro, Gabriel D.

AU - Lee, Austin F.

AU - Liang, Matthew H.

AU - Ryan, Colleen M.

AU - Schneider, Jeffrey C.

AU - Lydon, Martha

AU - Soley-Bori, Marina

AU - Sonis, Lily A.

AU - Dore, Emily C.

AU - Palmieri, Tina

AU - Herndon, David

AU - Meyer, Walter

AU - Warner, Petra

AU - Kagan, Richard

AU - Stoddard, Frederick J.

AU - Murphy, Michael

AU - Tompkins, Ronald G.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - BACKGROUND There has been little systematic examination of variation in pediatric burn care clinical practices and its effect on outcomes. As a first step, current clinical care processes need to be operationally defined. The highly specialized burn care units of the Shriners Hospitals for Children system present an opportunity to describe the processes of care. The aim of this study was to develop a set of process-based measures for pediatric burn care and examine adherence to them by providers in a cohort of pediatric burn patients. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature review to compile a set of process-based indicators. These measures were refined by an expert panel of burn care providers, yielding 36 process-based indicators in four clinical areas: initial evaluation and resuscitation, acute excisional surgery and critical care, psychosocial and pain control, and reconstruction and aftercare. We assessed variability in adherence to the indicators in a cohort of 1,076 children with burns at four regional pediatric burn programs in the Shriners Hospital system. The percentages of the cohort at each of the four sites were as follows: Boston, 20.8%; Cincinnati, 21.1%; Galveston, 36.0%; and Sacramento, 22.1%. The cohort included children who received care between 2006 and 2010. RESULTS Adherence to the process indicators varied both across sites and by clinical area. Adherence was lowest for the clinical areas of acute excisional surgery and critical care, with a range of 35% to 48% across sites, followed by initial evaluation and resuscitation (range, 34%-60%). In contrast, the clinical areas of psychosocial and pain control and reconstruction and aftercare had relatively high adherence across sites, with ranges of 62% to 93% and 71% to 87%, respectively. Of the 36 process indicators, 89% differed significantly in adherence between clinical sites (p < 0.05). Acute excisional surgery and critical care exhibited the most variability. CONCLUSION The development of this set of process-based measures represents an important step in the assessment of clinical practice in pediatric burn care. Substantial variation was observed in practices of pediatric burn care. However, further research is needed to link these process-based measures to clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

AB - BACKGROUND There has been little systematic examination of variation in pediatric burn care clinical practices and its effect on outcomes. As a first step, current clinical care processes need to be operationally defined. The highly specialized burn care units of the Shriners Hospitals for Children system present an opportunity to describe the processes of care. The aim of this study was to develop a set of process-based measures for pediatric burn care and examine adherence to them by providers in a cohort of pediatric burn patients. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature review to compile a set of process-based indicators. These measures were refined by an expert panel of burn care providers, yielding 36 process-based indicators in four clinical areas: initial evaluation and resuscitation, acute excisional surgery and critical care, psychosocial and pain control, and reconstruction and aftercare. We assessed variability in adherence to the indicators in a cohort of 1,076 children with burns at four regional pediatric burn programs in the Shriners Hospital system. The percentages of the cohort at each of the four sites were as follows: Boston, 20.8%; Cincinnati, 21.1%; Galveston, 36.0%; and Sacramento, 22.1%. The cohort included children who received care between 2006 and 2010. RESULTS Adherence to the process indicators varied both across sites and by clinical area. Adherence was lowest for the clinical areas of acute excisional surgery and critical care, with a range of 35% to 48% across sites, followed by initial evaluation and resuscitation (range, 34%-60%). In contrast, the clinical areas of psychosocial and pain control and reconstruction and aftercare had relatively high adherence across sites, with ranges of 62% to 93% and 71% to 87%, respectively. Of the 36 process indicators, 89% differed significantly in adherence between clinical sites (p < 0.05). Acute excisional surgery and critical care exhibited the most variability. CONCLUSION The development of this set of process-based measures represents an important step in the assessment of clinical practice in pediatric burn care. Substantial variation was observed in practices of pediatric burn care. However, further research is needed to link these process-based measures to clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

KW - acute care

KW - Burn care

KW - pediatrics

KW - practice variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044974132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044974132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000001737

DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000001737

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 620

EP - 627

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 4

ER -