Dosimetric impact of setup accuracy for an electron breast boost technique

Scott Davidson, Steven Kirsner, Bryan Mason, Kelly Kisling, Renee D. Barrett, Anthony Bonetati, Matthew T. Ballo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the setup error on an electron breast boost technique using daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Patient and setup attributes were studied as contributing factors to the accuracy. Methods and materials: Reproducibility of a modified lateral decubitus position breast boost setup was verified for 33 patients using CBCT. Three-dimensional matching was performed between the CBCT and the initial planning CT for each boost fraction by matching the tumor bed and/or surgical clips. The dosimetric impact of the daily positioning error was achieved by rerunning the initial treatment plans incorporating the recorded shifts to study the dose differences. Breast compression, decubitus angle, tumor bed location and volume, and cup size were studied for their contribution to setup error. Results: The range of setup errors was: 1.5 cm anterior to 9 mm posterior, 1.3 cm superior to 2.3 cm inferior, and 3.2 cm medial to 2.4 cm lateral. Seven patients had setup errors that were ≥ 2-cm margin placed on the tumor bed and scar. Four of those 7 patients had unacceptable coverage as defined by the volume of the tumor bed plus scar that is covered by the 90% isodose line (V90) compared with the original plan. All other patients had no discernible difference in the coverage (V90). The use of compression, tumor bed location, or volumes > 20 mL showed no effect on coverage. Conclusions: In general, this study supported that a 2-cm margin was adequate (29 of 33 patients) when patients are treated under typical conditions. Care should be taken when high electron energies are selected because the coverage at depth is more difficult to maintain in the clinical environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number507
Pages (from-to)e499-e504
JournalPractical Radiation Oncology
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Breast
Electrons
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Cicatrix
Neoplasms
Acoustic Neuroma
Tumor Burden
Surgical Instruments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Davidson, S., Kirsner, S., Mason, B., Kisling, K., Barrett, R. D., Bonetati, A., & Ballo, M. T. (2015). Dosimetric impact of setup accuracy for an electron breast boost technique. Practical Radiation Oncology, 5(5), e499-e504. [507]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2015.02.011

Dosimetric impact of setup accuracy for an electron breast boost technique. / Davidson, Scott; Kirsner, Steven; Mason, Bryan; Kisling, Kelly; Barrett, Renee D.; Bonetati, Anthony; Ballo, Matthew T.

In: Practical Radiation Oncology, Vol. 5, No. 5, 507, 01.09.2015, p. e499-e504.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davidson, S, Kirsner, S, Mason, B, Kisling, K, Barrett, RD, Bonetati, A & Ballo, MT 2015, 'Dosimetric impact of setup accuracy for an electron breast boost technique', Practical Radiation Oncology, vol. 5, no. 5, 507, pp. e499-e504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2015.02.011
Davidson S, Kirsner S, Mason B, Kisling K, Barrett RD, Bonetati A et al. Dosimetric impact of setup accuracy for an electron breast boost technique. Practical Radiation Oncology. 2015 Sep 1;5(5):e499-e504. 507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2015.02.011
Davidson, Scott ; Kirsner, Steven ; Mason, Bryan ; Kisling, Kelly ; Barrett, Renee D. ; Bonetati, Anthony ; Ballo, Matthew T. / Dosimetric impact of setup accuracy for an electron breast boost technique. In: Practical Radiation Oncology. 2015 ; Vol. 5, No. 5. pp. e499-e504.
@article{26e0c56e461b41fbb984546b684bdc47,
title = "Dosimetric impact of setup accuracy for an electron breast boost technique",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine the setup error on an electron breast boost technique using daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Patient and setup attributes were studied as contributing factors to the accuracy. Methods and materials: Reproducibility of a modified lateral decubitus position breast boost setup was verified for 33 patients using CBCT. Three-dimensional matching was performed between the CBCT and the initial planning CT for each boost fraction by matching the tumor bed and/or surgical clips. The dosimetric impact of the daily positioning error was achieved by rerunning the initial treatment plans incorporating the recorded shifts to study the dose differences. Breast compression, decubitus angle, tumor bed location and volume, and cup size were studied for their contribution to setup error. Results: The range of setup errors was: 1.5 cm anterior to 9 mm posterior, 1.3 cm superior to 2.3 cm inferior, and 3.2 cm medial to 2.4 cm lateral. Seven patients had setup errors that were ≥ 2-cm margin placed on the tumor bed and scar. Four of those 7 patients had unacceptable coverage as defined by the volume of the tumor bed plus scar that is covered by the 90{\%} isodose line (V90) compared with the original plan. All other patients had no discernible difference in the coverage (V90). The use of compression, tumor bed location, or volumes > 20 mL showed no effect on coverage. Conclusions: In general, this study supported that a 2-cm margin was adequate (29 of 33 patients) when patients are treated under typical conditions. Care should be taken when high electron energies are selected because the coverage at depth is more difficult to maintain in the clinical environment.",
author = "Scott Davidson and Steven Kirsner and Bryan Mason and Kelly Kisling and Barrett, {Renee D.} and Anthony Bonetati and Ballo, {Matthew T.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.prro.2015.02.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "e499--e504",
journal = "Practical Radiation Oncology",
issn = "1879-8500",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dosimetric impact of setup accuracy for an electron breast boost technique

