Differential inhibition produced by peripheral conditioning stimulation on noxious mechanical and thermal responses of different classes of spinal neurons in the cat

Kwang Se Paik, Sang Chae Nam, Jin Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effect of conditioning stimulation of a peripheral nerve on responses of spinal neurons (dorsal horn cells and motoneurons) was studied in 16 decerebrate-spinal cats. The activity of dorsal horn cells was recorded with a microelectrode at the lumbosacral spinal cord and the single-unit activity of motoneurons was recorded from a filament of ventral rootlet divided from either the L7 or S1 ventral root. The responses of spinal neurons were evoked by noxious and innocuous mechanical stimuli and by noxious thermal stimuli applied to the receptive fields. The peripheral conditioning stimulation was applied to the tibial nerve with repetitive electrical pulses (2 Hz) at an intensity either suprathreshold for Aδ or C fibers for 5 min. Applying conditioning stimulation to a peripheral nerve produced a powerful inhibition of the responses elicited by noxious stimuli, suggesting this inhibition is an antinociceptive effect. The inhibition produced by peripheral conditioning stimulation was differentially greater on the responses to noxious than to innocuous stimuli. Based on the results obtained from conditioning stimulation with graded strengths, afferent inputs from both myelinated and unmyelinated fibers seem to contribute to the production of the antinociceptive effect. The magnitude of the antinociceptive effect is bigger for the responses to noxious thermal than to mechanical stimuli. Furthermore, the reflex activity recorded in motor axons seemed to be more sensitive than in dorsal horn cells to the antinociceptive effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)498-511
Number of pages14
JournalExperimental Neurology
Volume99
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1988

Fingerprint

Cats
Posterior Horn Cells
Hot Temperature
Neurons
Motor Neurons
Peripheral Nerves
Myelinated Nerve Fibers
Tibial Nerve
Unmyelinated Nerve Fibers
Spinal Nerve Roots
Microelectrodes
Axons
Reflex
Spinal Cord
Conditioning (Psychology)
Inhibition (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Neurology

Cite this

@article{566d85644f00424995dc44f7884e9e61,
title = "Differential inhibition produced by peripheral conditioning stimulation on noxious mechanical and thermal responses of different classes of spinal neurons in the cat",
abstract = "The effect of conditioning stimulation of a peripheral nerve on responses of spinal neurons (dorsal horn cells and motoneurons) was studied in 16 decerebrate-spinal cats. The activity of dorsal horn cells was recorded with a microelectrode at the lumbosacral spinal cord and the single-unit activity of motoneurons was recorded from a filament of ventral rootlet divided from either the L7 or S1 ventral root. The responses of spinal neurons were evoked by noxious and innocuous mechanical stimuli and by noxious thermal stimuli applied to the receptive fields. The peripheral conditioning stimulation was applied to the tibial nerve with repetitive electrical pulses (2 Hz) at an intensity either suprathreshold for Aδ or C fibers for 5 min. Applying conditioning stimulation to a peripheral nerve produced a powerful inhibition of the responses elicited by noxious stimuli, suggesting this inhibition is an antinociceptive effect. The inhibition produced by peripheral conditioning stimulation was differentially greater on the responses to noxious than to innocuous stimuli. Based on the results obtained from conditioning stimulation with graded strengths, afferent inputs from both myelinated and unmyelinated fibers seem to contribute to the production of the antinociceptive effect. The magnitude of the antinociceptive effect is bigger for the responses to noxious thermal than to mechanical stimuli. Furthermore, the reflex activity recorded in motor axons seemed to be more sensitive than in dorsal horn cells to the antinociceptive effect.",
author = "Paik, {Kwang Se} and Nam, {Sang Chae} and Jin Chung",
year = "1988",
doi = "10.1016/0014-4886(88)90166-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
pages = "498--511",
journal = "Experimental Neurology",
issn = "0014-4886",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential inhibition produced by peripheral conditioning stimulation on noxious mechanical and thermal responses of different classes of spinal neurons in the cat

AU - Paik, Kwang Se

AU - Nam, Sang Chae

AU - Chung, Jin

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - The effect of conditioning stimulation of a peripheral nerve on responses of spinal neurons (dorsal horn cells and motoneurons) was studied in 16 decerebrate-spinal cats. The activity of dorsal horn cells was recorded with a microelectrode at the lumbosacral spinal cord and the single-unit activity of motoneurons was recorded from a filament of ventral rootlet divided from either the L7 or S1 ventral root. The responses of spinal neurons were evoked by noxious and innocuous mechanical stimuli and by noxious thermal stimuli applied to the receptive fields. The peripheral conditioning stimulation was applied to the tibial nerve with repetitive electrical pulses (2 Hz) at an intensity either suprathreshold for Aδ or C fibers for 5 min. Applying conditioning stimulation to a peripheral nerve produced a powerful inhibition of the responses elicited by noxious stimuli, suggesting this inhibition is an antinociceptive effect. The inhibition produced by peripheral conditioning stimulation was differentially greater on the responses to noxious than to innocuous stimuli. Based on the results obtained from conditioning stimulation with graded strengths, afferent inputs from both myelinated and unmyelinated fibers seem to contribute to the production of the antinociceptive effect. The magnitude of the antinociceptive effect is bigger for the responses to noxious thermal than to mechanical stimuli. Furthermore, the reflex activity recorded in motor axons seemed to be more sensitive than in dorsal horn cells to the antinociceptive effect.

AB - The effect of conditioning stimulation of a peripheral nerve on responses of spinal neurons (dorsal horn cells and motoneurons) was studied in 16 decerebrate-spinal cats. The activity of dorsal horn cells was recorded with a microelectrode at the lumbosacral spinal cord and the single-unit activity of motoneurons was recorded from a filament of ventral rootlet divided from either the L7 or S1 ventral root. The responses of spinal neurons were evoked by noxious and innocuous mechanical stimuli and by noxious thermal stimuli applied to the receptive fields. The peripheral conditioning stimulation was applied to the tibial nerve with repetitive electrical pulses (2 Hz) at an intensity either suprathreshold for Aδ or C fibers for 5 min. Applying conditioning stimulation to a peripheral nerve produced a powerful inhibition of the responses elicited by noxious stimuli, suggesting this inhibition is an antinociceptive effect. The inhibition produced by peripheral conditioning stimulation was differentially greater on the responses to noxious than to innocuous stimuli. Based on the results obtained from conditioning stimulation with graded strengths, afferent inputs from both myelinated and unmyelinated fibers seem to contribute to the production of the antinociceptive effect. The magnitude of the antinociceptive effect is bigger for the responses to noxious thermal than to mechanical stimuli. Furthermore, the reflex activity recorded in motor axons seemed to be more sensitive than in dorsal horn cells to the antinociceptive effect.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023848546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023848546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0014-4886(88)90166-5

DO - 10.1016/0014-4886(88)90166-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 3338539

AN - SCOPUS:0023848546

VL - 99

SP - 498

EP - 511

JO - Experimental Neurology

JF - Experimental Neurology

SN - 0014-4886

IS - 2

ER -