Dilemmas in the diagnosis of blunt enteric trauma

Paul R. Kemmeter, Anthony J. Senagore, Dean Smith, Leon Oostendorp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Early identification of enteric injuries following blunt trauma relies on clinical examination, diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), and/or computed tomography (CT) scan. Limitations in each approach may result in diagnostic delays and potentially increased complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of early DPL and CT scans in identifying enteric injuries requiring surgical repair and to determine the impact of injury time to definitive repair on complication rates. A retrospective review of patients admitted to the Butterworth Hospital Level I Trauma Center between January 1,1990 and December 31, 1996 identified 69 appropriate patients. Three study groups were treated as follows: laparotomy on clinical examination (N = 7), laparotomy after initial DPL (N = 28), and laparotomy after initial CT (N = 34). Early DPL missed 5 (18%) enteric injuries, which was significantly fewer than the 13 (38%) missed by CT scan. Review of these 13 CT scans revealed 6 examinations not suggesting enteric injury and 7 with signs suggestive of injury. Four injuries missed by CT subsequently were found by delayed DPL. Morbidity rates in either group increased when injury time to definitive repair was >24 hours (18-50%). The results indicate that early DPL and CT have limitations in blunt enteric injuries. However, morbidity and mortality rates did not increase until repair was delayed >24 hours postinjury. Also, delayed DPL successfully identified these injuries in four patients after negative CT. Therefore, in patients at high risk for enteric injuries, there may be a role for delayed or repeat DPL after an initially negative DPL or CT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)750-754
Number of pages5
JournalThe American surgeon
Volume64
Issue number8
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Peritoneal Lavage
Tomography
Wounds and Injuries
Laparotomy
Nonpenetrating Wounds
Morbidity
Trauma Centers
Intraoperative Complications

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Kemmeter, P. R., Senagore, A. J., Smith, D., & Oostendorp, L. (1998). Dilemmas in the diagnosis of blunt enteric trauma. The American surgeon, 64(8), 750-754.

Dilemmas in the diagnosis of blunt enteric trauma. / Kemmeter, Paul R.; Senagore, Anthony J.; Smith, Dean; Oostendorp, Leon.

In: The American surgeon, Vol. 64, No. 8, 1998, p. 750-754.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kemmeter, PR, Senagore, AJ, Smith, D & Oostendorp, L 1998, 'Dilemmas in the diagnosis of blunt enteric trauma', The American surgeon, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 750-754.
Kemmeter PR, Senagore AJ, Smith D, Oostendorp L. Dilemmas in the diagnosis of blunt enteric trauma. The American surgeon. 1998;64(8):750-754.
Kemmeter, Paul R. ; Senagore, Anthony J. ; Smith, Dean ; Oostendorp, Leon. / Dilemmas in the diagnosis of blunt enteric trauma. In: The American surgeon. 1998 ; Vol. 64, No. 8. pp. 750-754.
@article{46cd6095cb304f1b943a6fd2f5f4b961,
title = "Dilemmas in the diagnosis of blunt enteric trauma",
abstract = "Early identification of enteric injuries following blunt trauma relies on clinical examination, diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), and/or computed tomography (CT) scan. Limitations in each approach may result in diagnostic delays and potentially increased complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of early DPL and CT scans in identifying enteric injuries requiring surgical repair and to determine the impact of injury time to definitive repair on complication rates. A retrospective review of patients admitted to the Butterworth Hospital Level I Trauma Center between January 1,1990 and December 31, 1996 identified 69 appropriate patients. Three study groups were treated as follows: laparotomy on clinical examination (N = 7), laparotomy after initial DPL (N = 28), and laparotomy after initial CT (N = 34). Early DPL missed 5 (18{\%}) enteric injuries, which was significantly fewer than the 13 (38{\%}) missed by CT scan. Review of these 13 CT scans revealed 6 examinations not suggesting enteric injury and 7 with signs suggestive of injury. Four injuries missed by CT subsequently were found by delayed DPL. Morbidity rates in either group increased when injury time to definitive repair was >24 hours (18-50{\%}). The results indicate that early DPL and CT have limitations in blunt enteric injuries. However, morbidity and mortality rates did not increase until repair was delayed >24 hours postinjury. Also, delayed DPL successfully identified these injuries in four patients after negative CT. Therefore, in patients at high risk for enteric injuries, there may be a role for delayed or repeat DPL after an initially negative DPL or CT.",
author = "Kemmeter, {Paul R.} and Senagore, {Anthony J.} and Dean Smith and Leon Oostendorp",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "750--754",
journal = "The American surgeon",
issn = "0003-1348",
publisher = "Southeastern Surgical Congress",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dilemmas in the diagnosis of blunt enteric trauma