AU - Davidson, Scott

AU - Kirsner, Steven

AU - Mason, Bryan

AU - Kisling, Kelly

AU - Barrett, Renee D.

AU - Bonetati, Anthony

AU - Ballo, Matthew T.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Purpose: To determine the setup error on an electron breast boost technique using daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Patient and setup attributes were studied as contributing factors to the accuracy. Methods and materials: Reproducibility of a modified lateral decubitus position breast boost setup was verified for 33 patients using CBCT. Three-dimensional matching was performed between the CBCT and the initial planning CT for each boost fraction by matching the tumor bed and/or surgical clips. The dosimetric impact of the daily positioning error was achieved by rerunning the initial treatment plans incorporating the recorded shifts to study the dose differences. Breast compression, decubitus angle, tumor bed location and volume, and cup size were studied for their contribution to setup error. Results: The range of setup errors was: 1.5 cm anterior to 9 mm posterior, 1.3 cm superior to 2.3 cm inferior, and 3.2 cm medial to 2.4 cm lateral. Seven patients had setup errors that were ≥ 2-cm margin placed on the tumor bed and scar. Four of those 7 patients had unacceptable coverage as defined by the volume of the tumor bed plus scar that is covered by the 90% isodose line (V90) compared with the original plan. All other patients had no discernible difference in the coverage (V90). The use of compression, tumor bed location, or volumes > 20 mL showed no effect on coverage. Conclusions: In general, this study supported that a 2-cm margin was adequate (29 of 33 patients) when patients are treated under typical conditions. Care should be taken when high electron energies are selected because the coverage at depth is more difficult to maintain in the clinical environment.

AB - Purpose: To determine the setup error on an electron breast boost technique using daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Patient and setup attributes were studied as contributing factors to the accuracy. Methods and materials: Reproducibility of a modified lateral decubitus position breast boost setup was verified for 33 patients using CBCT. Three-dimensional matching was performed between the CBCT and the initial planning CT for each boost fraction by matching the tumor bed and/or surgical clips. The dosimetric impact of the daily positioning error was achieved by rerunning the initial treatment plans incorporating the recorded shifts to study the dose differences. Breast compression, decubitus angle, tumor bed location and volume, and cup size were studied for their contribution to setup error. Results: The range of setup errors was: 1.5 cm anterior to 9 mm posterior, 1.3 cm superior to 2.3 cm inferior, and 3.2 cm medial to 2.4 cm lateral. Seven patients had setup errors that were ≥ 2-cm margin placed on the tumor bed and scar. Four of those 7 patients had unacceptable coverage as defined by the volume of the tumor bed plus scar that is covered by the 90% isodose line (V90) compared with the original plan. All other patients had no discernible difference in the coverage (V90). The use of compression, tumor bed location, or volumes > 20 mL showed no effect on coverage. Conclusions: In general, this study supported that a 2-cm margin was adequate (29 of 33 patients) when patients are treated under typical conditions. Care should be taken when high electron energies are selected because the coverage at depth is more difficult to maintain in the clinical environment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940961903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940961903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prro.2015.02.011

DO - 10.1016/j.prro.2015.02.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 25858772

AN - SCOPUS:84940961903

VL - 5

SP - e499-e504

JO - Practical Radiation Oncology

JF - Practical Radiation Oncology

SN - 1879-8500

IS - 5

M1 - 507

ER -