Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome?

Sergio Casillas, Conor P. Delaney, Anthony J. Senagore, Karen Brady, Victor W. Fazio

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    105 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    PURPOSE: Conversion during laparoscopic colectomy varies in frequency according to the surgeon's experience and case selection. However, there remains concern that conversion is associated with increased morbidity and higher hospital costs. METHODS: From January 1999 to August 2002, 430 laparoscopic colectomies were performed by two surgeons, with 51 (12 percent) cases converted to open surgery. Converted cases were matched for operation and age to 51 open cases performed mostly by other colorectal surgeons from our department. Data collected included gender, American Society of Anesthesiology score, operative indication, resection type, operative stage at conversion, in-hospital complications, direct hospital costs, unexpected readmission within 30 days, and mortality. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups for age (converted, 55 ± 19; open, 62 ± 16), male:female ratio (converted, 17:34; open, 23:28), or American Society of Anesthesiology score distribution. Indications for surgery were neoplasia (converted, 16; open, 31); diverticular disease (converted, 21; open, 13); Crohn's disease (converted, 12; open, 5); and other disease (converted, 2; open, 2). Operative times were similar (converted, 150 ± 56 minutes; open, 132 ± 48 minutes). Conversions occurred before defining the major vascular pedicle/ureter (50 percent), in relation to intracorporeal vascular ligation (15 percent), or during bowel transection or presacral dissection (35 percent). Specific indications for conversion were technical (41 percent), followed by adhesions (33 percent), phlegmon or abscess (23 percent), bleeding (6 percent), and failure to identify the ureter (6 percent). Median hospital stay was five days for both groups. In-hospital complications (converted 11.6 percent; open 8 percent), 30-day readmission rate (converted 13 percent vs. open 8 percent), and direct costs were similar between groups. There were no mortalities. CONCLUSION: Conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy does not result in inappropriately prolonged operative times, increased morbidity or length of stay, increased direct costs, or unexpected readmissions compared with similarly complex laparotomies. A policy of commencing most cases suitable for a laparoscopic approach laparoscopically offers patients the benefits of a laparoscopic colectomy without adversely affecting perioperative risks.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1680-1685
    Number of pages6
    JournalDiseases of the Colon and Rectum
    Volume47
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 1 2004

    Keywords

    • Conversion
    • Direct costs
    • Hospital stay
    • Laparoscopic colectomy
    • Morbidity
    • Mortality
    • Open colectomy
    • Operative times

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Gastroenterology

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this