Discriminative versus evaluative assessment

some observations on goal attainment scaling.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Goal attainment scaling has been described in the rehabilitation literature as a method of evaluation designed to monitor client progress, structure team conferences, and provide information on overall program evaluation. The appropriate use of goal attainment scaling in clinical environments depends on a clear understanding of its strengths and weaknesses. The primary strength of goal attainment scaling is the ability to evaluate individualized longitudinal change. Goal attainment scaling is not a methodology designed to assess functional status. Confusion occurs when evaluation tools designed to discriminate between persons (determine status) are used to assess change in individual patients over time. This paper describes the strengths and weaknesses of goal attainment scaling as a methodology for evaluating clinical change. The process of evaluative assessment with goal attainment scaling is compared to discriminative assessment where the purpose is to distinguish between persons or to classify persons into predefined categories.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)349-354
Number of pages6
JournalThe American journal of occupational therapy. : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association
Volume47
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Process Assessment (Health Care)
Program Evaluation
Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

@article{e3b70a21e4ea4db1a46162dff9389661,
title = "Discriminative versus evaluative assessment: some observations on goal attainment scaling.",
abstract = "Goal attainment scaling has been described in the rehabilitation literature as a method of evaluation designed to monitor client progress, structure team conferences, and provide information on overall program evaluation. The appropriate use of goal attainment scaling in clinical environments depends on a clear understanding of its strengths and weaknesses. The primary strength of goal attainment scaling is the ability to evaluate individualized longitudinal change. Goal attainment scaling is not a methodology designed to assess functional status. Confusion occurs when evaluation tools designed to discriminate between persons (determine status) are used to assess change in individual patients over time. This paper describes the strengths and weaknesses of goal attainment scaling as a methodology for evaluating clinical change. The process of evaluative assessment with goal attainment scaling is compared to discriminative assessment where the purpose is to distinguish between persons or to classify persons into predefined categories.",
author = "Kenneth Ottenbacher and A. Cusick",
year = "1993",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "349--354",
journal = "American Journal of Occupational Therapy",
issn = "0272-9490",
publisher = "American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discriminative versus evaluative assessment

T2 - some observations on goal attainment scaling.

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

AU - Cusick, A.

PY - 1993/4

Y1 - 1993/4

N2 - Goal attainment scaling has been described in the rehabilitation literature as a method of evaluation designed to monitor client progress, structure team conferences, and provide information on overall program evaluation. The appropriate use of goal attainment scaling in clinical environments depends on a clear understanding of its strengths and weaknesses. The primary strength of goal attainment scaling is the ability to evaluate individualized longitudinal change. Goal attainment scaling is not a methodology designed to assess functional status. Confusion occurs when evaluation tools designed to discriminate between persons (determine status) are used to assess change in individual patients over time. This paper describes the strengths and weaknesses of goal attainment scaling as a methodology for evaluating clinical change. The process of evaluative assessment with goal attainment scaling is compared to discriminative assessment where the purpose is to distinguish between persons or to classify persons into predefined categories.

AB - Goal attainment scaling has been described in the rehabilitation literature as a method of evaluation designed to monitor client progress, structure team conferences, and provide information on overall program evaluation. The appropriate use of goal attainment scaling in clinical environments depends on a clear understanding of its strengths and weaknesses. The primary strength of goal attainment scaling is the ability to evaluate individualized longitudinal change. Goal attainment scaling is not a methodology designed to assess functional status. Confusion occurs when evaluation tools designed to discriminate between persons (determine status) are used to assess change in individual patients over time. This paper describes the strengths and weaknesses of goal attainment scaling as a methodology for evaluating clinical change. The process of evaluative assessment with goal attainment scaling is compared to discriminative assessment where the purpose is to distinguish between persons or to classify persons into predefined categories.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027582525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027582525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 349

EP - 354

JO - American Journal of Occupational Therapy

JF - American Journal of Occupational Therapy

SN - 0272-9490

IS - 4

ER -