TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of exogenous growth hormone and exercise on lean mass and muscle function in children with burns
AU - Suman, Oscar E.
AU - Thomas, Steve J.
AU - Wilkins, Judy P.
AU - Mlcak, Ronald P.
AU - Herndon, David N.
PY - 2003/6/1
Y1 - 2003/6/1
N2 - We tested the hypothesis that the administration of recombinant human growth hormone (rHGH) and exercise would increase lean body mass (LBM) and muscle strength in burned children to a greater extent than rHGH or exercise separately. Children, ages 7-17 yr, with >40% body surface area burned, were randomized into groups. One group (GHEX, n = 10) participated in a 12-wk in-hospital physical rehabilitation program supplemented with an exercise program and received 0.05 mg·kg-1·day-1 of rHGH. A second exercising group (SALEX, n = 13) received saline. A third group (GH, n = 10) received a similar dose of rHGH as GHEX and participated in a 12-wk, home-based physical rehabilitation program without exercise. The fourth group (Saline, n = 11) received saline and participated in a 12-wk, home-based physical rehabilitation program without exercise. The mean (±SE) percent change in lean body mass after 12 wk was not significantly different between GHEX (9.0 ± 2.1%), SALEX (5.4 ± 1.6%), and GH (5.8 ± 1.8%) groups (P = 0.33). However, the mean percent change in muscle strength was significantly greater in the GHEX (36.2 ± 5.4%) and SALEX (42.6 ± 10.0%) groups than in the GH (-7.4 ± 4.7%) or Saline (6.7 ± 4.4%) groups (P = 0.008). In summary, rHGH GHEX, SALEX, and GH alone produced similar improvements in LBM. However, muscle strength was only increased via exercise.
AB - We tested the hypothesis that the administration of recombinant human growth hormone (rHGH) and exercise would increase lean body mass (LBM) and muscle strength in burned children to a greater extent than rHGH or exercise separately. Children, ages 7-17 yr, with >40% body surface area burned, were randomized into groups. One group (GHEX, n = 10) participated in a 12-wk in-hospital physical rehabilitation program supplemented with an exercise program and received 0.05 mg·kg-1·day-1 of rHGH. A second exercising group (SALEX, n = 13) received saline. A third group (GH, n = 10) received a similar dose of rHGH as GHEX and participated in a 12-wk, home-based physical rehabilitation program without exercise. The fourth group (Saline, n = 11) received saline and participated in a 12-wk, home-based physical rehabilitation program without exercise. The mean (±SE) percent change in lean body mass after 12 wk was not significantly different between GHEX (9.0 ± 2.1%), SALEX (5.4 ± 1.6%), and GH (5.8 ± 1.8%) groups (P = 0.33). However, the mean percent change in muscle strength was significantly greater in the GHEX (36.2 ± 5.4%) and SALEX (42.6 ± 10.0%) groups than in the GH (-7.4 ± 4.7%) or Saline (6.7 ± 4.4%) groups (P = 0.008). In summary, rHGH GHEX, SALEX, and GH alone produced similar improvements in LBM. However, muscle strength was only increased via exercise.
KW - Burned children
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Thermal injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038517001&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038517001&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00849.2002
DO - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00849.2002
M3 - Article
C2 - 12588788
AN - SCOPUS:0038517001
SN - 8750-7587
VL - 94
SP - 2273
EP - 2281
JO - Journal of Applied Physiology
JF - Journal of Applied Physiology
IS - 6
ER -