TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of a Remote Facilitator on Small-Group Problem Solving
T2 - Potential Uses of Two-Way Video Technology in Decentralized Medical Education
AU - Crump, William J.
AU - Caskey, Juanita W.
AU - Ferrell, Barbara G.
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - Background: As more of medical education becomes decentralized to off-campus sites, the ability of campus faculty to monitor the development of student problem-solving skills becomes more limited. Purpose: This study addressed the acceptability of providing a remote facilitator by telephone or full-motion interactive video, as well as measuring the effect on group process in each of the three facilitator arrangements. Methods: Three groups of clerkship students were facilitated first on site, then by interactive video, then by telephone only. Results: Both off-site methods proved acceptable, but students felt that they increased their content knowledge more in on-site and video sessions. There were no differences in group interactions. In the on-site and telephone groups, the facilitators tended to be the predominant questioners; in the video group, the students asked more questions of the facilitator. Conclusions: In the sequence used, interactive video technology had the same or more positive effects on measured variables when compared to an on-site facilitator. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 10(3), 172-177
AB - Background: As more of medical education becomes decentralized to off-campus sites, the ability of campus faculty to monitor the development of student problem-solving skills becomes more limited. Purpose: This study addressed the acceptability of providing a remote facilitator by telephone or full-motion interactive video, as well as measuring the effect on group process in each of the three facilitator arrangements. Methods: Three groups of clerkship students were facilitated first on site, then by interactive video, then by telephone only. Results: Both off-site methods proved acceptable, but students felt that they increased their content knowledge more in on-site and video sessions. There were no differences in group interactions. In the on-site and telephone groups, the facilitators tended to be the predominant questioners; in the video group, the students asked more questions of the facilitator. Conclusions: In the sequence used, interactive video technology had the same or more positive effects on measured variables when compared to an on-site facilitator. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 10(3), 172-177
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032341629&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032341629&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1207/S15328015TLM1003_9
DO - 10.1207/S15328015TLM1003_9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0032341629
SN - 1040-1334
VL - 10
SP - 172
EP - 177
JO - Teaching and Learning in Medicine
JF - Teaching and Learning in Medicine
IS - 3
ER -