Effectiveness of colonic fluid resuscitation in a burn-injured swine

Nicole Ribeiro Marques, Robert D. Baker, Michael Kinsky, Jong Lee, Daniel Jupiter, Charles Mitchell, David Herndon, George Kramer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To determine the effectiveness of colonic fluid absorption as a route for fluid resuscitation of a major burn. In order to assess the feasibility and performance of colonic resuscitation, the authors compared plasma volume expansion and hemodynamic parameters of animals submitted to colonic or intravenous fluid resuscitation. Twelve anesthetized swine were submitted to a 40% full thickness flame burn. Thirty minutes later fluid resuscitation was initiated with either intravenous or colonic infusion of crystalloid based on the Parkland formula. This treatment lasted 4.5 hours. The volume of fluid infused was 86 ± 18 ml/kg for the intravenous treatment and 89 ± 14 ml/kg for the colonic treatment. The percentage of fluid absorbed by the colon at the end of the protocol was 30 ± 13% of the infused fluid. Enteral resuscitation was equally effective in expanding plasma volume at the end of the protocol. Laboratorial and hemodynamic parameters were similar between the two resuscitation strategies throughout the study. Urine output was significantly higher in the intravenous group (7.9 ± 4.2 ml/kg/hr vs 0.9 ± 0.3 ml/kg/hr, P = .03). This study demonstrates that colonic infusion of normal saline in a severe burn injury model can restore hemodynamic stability and expand plasma volume to a degree that rivals the effect of direct intravenous infusion for early burn resuscitation in a swine model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)744-750
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Burn Care and Research
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Burns
Resuscitation
Swine
Plasma Volume
Hemodynamics
Intravenous Infusions
Small Intestine
Colon
Therapeutics
Urine
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Effectiveness of colonic fluid resuscitation in a burn-injured swine. / Marques, Nicole Ribeiro; Baker, Robert D.; Kinsky, Michael; Lee, Jong; Jupiter, Daniel; Mitchell, Charles; Herndon, David; Kramer, George.

In: Journal of Burn Care and Research, Vol. 39, No. 5, 01.01.2018, p. 744-750.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marques, Nicole Ribeiro ; Baker, Robert D. ; Kinsky, Michael ; Lee, Jong ; Jupiter, Daniel ; Mitchell, Charles ; Herndon, David ; Kramer, George. / Effectiveness of colonic fluid resuscitation in a burn-injured swine. In: Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2018 ; Vol. 39, No. 5. pp. 744-750.
@article{6bf61028a8144936af83fb886fa9d23a,
title = "Effectiveness of colonic fluid resuscitation in a burn-injured swine",
abstract = "To determine the effectiveness of colonic fluid absorption as a route for fluid resuscitation of a major burn. In order to assess the feasibility and performance of colonic resuscitation, the authors compared plasma volume expansion and hemodynamic parameters of animals submitted to colonic or intravenous fluid resuscitation. Twelve anesthetized swine were submitted to a 40{\%} full thickness flame burn. Thirty minutes later fluid resuscitation was initiated with either intravenous or colonic infusion of crystalloid based on the Parkland formula. This treatment lasted 4.5 hours. The volume of fluid infused was 86 ± 18 ml/kg for the intravenous treatment and 89 ± 14 ml/kg for the colonic treatment. The percentage of fluid absorbed by the colon at the end of the protocol was 30 ± 13{\%} of the infused fluid. Enteral resuscitation was equally effective in expanding plasma volume at the end of the protocol. Laboratorial and hemodynamic parameters were similar between the two resuscitation strategies throughout the study. Urine output was significantly higher in the intravenous group (7.9 ± 4.2 ml/kg/hr vs 0.9 ± 0.3 ml/kg/hr, P = .03). This study demonstrates that colonic infusion of normal saline in a severe burn injury model can restore hemodynamic stability and expand plasma volume to a degree that rivals the effect of direct intravenous infusion for early burn resuscitation in a swine model.",
author = "Marques, {Nicole Ribeiro} and Baker, {Robert D.} and Michael Kinsky and Jong Lee and Daniel Jupiter and Charles Mitchell and David Herndon and George Kramer",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jbcr/irx035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "744--750",
journal = "Journal of Burn Care and Research",
issn = "1559-047X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of colonic fluid resuscitation in a burn-injured swine

AU - Marques, Nicole Ribeiro

AU - Baker, Robert D.

AU - Kinsky, Michael

AU - Lee, Jong

AU - Jupiter, Daniel

AU - Mitchell, Charles

AU - Herndon, David

AU - Kramer, George

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - To determine the effectiveness of colonic fluid absorption as a route for fluid resuscitation of a major burn. In order to assess the feasibility and performance of colonic resuscitation, the authors compared plasma volume expansion and hemodynamic parameters of animals submitted to colonic or intravenous fluid resuscitation. Twelve anesthetized swine were submitted to a 40% full thickness flame burn. Thirty minutes later fluid resuscitation was initiated with either intravenous or colonic infusion of crystalloid based on the Parkland formula. This treatment lasted 4.5 hours. The volume of fluid infused was 86 ± 18 ml/kg for the intravenous treatment and 89 ± 14 ml/kg for the colonic treatment. The percentage of fluid absorbed by the colon at the end of the protocol was 30 ± 13% of the infused fluid. Enteral resuscitation was equally effective in expanding plasma volume at the end of the protocol. Laboratorial and hemodynamic parameters were similar between the two resuscitation strategies throughout the study. Urine output was significantly higher in the intravenous group (7.9 ± 4.2 ml/kg/hr vs 0.9 ± 0.3 ml/kg/hr, P = .03). This study demonstrates that colonic infusion of normal saline in a severe burn injury model can restore hemodynamic stability and expand plasma volume to a degree that rivals the effect of direct intravenous infusion for early burn resuscitation in a swine model.

AB - To determine the effectiveness of colonic fluid absorption as a route for fluid resuscitation of a major burn. In order to assess the feasibility and performance of colonic resuscitation, the authors compared plasma volume expansion and hemodynamic parameters of animals submitted to colonic or intravenous fluid resuscitation. Twelve anesthetized swine were submitted to a 40% full thickness flame burn. Thirty minutes later fluid resuscitation was initiated with either intravenous or colonic infusion of crystalloid based on the Parkland formula. This treatment lasted 4.5 hours. The volume of fluid infused was 86 ± 18 ml/kg for the intravenous treatment and 89 ± 14 ml/kg for the colonic treatment. The percentage of fluid absorbed by the colon at the end of the protocol was 30 ± 13% of the infused fluid. Enteral resuscitation was equally effective in expanding plasma volume at the end of the protocol. Laboratorial and hemodynamic parameters were similar between the two resuscitation strategies throughout the study. Urine output was significantly higher in the intravenous group (7.9 ± 4.2 ml/kg/hr vs 0.9 ± 0.3 ml/kg/hr, P = .03). This study demonstrates that colonic infusion of normal saline in a severe burn injury model can restore hemodynamic stability and expand plasma volume to a degree that rivals the effect of direct intravenous infusion for early burn resuscitation in a swine model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055667439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055667439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jbcr/irx035

DO - 10.1093/jbcr/irx035

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85055667439

VL - 39

SP - 744

EP - 750

JO - Journal of Burn Care and Research

JF - Journal of Burn Care and Research

SN - 1559-047X

IS - 5

ER -