Dynamic Cellular Adhesion Mediated by Copolymeric Nanofilm Substrates

Eric Shin, Mark Chen, Shiva Daram, Siby Samuel, Suraj Gupta, Erik Robinson, Erik Pierstorff, Dean Ho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Amphiphilic block copolymers are finding increased potential in biological and medical research due to their innate alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic blocks/segments that can be used to package therapeutics, or coat a broad array of biological interfaces. Some studies are already directed toward using these copolymers' ability to form micelles or vesicles to develop novel methods of drug delivery to prevent inflammation or pro-cancer activity. Our study, however, aims to investigate the more fundamental cell—block copolymer interaction for use in protective nanofilms to prevent biofouling of non-tissue-based implantable devices. Block copolymers could potentially fill the demand for biologically inert, highly functionalizable biomaterials desirable for this type of application. Two such polymers used in our study include polymethyloxazoline—polydimethylsiloxane—polymethyloxazoline (PMOXA—PDMS—PMOXA) triblock copolymer and polyethylene oxide-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO—PMMA) diblock copolymer. Each block copolymer possesses hydrophilic and hydrophobic blocks that enable it to mimic the cell lipid membrane. So far we have shown that triblock copolymer is capable of inhibiting the accumulation of murine macrophages onto glass substrates. Preliminary evidence has suggested that the triblock copolymer has anti-adsorptive and noninflammatory capabilities during short incubation periods (7 days) in vitro. While the diblock copolymer displays minimal anti-adsorptive activities, nanofilms comprising a mixture of the two copolymers were able to significantly reduce macrophage accumulation onto glass substrates. The disparate behavior of macrophages on the different materials may be due to specific inherent properties such as preference for hydrophobic versus hydrophilic surfaces and/or rough versus smooth nanotextures. Furthermore, the specific endgroups of the two polymers may exhibit varying capacities to resisting non-specific protein adsorption. Continued investigation outlining the physical and chemical properties desirable for an anti-adsorptive nanofilm coating will serve as a basis to design durable implant—tissue interfaces that can react to various external stimuli.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)206-214
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Laboratory Automation
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Block copolymers
Adhesion
Macrophages
Glass
Polymers
Substrates
Biofouling
Micelles
Biocompatible Materials
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Membrane Lipids
Adsorption
Copolymers
Biomedical Research
Inflammation
Equipment and Supplies
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Neoplasms
Proteins
Polyethylene oxides

Keywords

  • cellular interrogation
  • drug delivery
  • implant
  • nanomaterials
  • nanomedicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Cite this

Dynamic Cellular Adhesion Mediated by Copolymeric Nanofilm Substrates. / Shin, Eric; Chen, Mark; Daram, Shiva; Samuel, Siby; Gupta, Suraj; Robinson, Erik; Pierstorff, Erik; Ho, Dean.

In: Journal of Laboratory Automation, Vol. 13, No. 4, 01.01.2008, p. 206-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shin, E, Chen, M, Daram, S, Samuel, S, Gupta, S, Robinson, E, Pierstorff, E & Ho, D 2008, 'Dynamic Cellular Adhesion Mediated by Copolymeric Nanofilm Substrates', Journal of Laboratory Automation, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 206-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jala.2008.04.004
Shin, Eric ; Chen, Mark ; Daram, Shiva ; Samuel, Siby ; Gupta, Suraj ; Robinson, Erik ; Pierstorff, Erik ; Ho, Dean. / Dynamic Cellular Adhesion Mediated by Copolymeric Nanofilm Substrates. In: Journal of Laboratory Automation. 2008 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 206-214.
@article{b31bf53a467c4e5fb9d3db16535a3395,
title = "Dynamic Cellular Adhesion Mediated by Copolymeric Nanofilm Substrates",
abstract = "Amphiphilic block copolymers are finding increased potential in biological and medical research due to their innate alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic blocks/segments that can be used to package therapeutics, or coat a broad array of biological interfaces. Some studies are already directed toward using these copolymers' ability to form micelles or vesicles to develop novel methods of drug delivery to prevent inflammation or pro-cancer activity. Our study, however, aims to investigate the more fundamental cell—block copolymer interaction for use in protective nanofilms to prevent biofouling of non-tissue-based implantable devices. Block copolymers could potentially fill the demand for biologically inert, highly functionalizable biomaterials desirable for this type of application. Two such polymers used in our study include polymethyloxazoline—polydimethylsiloxane—polymethyloxazoline (PMOXA—PDMS—PMOXA) triblock copolymer and polyethylene oxide-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO—PMMA) diblock copolymer. Each block copolymer possesses hydrophilic and hydrophobic blocks that enable it to mimic the cell lipid membrane. So far we have shown that triblock copolymer is capable of inhibiting the accumulation of murine macrophages onto glass substrates. Preliminary evidence has suggested that the triblock copolymer has anti-adsorptive and noninflammatory capabilities during short incubation periods (7 days) in vitro. While the diblock copolymer displays minimal anti-adsorptive activities, nanofilms comprising a mixture of the two copolymers were able to significantly reduce macrophage accumulation onto glass substrates. The disparate behavior of macrophages on the different materials may be due to specific inherent properties such as preference for hydrophobic versus hydrophilic surfaces and/or rough versus smooth nanotextures. Furthermore, the specific endgroups of the two polymers may exhibit varying capacities to resisting non-specific protein adsorption. Continued investigation outlining the physical and chemical properties desirable for an anti-adsorptive nanofilm coating will serve as a basis to design durable implant—tissue interfaces that can react to various external stimuli.",
keywords = "cellular interrogation, drug delivery, implant, nanomaterials, nanomedicine",
author = "Eric Shin and Mark Chen and Shiva Daram and Siby Samuel and Suraj Gupta and Erik Robinson and Erik Pierstorff and Dean Ho",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jala.2008.04.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "206--214",
journal = "JALA - Journal of the Association for Laboratory Automation",
issn = "1535-5535",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dynamic Cellular Adhesion Mediated by Copolymeric Nanofilm Substrates

