TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia versus epidural analgesia on labor and delivery duration
AU - Pascual-Ramirez, Javier
AU - Haya, Javier
AU - Pérez-López, Faustino R.
AU - Gil-Trujillo, Silvia
AU - Garrido-Esteban, Rosa A.
AU - Bernal, Ginés
PY - 2011/9
Y1 - 2011/9
N2 - Objective: To determine whether combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSEA) can decrease the known epidural effect of lengthening delivery. Methods: Between April and May 2010, 144 women undergoing childbirth in hospital with epidural pain relief were randomized to receive either low-dose epidural analgesia (LEA) or CSEA. The spinal component included 2.5 mg of bupivacaine, 25 μg of fentanyl, and 200 μg of morphine. The epidural component of the CSEA procedure was started once pain returned. The primary outcome was total labor duration measured from the time of initiation of labor analgesia to delivery. Results: The difference in duration between LEA (n = 72) and CSEA (n = 72) was 5 minutes for labor (P = 0.82), 2 minutes for delivery (P = 0.60), and 7 minutes for total labor duration (P = 0.75). The combined group used less levobupivacaine (P < 0.001) and had lower sensory blockade at the dermatomal level (P = 0.037). Women in the CSEA group had a higher incidence of pruritus (P = 0.002) and lightheadedness (P = 0.02) during labor; and a higher incidence of pruritus (P = 0.002), nausea-vomiting (P = 0.026), and drowsiness (P = 0.003) in the postpartum period. Conclusion: As compared with LEA, CSEA did not shorten the duration of labor length; however, it did reduce levobupivacaine consumption and motor weakness.
AB - Objective: To determine whether combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSEA) can decrease the known epidural effect of lengthening delivery. Methods: Between April and May 2010, 144 women undergoing childbirth in hospital with epidural pain relief were randomized to receive either low-dose epidural analgesia (LEA) or CSEA. The spinal component included 2.5 mg of bupivacaine, 25 μg of fentanyl, and 200 μg of morphine. The epidural component of the CSEA procedure was started once pain returned. The primary outcome was total labor duration measured from the time of initiation of labor analgesia to delivery. Results: The difference in duration between LEA (n = 72) and CSEA (n = 72) was 5 minutes for labor (P = 0.82), 2 minutes for delivery (P = 0.60), and 7 minutes for total labor duration (P = 0.75). The combined group used less levobupivacaine (P < 0.001) and had lower sensory blockade at the dermatomal level (P = 0.037). Women in the CSEA group had a higher incidence of pruritus (P = 0.002) and lightheadedness (P = 0.02) during labor; and a higher incidence of pruritus (P = 0.002), nausea-vomiting (P = 0.026), and drowsiness (P = 0.003) in the postpartum period. Conclusion: As compared with LEA, CSEA did not shorten the duration of labor length; however, it did reduce levobupivacaine consumption and motor weakness.
KW - Combined spinal-epidural analgesia
KW - Labor and delivery duration
KW - Labor epidural analgesia
KW - Morphine spinal analgesia
KW - Randomized trial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961169257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961169257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.04.004
DO - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.04.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 21719012
AN - SCOPUS:79961169257
SN - 0020-7292
VL - 114
SP - 246
EP - 250
JO - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
JF - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
IS - 3
ER -