Effect of operator and optical defocus on the variability of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection (PERGLA)

Gianmarco Vizzeri, Ali Tafreshi, Robert N. Weinreb, Christopher Bowd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of operator and optical defocus on the variability of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection (PERGLA). METHODS: Two different operators obtained 2 PERGLA recordings each from 10 healthy participants (5 women, mean age 32.1±10.3 y). In addition, one of the operators obtained recordings in which corrective lenses of various diopters (±0.5, ±1, ±2, and ±3) were used to generate optical defocus in both eyes. The effect of operator on PERGLA amplitude and phase variability was determined using a single nested variance components' analysis model and by using Bland-Altman plots. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the effect of optical defocus on amplitude and phase. RESULTS: Differences in measurements between operators accounted for approximately 26.6% and 18.2% of the total variance for amplitude and phase, respectively. Results were confirmed by the use of Bland-Altman plots. ANOVA identified a significant effect of defocus on mean amplitude (F=2.65, P=0.01), but not phase (F=1.02, P=0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements obtained by different operators can result in significant differences in PERGLA amplitude. In addition, although optical defocus leads to a decrease in PERGLA amplitude by reducing visual acuity, this can be avoided by obtaining J1 or better vision before testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)77-82
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Glaucoma
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Glaucoma
Analysis of Variance
Lenses
Visual Acuity
Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

  • Electrophysiology
  • Glaucoma
  • Pattern electroretinogram
  • PERG
  • Refraction
  • Repeatability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Effect of operator and optical defocus on the variability of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection (PERGLA). / Vizzeri, Gianmarco; Tafreshi, Ali; Weinreb, Robert N.; Bowd, Christopher.

In: Journal of Glaucoma, Vol. 19, No. 2, 02.2010, p. 77-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ad841c40d77640a0aa4ed53c4277ed5d,
title = "Effect of operator and optical defocus on the variability of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection (PERGLA)",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of operator and optical defocus on the variability of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection (PERGLA). METHODS: Two different operators obtained 2 PERGLA recordings each from 10 healthy participants (5 women, mean age 32.1±10.3 y). In addition, one of the operators obtained recordings in which corrective lenses of various diopters (±0.5, ±1, ±2, and ±3) were used to generate optical defocus in both eyes. The effect of operator on PERGLA amplitude and phase variability was determined using a single nested variance components' analysis model and by using Bland-Altman plots. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the effect of optical defocus on amplitude and phase. RESULTS: Differences in measurements between operators accounted for approximately 26.6{\%} and 18.2{\%} of the total variance for amplitude and phase, respectively. Results were confirmed by the use of Bland-Altman plots. ANOVA identified a significant effect of defocus on mean amplitude (F=2.65, P=0.01), but not phase (F=1.02, P=0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements obtained by different operators can result in significant differences in PERGLA amplitude. In addition, although optical defocus leads to a decrease in PERGLA amplitude by reducing visual acuity, this can be avoided by obtaining J1 or better vision before testing.",
keywords = "Electrophysiology, Glaucoma, Pattern electroretinogram, PERG, Refraction, Repeatability",
author = "Gianmarco Vizzeri and Ali Tafreshi and Weinreb, {Robert N.} and Christopher Bowd",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/IJG.0b013e31819f934e",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "77--82",
journal = "Journal of Glaucoma",
issn = "1057-0829",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of operator and optical defocus on the variability of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection (PERGLA)

AU - Vizzeri, Gianmarco

AU - Tafreshi, Ali

AU - Weinreb, Robert N.

AU - Bowd, Christopher

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of operator and optical defocus on the variability of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection (PERGLA). METHODS: Two different operators obtained 2 PERGLA recordings each from 10 healthy participants (5 women, mean age 32.1±10.3 y). In addition, one of the operators obtained recordings in which corrective lenses of various diopters (±0.5, ±1, ±2, and ±3) were used to generate optical defocus in both eyes. The effect of operator on PERGLA amplitude and phase variability was determined using a single nested variance components' analysis model and by using Bland-Altman plots. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the effect of optical defocus on amplitude and phase. RESULTS: Differences in measurements between operators accounted for approximately 26.6% and 18.2% of the total variance for amplitude and phase, respectively. Results were confirmed by the use of Bland-Altman plots. ANOVA identified a significant effect of defocus on mean amplitude (F=2.65, P=0.01), but not phase (F=1.02, P=0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements obtained by different operators can result in significant differences in PERGLA amplitude. In addition, although optical defocus leads to a decrease in PERGLA amplitude by reducing visual acuity, this can be avoided by obtaining J1 or better vision before testing.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of operator and optical defocus on the variability of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection (PERGLA). METHODS: Two different operators obtained 2 PERGLA recordings each from 10 healthy participants (5 women, mean age 32.1±10.3 y). In addition, one of the operators obtained recordings in which corrective lenses of various diopters (±0.5, ±1, ±2, and ±3) were used to generate optical defocus in both eyes. The effect of operator on PERGLA amplitude and phase variability was determined using a single nested variance components' analysis model and by using Bland-Altman plots. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the effect of optical defocus on amplitude and phase. RESULTS: Differences in measurements between operators accounted for approximately 26.6% and 18.2% of the total variance for amplitude and phase, respectively. Results were confirmed by the use of Bland-Altman plots. ANOVA identified a significant effect of defocus on mean amplitude (F=2.65, P=0.01), but not phase (F=1.02, P=0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements obtained by different operators can result in significant differences in PERGLA amplitude. In addition, although optical defocus leads to a decrease in PERGLA amplitude by reducing visual acuity, this can be avoided by obtaining J1 or better vision before testing.

KW - Electrophysiology

KW - Glaucoma

KW - Pattern electroretinogram

KW - PERG

KW - Refraction

KW - Repeatability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77149129538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77149129538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31819f934e

DO - 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31819f934e

M3 - Article

C2 - 19373105

AN - SCOPUS:77149129538

VL - 19

SP - 77

EP - 82

JO - Journal of Glaucoma

JF - Journal of Glaucoma

SN - 1057-0829

IS - 2

ER -