Differences in obesity management among physicians

Hemalkumar Mehta, Jeetvan Patel, Rohan Parikh, Susan Abughosh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the strong recommendations of guidelines, intensive obesity management is not offered to all obese patients. This study aimed to examine differences in obesity management between primary care physicians (PCPs) and non-PCPs. A cross-sectional study was performed using the 2006-2007 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Adults (age ≥ 20 years) with obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 or obesity diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 278) were included in the study cohort. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to examine differences between PCPs and non-PCPs (primary independent variable) for obesity management (dependent variable) while controlling for predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics per Anderson's behavioral model. In all, 32.66% of 214 million visits by obese patients in 2006-2007 resulted in obesity management. PCPs were 2.38 times more likely to provide obesity management compared to non-PCPs (odds ratio [OR] = 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.69, 3.36). Patients who had preventive visits (OR = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.50, 3.32) and chronic visits (OR = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.46, 2.55) were more likely to receive obesity management than patients who had acute visits. More time spent with physician, more comorbid conditions, and BMI ≥ 40 significantly increased the likelihood of receiving obesity management, while older age and smoking reduced the likelihood of receiving obesity management. Only one third of ambulatory care visits in 2006-2007 resulted in obesity management. A difference in obesity management was noted between PCPs and non-PCPs. Future research should aim to identify the reasons for these observed differences, ensure equitable access, and address the undertreatment of obesity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)287-292
Number of pages6
JournalPopulation Health Management
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Obesity
Physicians
Primary Care Physicians
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Body Mass Index
Logistic Models
Health Care Surveys
International Classification of Diseases
Ambulatory Care
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Smoking
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Leadership and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Mehta, H., Patel, J., Parikh, R., & Abughosh, S. (2012). Differences in obesity management among physicians. Population Health Management, 15(5), 287-292. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2011.0068

Differences in obesity management among physicians. / Mehta, Hemalkumar; Patel, Jeetvan; Parikh, Rohan; Abughosh, Susan.

In: Population Health Management, Vol. 15, No. 5, 01.10.2012, p. 287-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mehta, H, Patel, J, Parikh, R & Abughosh, S 2012, 'Differences in obesity management among physicians', Population Health Management, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 287-292. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2011.0068
Mehta, Hemalkumar ; Patel, Jeetvan ; Parikh, Rohan ; Abughosh, Susan. / Differences in obesity management among physicians. In: Population Health Management. 2012 ; Vol. 15, No. 5. pp. 287-292.
@article{5d720fb64ae44932b4f425fc19eef4a9,
title = "Differences in obesity management among physicians",
abstract = "Despite the strong recommendations of guidelines, intensive obesity management is not offered to all obese patients. This study aimed to examine differences in obesity management between primary care physicians (PCPs) and non-PCPs. A cross-sectional study was performed using the 2006-2007 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Adults (age ≥ 20 years) with obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 or obesity diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 278) were included in the study cohort. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to examine differences between PCPs and non-PCPs (primary independent variable) for obesity management (dependent variable) while controlling for predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics per Anderson's behavioral model. In all, 32.66{\%} of 214 million visits by obese patients in 2006-2007 resulted in obesity management. PCPs were 2.38 times more likely to provide obesity management compared to non-PCPs (odds ratio [OR] = 2.37; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI]: 1.69, 3.36). Patients who had preventive visits (OR = 2.23; 95{\%} CI: 1.50, 3.32) and chronic visits (OR = 1.93; 95{\%} CI: 1.46, 2.55) were more likely to receive obesity management than patients who had acute visits. More time spent with physician, more comorbid conditions, and BMI ≥ 40 significantly increased the likelihood of receiving obesity management, while older age and smoking reduced the likelihood of receiving obesity management. Only one third of ambulatory care visits in 2006-2007 resulted in obesity management. A difference in obesity management was noted between PCPs and non-PCPs. Future research should aim to identify the reasons for these observed differences, ensure equitable access, and address the undertreatment of obesity.",
author = "Hemalkumar Mehta and Jeetvan Patel and Rohan Parikh and Susan Abughosh",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/pop.2011.0068",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "287--292",
journal = "Population Health Management",
issn = "1942-7891",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in obesity management among physicians

AU - Mehta, Hemalkumar

AU - Patel, Jeetvan

AU - Parikh, Rohan

AU - Abughosh, Susan

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Despite the strong recommendations of guidelines, intensive obesity management is not offered to all obese patients. This study aimed to examine differences in obesity management between primary care physicians (PCPs) and non-PCPs. A cross-sectional study was performed using the 2006-2007 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Adults (age ≥ 20 years) with obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 or obesity diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 278) were included in the study cohort. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to examine differences between PCPs and non-PCPs (primary independent variable) for obesity management (dependent variable) while controlling for predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics per Anderson's behavioral model. In all, 32.66% of 214 million visits by obese patients in 2006-2007 resulted in obesity management. PCPs were 2.38 times more likely to provide obesity management compared to non-PCPs (odds ratio [OR] = 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.69, 3.36). Patients who had preventive visits (OR = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.50, 3.32) and chronic visits (OR = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.46, 2.55) were more likely to receive obesity management than patients who had acute visits. More time spent with physician, more comorbid conditions, and BMI ≥ 40 significantly increased the likelihood of receiving obesity management, while older age and smoking reduced the likelihood of receiving obesity management. Only one third of ambulatory care visits in 2006-2007 resulted in obesity management. A difference in obesity management was noted between PCPs and non-PCPs. Future research should aim to identify the reasons for these observed differences, ensure equitable access, and address the undertreatment of obesity.

AB - Despite the strong recommendations of guidelines, intensive obesity management is not offered to all obese patients. This study aimed to examine differences in obesity management between primary care physicians (PCPs) and non-PCPs. A cross-sectional study was performed using the 2006-2007 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Adults (age ≥ 20 years) with obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 or obesity diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 278) were included in the study cohort. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to examine differences between PCPs and non-PCPs (primary independent variable) for obesity management (dependent variable) while controlling for predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics per Anderson's behavioral model. In all, 32.66% of 214 million visits by obese patients in 2006-2007 resulted in obesity management. PCPs were 2.38 times more likely to provide obesity management compared to non-PCPs (odds ratio [OR] = 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.69, 3.36). Patients who had preventive visits (OR = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.50, 3.32) and chronic visits (OR = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.46, 2.55) were more likely to receive obesity management than patients who had acute visits. More time spent with physician, more comorbid conditions, and BMI ≥ 40 significantly increased the likelihood of receiving obesity management, while older age and smoking reduced the likelihood of receiving obesity management. Only one third of ambulatory care visits in 2006-2007 resulted in obesity management. A difference in obesity management was noted between PCPs and non-PCPs. Future research should aim to identify the reasons for these observed differences, ensure equitable access, and address the undertreatment of obesity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866333461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866333461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/pop.2011.0068

DO - 10.1089/pop.2011.0068

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 287

EP - 292

JO - Population Health Management

JF - Population Health Management

SN - 1942-7891

IS - 5

ER -