Domains of masculine gender role stress and intimate partner violence in a clinical sample of violent men

Todd M. Moore, Gregory L. Stuart, James K. McNulty, Michael E. Addis, James V. Cordova, Jeffrey Temple

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between the specific factors of the Masculine Gender Role Stress (MGRS) scale and intimate partner violence among a clinical sample of violent men. Participants were 339 men court-mandated to attend violence intervention programs. After demonstrating that the 5-factor MGRS model evidenced strong fit in this sample, analyses revealed that MGRS total scores were associated with each form of intimate partner violence perpetration. However, subsequent analyses that regressed each form of aggression onto all 5 MGRS factors simultaneously revealed that different factors were responsible for each association. Specifically, gender role stress regarding failure to perform in work and sexual domains was the only factor associated with psychological aggression, gender role stress regarding appearing physically fit and not appearing feminine was the only factor associated with sexual coercion, and gender role stress regarding intellectual inferiority was the only factor associated with injury to partners. No single MGRS factor was uniquely associated with physical aggression. Implications are discussed in terms of the importance of examining specific domains of gender role stress when studying and treating partner violence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-75
Number of pages8
JournalPsychology of Violence
Volume1
Issue numberSUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2010

Fingerprint

gender role
violence
Aggression
aggression
Violence
Coercion
Intimate Partner Violence
Psychology
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • intimate partner violence
  • masculine gender role stress
  • violence intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Domains of masculine gender role stress and intimate partner violence in a clinical sample of violent men. / Moore, Todd M.; Stuart, Gregory L.; McNulty, James K.; Addis, Michael E.; Cordova, James V.; Temple, Jeffrey.

In: Psychology of Violence, Vol. 1, No. SUPPL., 08.2010, p. 68-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moore, Todd M. ; Stuart, Gregory L. ; McNulty, James K. ; Addis, Michael E. ; Cordova, James V. ; Temple, Jeffrey. / Domains of masculine gender role stress and intimate partner violence in a clinical sample of violent men. In: Psychology of Violence. 2010 ; Vol. 1, No. SUPPL. pp. 68-75.
@article{60c531b3b9c9451cba52bf15b399f8be,
title = "Domains of masculine gender role stress and intimate partner violence in a clinical sample of violent men",
abstract = "This study investigated the relationship between the specific factors of the Masculine Gender Role Stress (MGRS) scale and intimate partner violence among a clinical sample of violent men. Participants were 339 men court-mandated to attend violence intervention programs. After demonstrating that the 5-factor MGRS model evidenced strong fit in this sample, analyses revealed that MGRS total scores were associated with each form of intimate partner violence perpetration. However, subsequent analyses that regressed each form of aggression onto all 5 MGRS factors simultaneously revealed that different factors were responsible for each association. Specifically, gender role stress regarding failure to perform in work and sexual domains was the only factor associated with psychological aggression, gender role stress regarding appearing physically fit and not appearing feminine was the only factor associated with sexual coercion, and gender role stress regarding intellectual inferiority was the only factor associated with injury to partners. No single MGRS factor was uniquely associated with physical aggression. Implications are discussed in terms of the importance of examining specific domains of gender role stress when studying and treating partner violence.",
keywords = "intimate partner violence, masculine gender role stress, violence intervention",
author = "Moore, {Todd M.} and Stuart, {Gregory L.} and McNulty, {James K.} and Addis, {Michael E.} and Cordova, {James V.} and Jeffrey Temple",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1037/2152-0828.1.S.68",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "68--75",
journal = "Psychology of Violence",
issn = "2152-0828",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Domains of masculine gender role stress and intimate partner violence in a clinical sample of violent men

AU - Moore, Todd M.

AU - Stuart, Gregory L.

AU - McNulty, James K.

AU - Addis, Michael E.

AU - Cordova, James V.

AU - Temple, Jeffrey

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - This study investigated the relationship between the specific factors of the Masculine Gender Role Stress (MGRS) scale and intimate partner violence among a clinical sample of violent men. Participants were 339 men court-mandated to attend violence intervention programs. After demonstrating that the 5-factor MGRS model evidenced strong fit in this sample, analyses revealed that MGRS total scores were associated with each form of intimate partner violence perpetration. However, subsequent analyses that regressed each form of aggression onto all 5 MGRS factors simultaneously revealed that different factors were responsible for each association. Specifically, gender role stress regarding failure to perform in work and sexual domains was the only factor associated with psychological aggression, gender role stress regarding appearing physically fit and not appearing feminine was the only factor associated with sexual coercion, and gender role stress regarding intellectual inferiority was the only factor associated with injury to partners. No single MGRS factor was uniquely associated with physical aggression. Implications are discussed in terms of the importance of examining specific domains of gender role stress when studying and treating partner violence.

AB - This study investigated the relationship between the specific factors of the Masculine Gender Role Stress (MGRS) scale and intimate partner violence among a clinical sample of violent men. Participants were 339 men court-mandated to attend violence intervention programs. After demonstrating that the 5-factor MGRS model evidenced strong fit in this sample, analyses revealed that MGRS total scores were associated with each form of intimate partner violence perpetration. However, subsequent analyses that regressed each form of aggression onto all 5 MGRS factors simultaneously revealed that different factors were responsible for each association. Specifically, gender role stress regarding failure to perform in work and sexual domains was the only factor associated with psychological aggression, gender role stress regarding appearing physically fit and not appearing feminine was the only factor associated with sexual coercion, and gender role stress regarding intellectual inferiority was the only factor associated with injury to partners. No single MGRS factor was uniquely associated with physical aggression. Implications are discussed in terms of the importance of examining specific domains of gender role stress when studying and treating partner violence.

KW - intimate partner violence

KW - masculine gender role stress

KW - violence intervention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651092683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78651092683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/2152-0828.1.S.68

DO - 10.1037/2152-0828.1.S.68

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 68

EP - 75

JO - Psychology of Violence

JF - Psychology of Violence

SN - 2152-0828

IS - SUPPL.

ER -