TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of retail clinic use on continuity of care among Medicare beneficiaries
AU - Ogechi Abara, N.
AU - Huang, Nicole
AU - Raji, Mukaila A.
AU - Kuo, Yong Fang
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This work was supported by Grants R01-HS020642 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, P30-AG024832 from the National Institute on Aging, and UL1-TR001439 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of study; the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. Conflict of interest: none declared.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Board of Family Medicine. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Purpose: We examined the relationship between retail clinic use and primary care physician (PCP) continuity among Medicare enrollees in the Houston metropolitan area. Methods: We identified retail clinic providers in the study area using a 2015 health care provider database. Medicare claims data from enrollees who received care from retail clinics in 2015 were compared with propensity score-matched sample of enrollees who received no care from retail clinics. Results: There were 2.32 retail clinic visits per 1000 beneficiaries in a month. Approximately 1.3% of Medicare beneficiaries used retail clinics. Retail clinic users were more likely to be aged 65 to 74 years, female, White, and Medicaid ineligible. In multivariable analyses with adjustments for covariates, significant predictors of retail clinic use included having >3 chronic conditions (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.53 vs no condition), living within 1 mile of a retail clinic (OR, 2.44 vs living >5 miles), and having no PCP (OR, 1.11 vs having PCP). Compared with propensity-matched controls, among enrollees with an identified PCP, likelihood of seeing their PCP (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.93) and continuity of care was lower (0.75 ± 0.33 vs 0.80 ± 0.31) if they had retail clinic visits. Conclusions: Retail clinic use was lower in the elderly population compared with the previously published rate in the younger populations. The lower rate of continuity of care observed among retail clinic users is concerning, especially for those with chronic medical conditions.
AB - Purpose: We examined the relationship between retail clinic use and primary care physician (PCP) continuity among Medicare enrollees in the Houston metropolitan area. Methods: We identified retail clinic providers in the study area using a 2015 health care provider database. Medicare claims data from enrollees who received care from retail clinics in 2015 were compared with propensity score-matched sample of enrollees who received no care from retail clinics. Results: There were 2.32 retail clinic visits per 1000 beneficiaries in a month. Approximately 1.3% of Medicare beneficiaries used retail clinics. Retail clinic users were more likely to be aged 65 to 74 years, female, White, and Medicaid ineligible. In multivariable analyses with adjustments for covariates, significant predictors of retail clinic use included having >3 chronic conditions (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.53 vs no condition), living within 1 mile of a retail clinic (OR, 2.44 vs living >5 miles), and having no PCP (OR, 1.11 vs having PCP). Compared with propensity-matched controls, among enrollees with an identified PCP, likelihood of seeing their PCP (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.93) and continuity of care was lower (0.75 ± 0.33 vs 0.80 ± 0.31) if they had retail clinic visits. Conclusions: Retail clinic use was lower in the elderly population compared with the previously published rate in the younger populations. The lower rate of continuity of care observed among retail clinic users is concerning, especially for those with chronic medical conditions.
KW - Ambulatory Care
KW - Chronic Disease
KW - Continuity of Patient Care
KW - Medicare
KW - Nurse Practitioner
KW - Patient-Centered Care
KW - Primary Care Physicians
KW - Primary Health Care
KW - Retail Clinic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069812102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069812102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180349
DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180349
M3 - Article
C2 - 31300573
AN - SCOPUS:85069812102
SN - 1557-2625
VL - 32
SP - 531
EP - 538
JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
IS - 4
ER -