Diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability of 64-multislice 3D-CTA compared to intra-arterial DSA for intracranial aneurysms

B. Franklin, J. Gasco, T. Uribe, R. H A vonRitschl, E. Hauck

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    27 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Catheter-based intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) is widely trusted for diagnosing cerebral aneurysms. However, three-dimensional CT angiography (3D-CTA) is evolving. This study compares the diagnostic performance and inter-rater reliability of 64-slice 3D-CTA and IADSA. Nineteen patients with 26 suspected cerebral aneurysms (23 with confirmed aneurysms, three negative controls) underwent both IADSA and 3D-CTA. Two independent reviewers assessed both imaging modalities for the presence of an aneurysm and subsequently described aneurysmal location, size, shape, orientation, and number of emanating arteries. Inter-observer agreement was followed to control for observer bias. The sensitivity of 3D-CTA was 78% and 96%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 38% and 75%, and the accuracy of 3D-CTA was 81% and 96%. Both reviewers found 100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value (PPV). There was a clear correlation between 3D-CTA and IADSA for describing cerebral aneurysms. The authors conclude that 3D-CTA has equivocal diagnostic advantage but is less reliable for ruling out aneurysm presence. Anatomy, however, is superior with 3D-CTA.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)579-583
    Number of pages5
    JournalJournal of Clinical Neuroscience
    Volume17
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 2010

    Fingerprint

    Digital Subtraction Angiography
    Intracranial Aneurysm
    Aneurysm
    Observer Variation
    Anatomy
    Catheters
    Arteries

    Keywords

    • Computed tomography angiography
    • Digital subtraction angiography
    • Intracranial aneurysm

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Clinical Neurology
    • Neurology
    • Physiology (medical)

    Cite this

    Diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability of 64-multislice 3D-CTA compared to intra-arterial DSA for intracranial aneurysms. / Franklin, B.; Gasco, J.; Uribe, T.; vonRitschl, R. H A; Hauck, E.

    In: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 17, No. 5, 05.2010, p. 579-583.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Franklin, B. ; Gasco, J. ; Uribe, T. ; vonRitschl, R. H A ; Hauck, E. / Diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability of 64-multislice 3D-CTA compared to intra-arterial DSA for intracranial aneurysms. In: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2010 ; Vol. 17, No. 5. pp. 579-583.
    @article{3971dd0cf2fd4ca58b808334188a7cb6,
    title = "Diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability of 64-multislice 3D-CTA compared to intra-arterial DSA for intracranial aneurysms",
    abstract = "Catheter-based intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) is widely trusted for diagnosing cerebral aneurysms. However, three-dimensional CT angiography (3D-CTA) is evolving. This study compares the diagnostic performance and inter-rater reliability of 64-slice 3D-CTA and IADSA. Nineteen patients with 26 suspected cerebral aneurysms (23 with confirmed aneurysms, three negative controls) underwent both IADSA and 3D-CTA. Two independent reviewers assessed both imaging modalities for the presence of an aneurysm and subsequently described aneurysmal location, size, shape, orientation, and number of emanating arteries. Inter-observer agreement was followed to control for observer bias. The sensitivity of 3D-CTA was 78{\%} and 96{\%}, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 38{\%} and 75{\%}, and the accuracy of 3D-CTA was 81{\%} and 96{\%}. Both reviewers found 100{\%} specificity and 100{\%} positive predictive value (PPV). There was a clear correlation between 3D-CTA and IADSA for describing cerebral aneurysms. The authors conclude that 3D-CTA has equivocal diagnostic advantage but is less reliable for ruling out aneurysm presence. Anatomy, however, is superior with 3D-CTA.",
    keywords = "Computed tomography angiography, Digital subtraction angiography, Intracranial aneurysm",
    author = "B. Franklin and J. Gasco and T. Uribe and vonRitschl, {R. H A} and E. Hauck",
    year = "2010",
    month = "5",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jocn.2009.09.015",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "17",
    pages = "579--583",
    journal = "Journal of Clinical Neuroscience",
    issn = "0967-5868",
    publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater reliability of 64-multislice 3D-CTA compared to intra-arterial DSA for intracranial aneurysms

    AU - Franklin, B.

    AU - Gasco, J.

    AU - Uribe, T.

    AU - vonRitschl, R. H A

    AU - Hauck, E.

    PY - 2010/5

    Y1 - 2010/5

    N2 - Catheter-based intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) is widely trusted for diagnosing cerebral aneurysms. However, three-dimensional CT angiography (3D-CTA) is evolving. This study compares the diagnostic performance and inter-rater reliability of 64-slice 3D-CTA and IADSA. Nineteen patients with 26 suspected cerebral aneurysms (23 with confirmed aneurysms, three negative controls) underwent both IADSA and 3D-CTA. Two independent reviewers assessed both imaging modalities for the presence of an aneurysm and subsequently described aneurysmal location, size, shape, orientation, and number of emanating arteries. Inter-observer agreement was followed to control for observer bias. The sensitivity of 3D-CTA was 78% and 96%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 38% and 75%, and the accuracy of 3D-CTA was 81% and 96%. Both reviewers found 100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value (PPV). There was a clear correlation between 3D-CTA and IADSA for describing cerebral aneurysms. The authors conclude that 3D-CTA has equivocal diagnostic advantage but is less reliable for ruling out aneurysm presence. Anatomy, however, is superior with 3D-CTA.

    AB - Catheter-based intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) is widely trusted for diagnosing cerebral aneurysms. However, three-dimensional CT angiography (3D-CTA) is evolving. This study compares the diagnostic performance and inter-rater reliability of 64-slice 3D-CTA and IADSA. Nineteen patients with 26 suspected cerebral aneurysms (23 with confirmed aneurysms, three negative controls) underwent both IADSA and 3D-CTA. Two independent reviewers assessed both imaging modalities for the presence of an aneurysm and subsequently described aneurysmal location, size, shape, orientation, and number of emanating arteries. Inter-observer agreement was followed to control for observer bias. The sensitivity of 3D-CTA was 78% and 96%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 38% and 75%, and the accuracy of 3D-CTA was 81% and 96%. Both reviewers found 100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value (PPV). There was a clear correlation between 3D-CTA and IADSA for describing cerebral aneurysms. The authors conclude that 3D-CTA has equivocal diagnostic advantage but is less reliable for ruling out aneurysm presence. Anatomy, however, is superior with 3D-CTA.

    KW - Computed tomography angiography

    KW - Digital subtraction angiography

    KW - Intracranial aneurysm

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949913624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949913624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.09.015

    DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.09.015

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 20207150

    AN - SCOPUS:77949913624

    VL - 17

    SP - 579

    EP - 583

    JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

    JF - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

    SN - 0967-5868

    IS - 5

    ER -