Effect of Retail Clinic Use on Continuity of Care Among Medicare Beneficiaries

N. Ogechi Abara, Nicole Huang, Mukaila Raji, Yong Fang Kuo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the relationship between retail clinic use and primary care physician (PCP) continuity among Medicare enrollees in the Houston metropolitan area. METHODS: We identified retail clinic providers in the study area using a 2015 health care provider database. Medicare claims data from enrollees who received care from retail clinics in 2015 were compared with propensity score-matched sample of enrollees who received no care from retail clinics. RESULTS: There were 2.32 retail clinic visits per 1000 beneficiaries in a month. Approximately 1.3% of Medicare beneficiaries used retail clinics. Retail clinic users were more likely to be aged 65 to 74 years, female, White, and Medicaid ineligible. In multivariable analyses with adjustments for covariates, significant predictors of retail clinic use included having ≥3 chronic conditions (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.53 vs no condition), living within 1 mile of a retail clinic (OR, 2.44 vs living ≥5 miles), and having no PCP (OR, 1.11 vs having PCP). Compared with propensity-matched controls, among enrollees with an identified PCP, likelihood of seeing their PCP (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.93) and continuity of care was lower (0.75 ± 0.33 vs 0.80 ± 0.31) if they had retail clinic visits. CONCLUSIONS: Retail clinic use was lower in the elderly population compared with the previously published rate in the younger populations. The lower rate of continuity of care observed among retail clinic users is concerning, especially for those with chronic medical conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-538
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Continuity of Patient Care
Primary Care Physicians
Medicare
Odds Ratio
Ambulatory Care
Propensity Score
Social Conditions
Medicaid
Health Personnel
Population
Databases

Keywords

  • Ambulatory Care
  • Chronic Disease
  • Continuity of Patient Care
  • Medicare
  • Nurse Practitioner
  • Patient-Centered Care
  • Primary Care Physicians
  • Primary Health Care
  • Retail Clinic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Effect of Retail Clinic Use on Continuity of Care Among Medicare Beneficiaries. / Abara, N. Ogechi; Huang, Nicole; Raji, Mukaila; Kuo, Yong Fang.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, Vol. 32, No. 4, 01.07.2019, p. 531-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3c76db6845954842a80f9e6f6ff6333f,
title = "Effect of Retail Clinic Use on Continuity of Care Among Medicare Beneficiaries",
abstract = "PURPOSE: We examined the relationship between retail clinic use and primary care physician (PCP) continuity among Medicare enrollees in the Houston metropolitan area. METHODS: We identified retail clinic providers in the study area using a 2015 health care provider database. Medicare claims data from enrollees who received care from retail clinics in 2015 were compared with propensity score-matched sample of enrollees who received no care from retail clinics. RESULTS: There were 2.32 retail clinic visits per 1000 beneficiaries in a month. Approximately 1.3{\%} of Medicare beneficiaries used retail clinics. Retail clinic users were more likely to be aged 65 to 74 years, female, White, and Medicaid ineligible. In multivariable analyses with adjustments for covariates, significant predictors of retail clinic use included having ≥3 chronic conditions (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.53 vs no condition), living within 1 mile of a retail clinic (OR, 2.44 vs living ≥5 miles), and having no PCP (OR, 1.11 vs having PCP). Compared with propensity-matched controls, among enrollees with an identified PCP, likelihood of seeing their PCP (OR, 0.82; 95{\%} CI, 0.73 to 0.93) and continuity of care was lower (0.75 ± 0.33 vs 0.80 ± 0.31) if they had retail clinic visits. CONCLUSIONS: Retail clinic use was lower in the elderly population compared with the previously published rate in the younger populations. The lower rate of continuity of care observed among retail clinic users is concerning, especially for those with chronic medical conditions.",
keywords = "Ambulatory Care, Chronic Disease, Continuity of Patient Care, Medicare, Nurse Practitioner, Patient-Centered Care, Primary Care Physicians, Primary Health Care, Retail Clinic",
author = "Abara, {N. Ogechi} and Nicole Huang and Mukaila Raji and Kuo, {Yong Fang}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180349",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "531--538",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Retail Clinic Use on Continuity of Care Among Medicare Beneficiaries

AU - Abara, N. Ogechi

AU - Huang, Nicole

AU - Raji, Mukaila

AU - Kuo, Yong Fang

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - PURPOSE: We examined the relationship between retail clinic use and primary care physician (PCP) continuity among Medicare enrollees in the Houston metropolitan area. METHODS: We identified retail clinic providers in the study area using a 2015 health care provider database. Medicare claims data from enrollees who received care from retail clinics in 2015 were compared with propensity score-matched sample of enrollees who received no care from retail clinics. RESULTS: There were 2.32 retail clinic visits per 1000 beneficiaries in a month. Approximately 1.3% of Medicare beneficiaries used retail clinics. Retail clinic users were more likely to be aged 65 to 74 years, female, White, and Medicaid ineligible. In multivariable analyses with adjustments for covariates, significant predictors of retail clinic use included having ≥3 chronic conditions (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.53 vs no condition), living within 1 mile of a retail clinic (OR, 2.44 vs living ≥5 miles), and having no PCP (OR, 1.11 vs having PCP). Compared with propensity-matched controls, among enrollees with an identified PCP, likelihood of seeing their PCP (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.93) and continuity of care was lower (0.75 ± 0.33 vs 0.80 ± 0.31) if they had retail clinic visits. CONCLUSIONS: Retail clinic use was lower in the elderly population compared with the previously published rate in the younger populations. The lower rate of continuity of care observed among retail clinic users is concerning, especially for those with chronic medical conditions.

AB - PURPOSE: We examined the relationship between retail clinic use and primary care physician (PCP) continuity among Medicare enrollees in the Houston metropolitan area. METHODS: We identified retail clinic providers in the study area using a 2015 health care provider database. Medicare claims data from enrollees who received care from retail clinics in 2015 were compared with propensity score-matched sample of enrollees who received no care from retail clinics. RESULTS: There were 2.32 retail clinic visits per 1000 beneficiaries in a month. Approximately 1.3% of Medicare beneficiaries used retail clinics. Retail clinic users were more likely to be aged 65 to 74 years, female, White, and Medicaid ineligible. In multivariable analyses with adjustments for covariates, significant predictors of retail clinic use included having ≥3 chronic conditions (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.53 vs no condition), living within 1 mile of a retail clinic (OR, 2.44 vs living ≥5 miles), and having no PCP (OR, 1.11 vs having PCP). Compared with propensity-matched controls, among enrollees with an identified PCP, likelihood of seeing their PCP (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.93) and continuity of care was lower (0.75 ± 0.33 vs 0.80 ± 0.31) if they had retail clinic visits. CONCLUSIONS: Retail clinic use was lower in the elderly population compared with the previously published rate in the younger populations. The lower rate of continuity of care observed among retail clinic users is concerning, especially for those with chronic medical conditions.

KW - Ambulatory Care

KW - Chronic Disease

KW - Continuity of Patient Care

KW - Medicare

KW - Nurse Practitioner

KW - Patient-Centered Care

KW - Primary Care Physicians

KW - Primary Health Care

KW - Retail Clinic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069812102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069812102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180349

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180349

M3 - Article

C2 - 31300573

AN - SCOPUS:85069812102

VL - 32

SP - 531

EP - 538

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 4

ER -