Effect of the STRIDE fall injury prevention intervention on falls, fall injuries, and health-related quality of life

  • David A. Ganz
  • , Anita H. Yuan
  • , Erich J. Greene
  • , Nancy K. Latham
  • , Katy Araujo
  • , Albert L. Siu
  • , Jay Magaziner
  • , Jerry H. Gurwitz
  • , Albert W. Wu
  • , Neil B. Alexander
  • , Robert B. Wallace
  • , Susan L. Greenspan
  • , Jeremy Rich
  • , Elena Volpi
  • , Stephen C. Waring
  • , Patricia C. Dykes
  • , Fred Ko
  • , Neil M. Resnick
  • , Siobhan K. McMahon
  • , Shehzad Basaria
  • Rixin Wang, Charles Lu, Denise Esserman, James Dziura, Michael E. Miller, Thomas G. Travison, Peter Peduzzi, Shalender Bhasin, David B. Reuben, Thomas M. Gill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Falls are common in older adults and can lead to severe injuries. The Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders (STRIDE) trial cluster-randomized 86 primary care practices across 10 health systems to a multifactorial intervention to prevent fall injuries, delivered by registered nurses trained as falls care managers, or enhanced usual care. STRIDE enrolled 5451 community-dwelling older adults age ≥70 at increased fall injury risk. Methods: We assessed fall-related outcomes via telephone interviews of participants (or proxies) every 4 months. At baseline, 12 and 24 months, we assessed health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS. We used Poisson models to assess intervention effects on falls, fall-related fractures, fall injuries leading to hospital admission, and fall injuries leading to medical attention. We used hierarchical longitudinal linear models to assess HRQOL. Results: For recurrent event models, intervention versus control incidence rate ratios were 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93–1.00; p = 0.048) for falls, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.80–1.08; p = 0.337) for self-reported fractures, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.73–1.07; p = 0.205) for adjudicated fractures, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.77–1.07; p = 0.263) for falls leading to hospital admission, and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.89–1.06; p = 0.477) for falls leading to medical attention. Similar effect sizes (non-significant) were obtained for dichotomous outcomes (e.g., participants with ≥1 events). The difference in least square mean change over time in EQ-5D-5L (intervention minus control) was 0.009 (95% CI, −0.002 to 0.019; p = 0.106) at 12 months and 0.005 (95% CI, −0.006 to 0.015; p = 0.384) at 24 months. Conclusions: Across a standard set of outcomes typically reported in fall prevention studies, we observed modest improvements, one of which was statistically significant. Future work should focus on patient-, practice-, and organization-level operational strategies to increase the real-world effectiveness of interventions, and improving the ability to detect small but potentially meaningful clinical effects. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02475850.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3221-3229
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume70
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2022

Keywords

  • care management
  • falls
  • health-related quality of life
  • older persons
  • pragmatic trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of the STRIDE fall injury prevention intervention on falls, fall injuries, and health-related quality of life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this