Effect of Elbow Position on Load to Failure in Olecranon Fracture Fixation

A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study

Robert Lindeman, Randal Morris, Paul Weatherby, Adam Neustein, Nicholas H. Maassen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates if relative flexion or extension of the ulnohumeral joint affects the strength of repair in olecranon fractures treated with a precontoured locking plate. METHODS: A cadaveric study was performed in matched pair cadaveric elbows. All soft tissue was dissected from the radius, ulna, and elbow of each specimen, leaving interosseous ligaments and joint capsules intact. Soft tissue from the humerus was dissected away, leaving only the triceps tendon and ulnar insertions intact. An oblique proximal to distal olecranon osteotomy was created in each specimen 1 cm from the tip of the olecranon. Internal fixation with standard precontoured locking plates and a Krackow augmentation suture with #2 FiberWire followed. Specimens were randomized to elbow position of 90 or 20 degrees° and loaded to failure via axial pull through the triceps. Load at failure, displacement at the time of failure, peak load, stiffness, and mechanism of failure was recorded and compared. The study was repeated a second time with the osteotomy more proximal, 0.6 cm creating a smaller fragment with less opportunities for locking screw fixation. This small fragment group was then tested as the large fragment group had. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in load at failure, peak load, or stiffness between the elbow position in the large fragment group. Displacement at time of failure was significantly different, although not clinically relevant. Failure of fixation in this group was a mix of triceps avulsion and failure through fracture site. The smaller fragment group with less points of fixation demonstrated no statistically significant differences in any parameters. A majority of the failures were at the fracture site. CONCLUSIONS: Ulnohumeral position does not significantly affect overall construct strength even in olecranon fractures with small proximal fragments with limited points of fixation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)256-260
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of orthopaedic trauma
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Olecranon Process
Fracture Fixation
Elbow
Osteotomy
Joint Capsule
Ulna
Humerus
Ligaments
Tendons
Sutures
Joints

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Effect of Elbow Position on Load to Failure in Olecranon Fracture Fixation : A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study. / Lindeman, Robert; Morris, Randal; Weatherby, Paul; Neustein, Adam; Maassen, Nicholas H.

In: Journal of orthopaedic trauma, Vol. 33, No. 5, 01.05.2019, p. 256-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lindeman, Robert ; Morris, Randal ; Weatherby, Paul ; Neustein, Adam ; Maassen, Nicholas H. / Effect of Elbow Position on Load to Failure in Olecranon Fracture Fixation : A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study. In: Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2019 ; Vol. 33, No. 5. pp. 256-260.
@article{0577b55d636c4962ab3bccb19859a29e,
title = "Effect of Elbow Position on Load to Failure in Olecranon Fracture Fixation: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates if relative flexion or extension of the ulnohumeral joint affects the strength of repair in olecranon fractures treated with a precontoured locking plate. METHODS: A cadaveric study was performed in matched pair cadaveric elbows. All soft tissue was dissected from the radius, ulna, and elbow of each specimen, leaving interosseous ligaments and joint capsules intact. Soft tissue from the humerus was dissected away, leaving only the triceps tendon and ulnar insertions intact. An oblique proximal to distal olecranon osteotomy was created in each specimen 1 cm from the tip of the olecranon. Internal fixation with standard precontoured locking plates and a Krackow augmentation suture with #2 FiberWire followed. Specimens were randomized to elbow position of 90 or 20 degrees° and loaded to failure via axial pull through the triceps. Load at failure, displacement at the time of failure, peak load, stiffness, and mechanism of failure was recorded and compared. The study was repeated a second time with the osteotomy more proximal, 0.6 cm creating a smaller fragment with less opportunities for locking screw fixation. This small fragment group was then tested as the large fragment group had. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in load at failure, peak load, or stiffness between the elbow position in the large fragment group. Displacement at time of failure was significantly different, although not clinically relevant. Failure of fixation in this group was a mix of triceps avulsion and failure through fracture site. The smaller fragment group with less points of fixation demonstrated no statistically significant differences in any parameters. A majority of the failures were at the fracture site. CONCLUSIONS: Ulnohumeral position does not significantly affect overall construct strength even in olecranon fractures with small proximal fragments with limited points of fixation.",
author = "Robert Lindeman and Randal Morris and Paul Weatherby and Adam Neustein and Maassen, {Nicholas H.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BOT.0000000000001423",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "256--260",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma",
issn = "0890-5339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Elbow Position on Load to Failure in Olecranon Fracture Fixation

