Effect of epidural analgesia on colorectal anastomotic healing and colonic motility

Margaret Schnitzler, Michael J. Kilbride, Anthony Senagore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives. To examine the effect of epidural local anesthetic and narcotic agents on colonic anastomotic healing. Methods. A prospective randomized study was conducted in a porcine model. Twenty-one pigs undergoing colorectal resection and anastomosis were randomized to receive either bupivacaine (Group 1), morphine (Group 2), or normal saline (Group 3) by intraoperative and postoperative epidural infusion. Colonic blood flow was measured using laser doppler velocimetry and colonic motility assessed with radio- opaque markers and daily x-rays postoperatively. Seven days postoperatively, the anastomoses were resected and analysis of bursting pressure and hydroxyproline content performed. Results. In this porcine model, epidural anesthesia accelerated colonic transit time. Group 1 and 2 animals had significantly faster colonic transit time (3.9 and 4 days, respectively) when compared with Group 3 animals (6 days; p <0.05, chi-square analysis). There was no statistically significant difference in blood flow, bursting pressure, and hydroxyproline content between the three groups, and no anastomotic complications occurred in any animal. Conclusions. These findings suggest in this model that postoperative epidural analgesia is a safe technique after colorectal resection and anastomosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)143-147
Number of pages5
JournalRegional Anesthesia
Volume17
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Epidural Analgesia
Swine
Hydroxyproline
Pressure
Laser-Doppler Flowmetry
Epidural Anesthesia
Bupivacaine
Narcotics
Local Anesthetics
Morphine
Anesthetics
X-Rays
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Anastomotic healing
  • Bupivacaine
  • Epidural analgesia
  • Morphine sulfate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Schnitzler, M., Kilbride, M. J., & Senagore, A. (1992). Effect of epidural analgesia on colorectal anastomotic healing and colonic motility. Regional Anesthesia, 17(3), 143-147.

Effect of epidural analgesia on colorectal anastomotic healing and colonic motility. / Schnitzler, Margaret; Kilbride, Michael J.; Senagore, Anthony.

In: Regional Anesthesia, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1992, p. 143-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schnitzler, M, Kilbride, MJ & Senagore, A 1992, 'Effect of epidural analgesia on colorectal anastomotic healing and colonic motility', Regional Anesthesia, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 143-147.
Schnitzler, Margaret ; Kilbride, Michael J. ; Senagore, Anthony. / Effect of epidural analgesia on colorectal anastomotic healing and colonic motility. In: Regional Anesthesia. 1992 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 143-147.
@article{d9f16332bba74ddd9fa8d72b1d691bcd,
title = "Effect of epidural analgesia on colorectal anastomotic healing and colonic motility",
abstract = "Background and Objectives. To examine the effect of epidural local anesthetic and narcotic agents on colonic anastomotic healing. Methods. A prospective randomized study was conducted in a porcine model. Twenty-one pigs undergoing colorectal resection and anastomosis were randomized to receive either bupivacaine (Group 1), morphine (Group 2), or normal saline (Group 3) by intraoperative and postoperative epidural infusion. Colonic blood flow was measured using laser doppler velocimetry and colonic motility assessed with radio- opaque markers and daily x-rays postoperatively. Seven days postoperatively, the anastomoses were resected and analysis of bursting pressure and hydroxyproline content performed. Results. In this porcine model, epidural anesthesia accelerated colonic transit time. Group 1 and 2 animals had significantly faster colonic transit time (3.9 and 4 days, respectively) when compared with Group 3 animals (6 days; p <0.05, chi-square analysis). There was no statistically significant difference in blood flow, bursting pressure, and hydroxyproline content between the three groups, and no anastomotic complications occurred in any animal. Conclusions. These findings suggest in this model that postoperative epidural analgesia is a safe technique after colorectal resection and anastomosis.",
keywords = "Anastomotic healing, Bupivacaine, Epidural analgesia, Morphine sulfate",
author = "Margaret Schnitzler and Kilbride, {Michael J.} and Anthony Senagore",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "143--147",
journal = "Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine",
issn = "0146-521X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of epidural analgesia on colorectal anastomotic healing and colonic motility

AU - Schnitzler, Margaret

AU - Kilbride, Michael J.

AU - Senagore, Anthony

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Background and Objectives. To examine the effect of epidural local anesthetic and narcotic agents on colonic anastomotic healing. Methods. A prospective randomized study was conducted in a porcine model. Twenty-one pigs undergoing colorectal resection and anastomosis were randomized to receive either bupivacaine (Group 1), morphine (Group 2), or normal saline (Group 3) by intraoperative and postoperative epidural infusion. Colonic blood flow was measured using laser doppler velocimetry and colonic motility assessed with radio- opaque markers and daily x-rays postoperatively. Seven days postoperatively, the anastomoses were resected and analysis of bursting pressure and hydroxyproline content performed. Results. In this porcine model, epidural anesthesia accelerated colonic transit time. Group 1 and 2 animals had significantly faster colonic transit time (3.9 and 4 days, respectively) when compared with Group 3 animals (6 days; p <0.05, chi-square analysis). There was no statistically significant difference in blood flow, bursting pressure, and hydroxyproline content between the three groups, and no anastomotic complications occurred in any animal. Conclusions. These findings suggest in this model that postoperative epidural analgesia is a safe technique after colorectal resection and anastomosis.

AB - Background and Objectives. To examine the effect of epidural local anesthetic and narcotic agents on colonic anastomotic healing. Methods. A prospective randomized study was conducted in a porcine model. Twenty-one pigs undergoing colorectal resection and anastomosis were randomized to receive either bupivacaine (Group 1), morphine (Group 2), or normal saline (Group 3) by intraoperative and postoperative epidural infusion. Colonic blood flow was measured using laser doppler velocimetry and colonic motility assessed with radio- opaque markers and daily x-rays postoperatively. Seven days postoperatively, the anastomoses were resected and analysis of bursting pressure and hydroxyproline content performed. Results. In this porcine model, epidural anesthesia accelerated colonic transit time. Group 1 and 2 animals had significantly faster colonic transit time (3.9 and 4 days, respectively) when compared with Group 3 animals (6 days; p <0.05, chi-square analysis). There was no statistically significant difference in blood flow, bursting pressure, and hydroxyproline content between the three groups, and no anastomotic complications occurred in any animal. Conclusions. These findings suggest in this model that postoperative epidural analgesia is a safe technique after colorectal resection and anastomosis.

KW - Anastomotic healing

KW - Bupivacaine

KW - Epidural analgesia

KW - Morphine sulfate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026717574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026717574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1606096

AN - SCOPUS:0026717574

VL - 17

SP - 143

EP - 147

JO - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

JF - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

SN - 0146-521X

IS - 3

ER -