“Doing something” about the cesarean delivery rate

Steven L. Clark, Thomas J. Garite, Emily F. Hamilton, Michael A. Belfort, Gary Hankins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a general consensus that the cesarean delivery rate in the United States is too high, and that practice patterns of obstetricians are largely to blame for this situation. In reality, the US cesarean delivery rate is the result of 3 forces largely beyond the control of the practicing clinician: patient expectations and misconceptions regarding the safety of labor, the medical-legal system, and limitations in technology. Efforts to “do something” about the cesarean delivery rate by promulgating practice directives that are marginally evidence-based or influenced by social pressures are both ineffective and potentially harmful. We examine both the recent American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)/Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Care Consensus Statement “Safe Prevention of Primary Cesarean Delivery” document and the various iterations of the ACOG guidelines for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in this context. Adherence to arbitrary time limits for active phase or second-stage arrest without incorporating other clinical factors into the decision-making process is unwise. In a similar manner, ever-changing practice standards for vaginal birth after cesarean driven by factors other than changing data are unlikely to be effective in lowering the cesarean delivery rate. Whether too high or too low, the current US cesarean delivery rate is the expected result of the unique demographic, geographic, and social forces driving it and is unlikely to change significantly given the limitations of current technology to otherwise satisfy the demands of these forces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-271
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume219
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Vaginal Birth after Cesarean
Consensus
Technology
Primary Prevention
Decision Making
Demography
Guidelines
Safety
Pressure

Keywords

  • cesarean delivery rate
  • labor arrest
  • vaginal birth after cesarean

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Clark, S. L., Garite, T. J., Hamilton, E. F., Belfort, M. A., & Hankins, G. (2018). “Doing something” about the cesarean delivery rate. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 219(3), 267-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.044

“Doing something” about the cesarean delivery rate. / Clark, Steven L.; Garite, Thomas J.; Hamilton, Emily F.; Belfort, Michael A.; Hankins, Gary.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 219, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 267-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Clark, SL, Garite, TJ, Hamilton, EF, Belfort, MA & Hankins, G 2018, '“Doing something” about the cesarean delivery rate', American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 219, no. 3, pp. 267-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.044
Clark, Steven L. ; Garite, Thomas J. ; Hamilton, Emily F. ; Belfort, Michael A. ; Hankins, Gary. / “Doing something” about the cesarean delivery rate. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018 ; Vol. 219, No. 3. pp. 267-271.
@article{be3e211b6ab443eeba2aa24384701ca2,
title = "“Doing something” about the cesarean delivery rate",
abstract = "There is a general consensus that the cesarean delivery rate in the United States is too high, and that practice patterns of obstetricians are largely to blame for this situation. In reality, the US cesarean delivery rate is the result of 3 forces largely beyond the control of the practicing clinician: patient expectations and misconceptions regarding the safety of labor, the medical-legal system, and limitations in technology. Efforts to “do something” about the cesarean delivery rate by promulgating practice directives that are marginally evidence-based or influenced by social pressures are both ineffective and potentially harmful. We examine both the recent American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)/Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Care Consensus Statement “Safe Prevention of Primary Cesarean Delivery” document and the various iterations of the ACOG guidelines for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in this context. Adherence to arbitrary time limits for active phase or second-stage arrest without incorporating other clinical factors into the decision-making process is unwise. In a similar manner, ever-changing practice standards for vaginal birth after cesarean driven by factors other than changing data are unlikely to be effective in lowering the cesarean delivery rate. Whether too high or too low, the current US cesarean delivery rate is the expected result of the unique demographic, geographic, and social forces driving it and is unlikely to change significantly given the limitations of current technology to otherwise satisfy the demands of these forces.",
keywords = "cesarean delivery rate, labor arrest, vaginal birth after cesarean",
author = "Clark, {Steven L.} and Garite, {Thomas J.} and Hamilton, {Emily F.} and Belfort, {Michael A.} and Gary Hankins",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "219",
pages = "267--271",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Doing something” about the cesarean delivery rate

AU - Clark, Steven L.

AU - Garite, Thomas J.

AU - Hamilton, Emily F.

AU - Belfort, Michael A.

AU - Hankins, Gary

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - There is a general consensus that the cesarean delivery rate in the United States is too high, and that practice patterns of obstetricians are largely to blame for this situation. In reality, the US cesarean delivery rate is the result of 3 forces largely beyond the control of the practicing clinician: patient expectations and misconceptions regarding the safety of labor, the medical-legal system, and limitations in technology. Efforts to “do something” about the cesarean delivery rate by promulgating practice directives that are marginally evidence-based or influenced by social pressures are both ineffective and potentially harmful. We examine both the recent American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)/Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Care Consensus Statement “Safe Prevention of Primary Cesarean Delivery” document and the various iterations of the ACOG guidelines for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in this context. Adherence to arbitrary time limits for active phase or second-stage arrest without incorporating other clinical factors into the decision-making process is unwise. In a similar manner, ever-changing practice standards for vaginal birth after cesarean driven by factors other than changing data are unlikely to be effective in lowering the cesarean delivery rate. Whether too high or too low, the current US cesarean delivery rate is the expected result of the unique demographic, geographic, and social forces driving it and is unlikely to change significantly given the limitations of current technology to otherwise satisfy the demands of these forces.

AB - There is a general consensus that the cesarean delivery rate in the United States is too high, and that practice patterns of obstetricians are largely to blame for this situation. In reality, the US cesarean delivery rate is the result of 3 forces largely beyond the control of the practicing clinician: patient expectations and misconceptions regarding the safety of labor, the medical-legal system, and limitations in technology. Efforts to “do something” about the cesarean delivery rate by promulgating practice directives that are marginally evidence-based or influenced by social pressures are both ineffective and potentially harmful. We examine both the recent American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)/Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Care Consensus Statement “Safe Prevention of Primary Cesarean Delivery” document and the various iterations of the ACOG guidelines for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in this context. Adherence to arbitrary time limits for active phase or second-stage arrest without incorporating other clinical factors into the decision-making process is unwise. In a similar manner, ever-changing practice standards for vaginal birth after cesarean driven by factors other than changing data are unlikely to be effective in lowering the cesarean delivery rate. Whether too high or too low, the current US cesarean delivery rate is the expected result of the unique demographic, geographic, and social forces driving it and is unlikely to change significantly given the limitations of current technology to otherwise satisfy the demands of these forces.

KW - cesarean delivery rate

KW - labor arrest

KW - vaginal birth after cesarean

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047933740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047933740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.044

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.044

M3 - Article

VL - 219

SP - 267

EP - 271

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 3

ER -