T2 - A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study

AU - Lindeman, Robert

AU - Morris, Randal

AU - Weatherby, Paul

AU - Neustein, Adam

AU - Maassen, Nicholas H.

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates if relative flexion or extension of the ulnohumeral joint affects the strength of repair in olecranon fractures treated with a precontoured locking plate. METHODS: A cadaveric study was performed in matched pair cadaveric elbows. All soft tissue was dissected from the radius, ulna, and elbow of each specimen, leaving interosseous ligaments and joint capsules intact. Soft tissue from the humerus was dissected away, leaving only the triceps tendon and ulnar insertions intact. An oblique proximal to distal olecranon osteotomy was created in each specimen 1 cm from the tip of the olecranon. Internal fixation with standard precontoured locking plates and a Krackow augmentation suture with #2 FiberWire followed. Specimens were randomized to elbow position of 90 or 20 degrees° and loaded to failure via axial pull through the triceps. Load at failure, displacement at the time of failure, peak load, stiffness, and mechanism of failure was recorded and compared. The study was repeated a second time with the osteotomy more proximal, 0.6 cm creating a smaller fragment with less opportunities for locking screw fixation. This small fragment group was then tested as the large fragment group had. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in load at failure, peak load, or stiffness between the elbow position in the large fragment group. Displacement at time of failure was significantly different, although not clinically relevant. Failure of fixation in this group was a mix of triceps avulsion and failure through fracture site. The smaller fragment group with less points of fixation demonstrated no statistically significant differences in any parameters. A majority of the failures were at the fracture site. CONCLUSIONS: Ulnohumeral position does not significantly affect overall construct strength even in olecranon fractures with small proximal fragments with limited points of fixation.

AB - OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates if relative flexion or extension of the ulnohumeral joint affects the strength of repair in olecranon fractures treated with a precontoured locking plate. METHODS: A cadaveric study was performed in matched pair cadaveric elbows. All soft tissue was dissected from the radius, ulna, and elbow of each specimen, leaving interosseous ligaments and joint capsules intact. Soft tissue from the humerus was dissected away, leaving only the triceps tendon and ulnar insertions intact. An oblique proximal to distal olecranon osteotomy was created in each specimen 1 cm from the tip of the olecranon. Internal fixation with standard precontoured locking plates and a Krackow augmentation suture with #2 FiberWire followed. Specimens were randomized to elbow position of 90 or 20 degrees° and loaded to failure via axial pull through the triceps. Load at failure, displacement at the time of failure, peak load, stiffness, and mechanism of failure was recorded and compared. The study was repeated a second time with the osteotomy more proximal, 0.6 cm creating a smaller fragment with less opportunities for locking screw fixation. This small fragment group was then tested as the large fragment group had. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in load at failure, peak load, or stiffness between the elbow position in the large fragment group. Displacement at time of failure was significantly different, although not clinically relevant. Failure of fixation in this group was a mix of triceps avulsion and failure through fracture site. The smaller fragment group with less points of fixation demonstrated no statistically significant differences in any parameters. A majority of the failures were at the fracture site. CONCLUSIONS: Ulnohumeral position does not significantly affect overall construct strength even in olecranon fractures with small proximal fragments with limited points of fixation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065069470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065069470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001423

DO - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001423

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 256

EP - 260

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

SN - 0890-5339

IS - 5

ER -