TY - JOUR
T1 - Dynamic expression profiles from static cytometry data
T2 - Component fitting and conversion to relative, "same scale" values
AU - Avva, Jayant
AU - Weis, Michael C.
AU - Sramkoski, R. Michael
AU - Sreenath, Sree N.
AU - Jacobberger, James W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Limited skin sensitization data are available for 4-allylphenol (Table 1). The chemical structure of this material indicates that it would be expected to react with skin proteins directly (Roberts et al., 2007; Toxtree v3.1.0). Acting conservatively due to the limited data, the reported exposure was benchmarked utilizing the reactive DST of 64 μg/cm2 (Safford, 2008, 2011, 2015b; Roberts et al., 2015). The current exposure from the 95th percentile concentration is below the DST for reactive materials when evaluated in all QRA categories. Table 2 provides the supported concentrations for 4-allylphenol that present no appreciable risk for skin sensitization based on the reactive DST. These levels represent supported concentrations based on the DST approach. However, additional studies may show it could be used at higher levels.
PY - 2012/7/12
Y1 - 2012/7/12
N2 - Background: Cytometry of asynchronous proliferating cell populations produces data with an extractable time-based feature embedded in the frequency of clustered, correlated events. Here, we present a specific case of general methodology for calculating dynamic expression profiles of epitopes that oscillate during the cell cycle and conversion of these values to the same scale. Methods: Samples of K562 cells from one population were labeled by direct and indirect antibody methods for cyclins A2 and B1 and phospho-S10-histone H3. The same indirect antibody was used for both cyclins. Directly stained samples were counter-stained with 4′6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and indirectly stained samples with propidium to label DNA. The S phase cyclin expressions from indirect assays were used to scale the expression of the cyclins of the multi-variate direct assay. Boolean gating and two dimensional, sequential regions set on bivariate displays of the directly conjugated sample data were used to untangle and isolate unique, unambiguous expression values of the cyclins along the four-dimensional data path through the cell cycle. The median values of cyclins A2 and B1 from each region were correlated with the frequency of events within each region. Results: The sequential runs of data were plotted as continuous multi-line linear equations of the form y = [(yi+1-yi)/(xi+1-xi)]x + yi-[(yi+1-yi)/(xi+1-xi)]xi (line between points (xi,yi) and (xi+1, yi+1)) to capture the dynamic expression profile of the two cyclins. Conclusions: This specific approach demonstrates the general methodology and provides a rule set from which the cell cycle expression of any other epitopes could be measured and calculated. These expression profiles are the "state variable" outputs, useful for calibrating mathematical cell cycle models.
AB - Background: Cytometry of asynchronous proliferating cell populations produces data with an extractable time-based feature embedded in the frequency of clustered, correlated events. Here, we present a specific case of general methodology for calculating dynamic expression profiles of epitopes that oscillate during the cell cycle and conversion of these values to the same scale. Methods: Samples of K562 cells from one population were labeled by direct and indirect antibody methods for cyclins A2 and B1 and phospho-S10-histone H3. The same indirect antibody was used for both cyclins. Directly stained samples were counter-stained with 4′6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and indirectly stained samples with propidium to label DNA. The S phase cyclin expressions from indirect assays were used to scale the expression of the cyclins of the multi-variate direct assay. Boolean gating and two dimensional, sequential regions set on bivariate displays of the directly conjugated sample data were used to untangle and isolate unique, unambiguous expression values of the cyclins along the four-dimensional data path through the cell cycle. The median values of cyclins A2 and B1 from each region were correlated with the frequency of events within each region. Results: The sequential runs of data were plotted as continuous multi-line linear equations of the form y = [(yi+1-yi)/(xi+1-xi)]x + yi-[(yi+1-yi)/(xi+1-xi)]xi (line between points (xi,yi) and (xi+1, yi+1)) to capture the dynamic expression profile of the two cyclins. Conclusions: This specific approach demonstrates the general methodology and provides a rule set from which the cell cycle expression of any other epitopes could be measured and calculated. These expression profiles are the "state variable" outputs, useful for calibrating mathematical cell cycle models.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863764186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863764186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0038275
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0038275
M3 - Article
C2 - 22808005
AN - SCOPUS:84863764186
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 7
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 7
M1 - e38275
ER -