AU - Kemmeter, Paul R.

AU - Senagore, Anthony J.

AU - Smith, Dean

AU - Oostendorp, Leon

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Early identification of enteric injuries following blunt trauma relies on clinical examination, diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), and/or computed tomography (CT) scan. Limitations in each approach may result in diagnostic delays and potentially increased complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of early DPL and CT scans in identifying enteric injuries requiring surgical repair and to determine the impact of injury time to definitive repair on complication rates. A retrospective review of patients admitted to the Butterworth Hospital Level I Trauma Center between January 1,1990 and December 31, 1996 identified 69 appropriate patients. Three study groups were treated as follows: laparotomy on clinical examination (N = 7), laparotomy after initial DPL (N = 28), and laparotomy after initial CT (N = 34). Early DPL missed 5 (18%) enteric injuries, which was significantly fewer than the 13 (38%) missed by CT scan. Review of these 13 CT scans revealed 6 examinations not suggesting enteric injury and 7 with signs suggestive of injury. Four injuries missed by CT subsequently were found by delayed DPL. Morbidity rates in either group increased when injury time to definitive repair was >24 hours (18-50%). The results indicate that early DPL and CT have limitations in blunt enteric injuries. However, morbidity and mortality rates did not increase until repair was delayed >24 hours postinjury. Also, delayed DPL successfully identified these injuries in four patients after negative CT. Therefore, in patients at high risk for enteric injuries, there may be a role for delayed or repeat DPL after an initially negative DPL or CT.

AB - Early identification of enteric injuries following blunt trauma relies on clinical examination, diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), and/or computed tomography (CT) scan. Limitations in each approach may result in diagnostic delays and potentially increased complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of early DPL and CT scans in identifying enteric injuries requiring surgical repair and to determine the impact of injury time to definitive repair on complication rates. A retrospective review of patients admitted to the Butterworth Hospital Level I Trauma Center between January 1,1990 and December 31, 1996 identified 69 appropriate patients. Three study groups were treated as follows: laparotomy on clinical examination (N = 7), laparotomy after initial DPL (N = 28), and laparotomy after initial CT (N = 34). Early DPL missed 5 (18%) enteric injuries, which was significantly fewer than the 13 (38%) missed by CT scan. Review of these 13 CT scans revealed 6 examinations not suggesting enteric injury and 7 with signs suggestive of injury. Four injuries missed by CT subsequently were found by delayed DPL. Morbidity rates in either group increased when injury time to definitive repair was >24 hours (18-50%). The results indicate that early DPL and CT have limitations in blunt enteric injuries. However, morbidity and mortality rates did not increase until repair was delayed >24 hours postinjury. Also, delayed DPL successfully identified these injuries in four patients after negative CT. Therefore, in patients at high risk for enteric injuries, there may be a role for delayed or repeat DPL after an initially negative DPL or CT.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031904558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031904558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9697905

AN - SCOPUS:0031904558

VL - 64

SP - 750

EP - 754

JO - The American surgeon

JF - The American surgeon

SN - 0003-1348

IS - 8

ER -