AU - Shin, Eric

AU - Chen, Mark

AU - Daram, Shiva

AU - Samuel, Siby

AU - Gupta, Suraj

AU - Robinson, Erik

AU - Pierstorff, Erik

AU - Ho, Dean

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Amphiphilic block copolymers are finding increased potential in biological and medical research due to their innate alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic blocks/segments that can be used to package therapeutics, or coat a broad array of biological interfaces. Some studies are already directed toward using these copolymers' ability to form micelles or vesicles to develop novel methods of drug delivery to prevent inflammation or pro-cancer activity. Our study, however, aims to investigate the more fundamental cell—block copolymer interaction for use in protective nanofilms to prevent biofouling of non-tissue-based implantable devices. Block copolymers could potentially fill the demand for biologically inert, highly functionalizable biomaterials desirable for this type of application. Two such polymers used in our study include polymethyloxazoline—polydimethylsiloxane—polymethyloxazoline (PMOXA—PDMS—PMOXA) triblock copolymer and polyethylene oxide-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO—PMMA) diblock copolymer. Each block copolymer possesses hydrophilic and hydrophobic blocks that enable it to mimic the cell lipid membrane. So far we have shown that triblock copolymer is capable of inhibiting the accumulation of murine macrophages onto glass substrates. Preliminary evidence has suggested that the triblock copolymer has anti-adsorptive and noninflammatory capabilities during short incubation periods (7 days) in vitro. While the diblock copolymer displays minimal anti-adsorptive activities, nanofilms comprising a mixture of the two copolymers were able to significantly reduce macrophage accumulation onto glass substrates. The disparate behavior of macrophages on the different materials may be due to specific inherent properties such as preference for hydrophobic versus hydrophilic surfaces and/or rough versus smooth nanotextures. Furthermore, the specific endgroups of the two polymers may exhibit varying capacities to resisting non-specific protein adsorption. Continued investigation outlining the physical and chemical properties desirable for an anti-adsorptive nanofilm coating will serve as a basis to design durable implant—tissue interfaces that can react to various external stimuli.

AB - Amphiphilic block copolymers are finding increased potential in biological and medical research due to their innate alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic blocks/segments that can be used to package therapeutics, or coat a broad array of biological interfaces. Some studies are already directed toward using these copolymers' ability to form micelles or vesicles to develop novel methods of drug delivery to prevent inflammation or pro-cancer activity. Our study, however, aims to investigate the more fundamental cell—block copolymer interaction for use in protective nanofilms to prevent biofouling of non-tissue-based implantable devices. Block copolymers could potentially fill the demand for biologically inert, highly functionalizable biomaterials desirable for this type of application. Two such polymers used in our study include polymethyloxazoline—polydimethylsiloxane—polymethyloxazoline (PMOXA—PDMS—PMOXA) triblock copolymer and polyethylene oxide-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO—PMMA) diblock copolymer. Each block copolymer possesses hydrophilic and hydrophobic blocks that enable it to mimic the cell lipid membrane. So far we have shown that triblock copolymer is capable of inhibiting the accumulation of murine macrophages onto glass substrates. Preliminary evidence has suggested that the triblock copolymer has anti-adsorptive and noninflammatory capabilities during short incubation periods (7 days) in vitro. While the diblock copolymer displays minimal anti-adsorptive activities, nanofilms comprising a mixture of the two copolymers were able to significantly reduce macrophage accumulation onto glass substrates. The disparate behavior of macrophages on the different materials may be due to specific inherent properties such as preference for hydrophobic versus hydrophilic surfaces and/or rough versus smooth nanotextures. Furthermore, the specific endgroups of the two polymers may exhibit varying capacities to resisting non-specific protein adsorption. Continued investigation outlining the physical and chemical properties desirable for an anti-adsorptive nanofilm coating will serve as a basis to design durable implant—tissue interfaces that can react to various external stimuli.

KW - cellular interrogation

KW - drug delivery

KW - implant

KW - nanomaterials

KW - nanomedicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46449136726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46449136726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jala.2008.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jala.2008.04.004

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 206

EP - 214

JO - JALA - Journal of the Association for Laboratory Automation

JF - JALA - Journal of the Association for Laboratory Automation

SN - 1535-5535

IS - 4

ER -