TY - JOUR
T1 - Did we prioritize quality improvement in general surgery
T2 - Time for a focus on outcomes and enhanced recovery care plans?
AU - Hughes, Byron D.
AU - Sieloff, Eric
AU - Mehta, Hemalkumar B.
AU - Senagore, Anthony J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Background: In 2008, 2005–2006 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data were used to identify surgical operations contributing disproportionately to morbidity and mortality. Since then, numerous enhanced recovery programs have been utilized to augment quality improvement efforts. This study reassesses procedural complication incidence after a decade of quality improvement efforts. Methods: Data from the 2015 NSQIP were used. The same original 36 general surgery procedure groups were created using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Ninety percent of our 409,230 patients matched into a procedure group and adverse event rates were analyzed for each. Results: Ten procedure groups accounted for 80% of adverse events. Colectomy ranked the highest for adverse events (34%), readmissions (27%) and mortality rates (45.8%). For outpatient cholecystectomy, the relative percent point difference for adverse events has increased by 224% since 2005. Conclusion: Refocusing on colectomy and outpatient cholecystectomy represent current priorities in general surgery.
AB - Background: In 2008, 2005–2006 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data were used to identify surgical operations contributing disproportionately to morbidity and mortality. Since then, numerous enhanced recovery programs have been utilized to augment quality improvement efforts. This study reassesses procedural complication incidence after a decade of quality improvement efforts. Methods: Data from the 2015 NSQIP were used. The same original 36 general surgery procedure groups were created using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Ninety percent of our 409,230 patients matched into a procedure group and adverse event rates were analyzed for each. Results: Ten procedure groups accounted for 80% of adverse events. Colectomy ranked the highest for adverse events (34%), readmissions (27%) and mortality rates (45.8%). For outpatient cholecystectomy, the relative percent point difference for adverse events has increased by 224% since 2005. Conclusion: Refocusing on colectomy and outpatient cholecystectomy represent current priorities in general surgery.
KW - ERP
KW - General surgery
KW - NSQIP
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055673049&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055673049&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.10.022
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.10.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 30389116
AN - SCOPUS:85055673049
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 217
SP - 534
EP - 538
JO - American Journal of Surgery
JF - American Journal of Surgery
IS - 3
ER -