Dual effects of ether on end‐plate currents.

P. W. Gage, O. P. Hamill, D. Van Helden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations


1. The effects of diethyl ether (ether) on miniature end‐plate currents (m.e.p.c.s) and on acetylcholine‐activated end‐plate channels were measured in toad sartorius muscle fibres with voltage‐clamp and extracellular recording techniques. 2. At low concentrations (less than 20 mM) either made m.e.p.c.s decay faster than normal. At high concentrations (greaster than 40 mM), the decay of m.e.p.c.s was slower than normal. With all concentrations, the cecay remained exponential with single time constant, tau D. 3. At low concentrations ether did not affect the growth phase of m.e.p.c.s and only slightly reduced the amplitude of m.e.p.c.s. At the higher concentrations, the growth phase was slowed and m.e.p.c.s were significantly reduced in amplitude. 4. Ether at all concentrations (5‐‐70 mM) reduced end‐plate channel lifetime, the effect increasing with ether concentration. Ether did not significantly alter the elementary channel conductance or the actylcholine null (reversal) potential. 5. Curare reduced tau D which had been prolonged by high concentrations of ether. Ether itself at high concentrations caused a reduction in tau D increased by neostigmine. It is proposed that high concentrations of either inhibit acetylcholine hydrolysis by acetylcholinesterase. 6. The effect of ether in reducing end‐plate channel lifetime and reducing m.e.p.c. amplitude, without significantly altering the normal voltage and temperature sensitivity of channel lifetime, is consistent with the proposal that either reduces the stability of open end‐plate channels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)353-369
Number of pages17
JournalThe Journal of Physiology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 1 1979
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology


Dive into the research topics of 'Dual effects of ether on end‐plate currents.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this