TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnosis of Occlusion Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block and Paced Rhythms
AU - Khawaja, Muzamil
AU - Thakker, Janki
AU - Kherallah, Riyad
AU - Ye, Yumei
AU - Smith, Stephen W.
AU - Birnbaum, Yochai
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Purpose of Review: A number of criteria have been developed to aid with the diagnosis of occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and ventricular paced rhythms (VPR). The current guidelines do not provide clear preference for any specific ECG criteria in LBBB and paced rhythm patients. Recent Findings: This review delineates the difficulties of electrocardiographic diagnosis of OMI in both LBBB and VPR patients. We describe the original Sgarbossa and the newer criteria and their diagnostic performances. We highlight the expected changes of newer pacing modalities and how they may interfere with the electrocardiographic diagnosis of OMI. Summary: We recommend utilizing the Cai et al. algorithm, which combines clinical assessment with the Smith Modified Sgarbossa ECG criteria, for both LBBB and right ventricular pacing patients with suspected OMI. There is limited data concerning ECG changes of OMI in patients with the newer pacing modalities, such as biventricular, His-bundle, or left bundle branch pacing.
AB - Purpose of Review: A number of criteria have been developed to aid with the diagnosis of occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and ventricular paced rhythms (VPR). The current guidelines do not provide clear preference for any specific ECG criteria in LBBB and paced rhythm patients. Recent Findings: This review delineates the difficulties of electrocardiographic diagnosis of OMI in both LBBB and VPR patients. We describe the original Sgarbossa and the newer criteria and their diagnostic performances. We highlight the expected changes of newer pacing modalities and how they may interfere with the electrocardiographic diagnosis of OMI. Summary: We recommend utilizing the Cai et al. algorithm, which combines clinical assessment with the Smith Modified Sgarbossa ECG criteria, for both LBBB and right ventricular pacing patients with suspected OMI. There is limited data concerning ECG changes of OMI in patients with the newer pacing modalities, such as biventricular, His-bundle, or left bundle branch pacing.
KW - Left bundle branch block
KW - Occlusion myocardial infarction
KW - Right ventricular pacing
KW - ST-elevation myocardial infarction
KW - Sgarbossa criteria
KW - Smith-modified Sgarbossa criteria
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119454796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85119454796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11886-021-01613-0
DO - 10.1007/s11886-021-01613-0
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34791609
AN - SCOPUS:85119454796
SN - 1523-3782
VL - 23
JO - Current Cardiology Reports
JF - Current Cardiology Reports
IS - 12
M1 - 187
ER -