Differences in the Progression of Disability

A U.S.-Mexico Comparison

Carlos Díaz-Venegas, Timothy Reistetter, Rebeca Wong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives This article seeks to document the progression of disability in a developing country by implementing a model to examine how this process compares to a developed country. Methods Data come from the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), including a baseline survey in 2001 and a follow-up in 2003, and from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS), using the 2000 and 2002 waves. An ordinal logistic regression approach is used to examine a progression of disability that considers (a) no disability, (b) mobility problems, (c) mobility plus limitations with instrumental activities of daily living, (d) mobility plus limitations with activities of daily living (ADLs), (e) limitations in all three areas and (f) death. Results In both data sets, approximately 44% of the sample remained in the same level of disability at the 2-year follow-up. However, the progression of limitations with two disabilities differs by gender in the MHAS but is consistent for both men and women in the HRS. Discussion Our model reflects the importance of ADLs in the disablement process in Mexico. We speculate that the difference in lifetime risk profiles and cultural context might be responsible for the divergence in the progression of disability by gender.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)913-922
Number of pages10
JournalJournals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Volume73
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 14 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Activities of Daily Living
Mexico
Mobility Limitation
Retirement
disability
Health
Women's Health
health
Developed Countries
retirement
Developing Countries
Logistic Models
gender
divergence
logistics
developing country
death
regression

Keywords

  • Gender differences
  • HRS
  • Mexico
  • MHAS
  • Progression of disability
  • USA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

Differences in the Progression of Disability : A U.S.-Mexico Comparison. / Díaz-Venegas, Carlos; Reistetter, Timothy; Wong, Rebeca.

In: Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, Vol. 73, No. 5, 14.06.2018, p. 913-922.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bcea908a5c9d460ab757f28551c8b4c7,
title = "Differences in the Progression of Disability: A U.S.-Mexico Comparison",
abstract = "Objectives This article seeks to document the progression of disability in a developing country by implementing a model to examine how this process compares to a developed country. Methods Data come from the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), including a baseline survey in 2001 and a follow-up in 2003, and from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS), using the 2000 and 2002 waves. An ordinal logistic regression approach is used to examine a progression of disability that considers (a) no disability, (b) mobility problems, (c) mobility plus limitations with instrumental activities of daily living, (d) mobility plus limitations with activities of daily living (ADLs), (e) limitations in all three areas and (f) death. Results In both data sets, approximately 44{\%} of the sample remained in the same level of disability at the 2-year follow-up. However, the progression of limitations with two disabilities differs by gender in the MHAS but is consistent for both men and women in the HRS. Discussion Our model reflects the importance of ADLs in the disablement process in Mexico. We speculate that the difference in lifetime risk profiles and cultural context might be responsible for the divergence in the progression of disability by gender.",
keywords = "Gender differences, HRS, Mexico, MHAS, Progression of disability, USA",
author = "Carlos D{\'i}az-Venegas and Timothy Reistetter and Rebeca Wong",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1093/geronb/gbw082",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "913--922",
journal = "Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences",
issn = "1079-5014",
publisher = "Gerontological Society of America",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in the Progression of Disability

T2 - A U.S.-Mexico Comparison

AU - Díaz-Venegas, Carlos

AU - Reistetter, Timothy

AU - Wong, Rebeca

PY - 2018/6/14

Y1 - 2018/6/14

N2 - Objectives This article seeks to document the progression of disability in a developing country by implementing a model to examine how this process compares to a developed country. Methods Data come from the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), including a baseline survey in 2001 and a follow-up in 2003, and from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS), using the 2000 and 2002 waves. An ordinal logistic regression approach is used to examine a progression of disability that considers (a) no disability, (b) mobility problems, (c) mobility plus limitations with instrumental activities of daily living, (d) mobility plus limitations with activities of daily living (ADLs), (e) limitations in all three areas and (f) death. Results In both data sets, approximately 44% of the sample remained in the same level of disability at the 2-year follow-up. However, the progression of limitations with two disabilities differs by gender in the MHAS but is consistent for both men and women in the HRS. Discussion Our model reflects the importance of ADLs in the disablement process in Mexico. We speculate that the difference in lifetime risk profiles and cultural context might be responsible for the divergence in the progression of disability by gender.

AB - Objectives This article seeks to document the progression of disability in a developing country by implementing a model to examine how this process compares to a developed country. Methods Data come from the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), including a baseline survey in 2001 and a follow-up in 2003, and from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS), using the 2000 and 2002 waves. An ordinal logistic regression approach is used to examine a progression of disability that considers (a) no disability, (b) mobility problems, (c) mobility plus limitations with instrumental activities of daily living, (d) mobility plus limitations with activities of daily living (ADLs), (e) limitations in all three areas and (f) death. Results In both data sets, approximately 44% of the sample remained in the same level of disability at the 2-year follow-up. However, the progression of limitations with two disabilities differs by gender in the MHAS but is consistent for both men and women in the HRS. Discussion Our model reflects the importance of ADLs in the disablement process in Mexico. We speculate that the difference in lifetime risk profiles and cultural context might be responsible for the divergence in the progression of disability by gender.

KW - Gender differences

KW - HRS

KW - Mexico

KW - MHAS

KW - Progression of disability

KW - USA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048733086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048733086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/geronb/gbw082

DO - 10.1093/geronb/gbw082

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 913

EP - 922

JO - Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

JF - Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

SN - 1079-5014

IS - 5

ER -