Effectiveness of diabetes mellitus screening recommendations

Florence J. Dallo, Susan Weller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Screening guidelines proposed by the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus have been endorsed by several medical societies. However, one-third of cases are undiagnosed, and complications at the time of diagnosis indicate that disease may have been present for several years before diagnosis. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the guidelines for detecting new cases of diabetes mellitus. By using a cross-sectional, representative sample of the United States (National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey, NHANES III), the guidelines are tested on adults, 20 years and older without a prior diagnosis of diabetes. Individuals are classified as nondiabetics (n = 6,241) or as having undiagnosed diabetes (n = 274) based on their blood glucose. Screening when one risk factor is present, as stated in the guidelines, has a true-positive rate of 100% and would require that 83% of the population be tested. Screening when two risk factors are present is more efficient, with a comparable true-positive rate (98%), but requires that only 59% of the population be tested. A notable finding is the earlier age of onset among minorities, which may be associated with other health disparities. Because diabetes occurs at younger ages in minorities, screening whites who are ≥40 and minorities ≥30 years of age has a high true-positive rate (95%) and also reduces testing (60%). The screening guidelines would be effective, if followed, and would essentially eliminate undiagnosed, cases of diabetes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)10574-10579
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume100
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2 2003

Fingerprint

Diabetes Mellitus
Guidelines
Nutrition Surveys
Medical Societies
Health
Age of Onset
Population
Blood Glucose

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • General

Cite this

Effectiveness of diabetes mellitus screening recommendations. / Dallo, Florence J.; Weller, Susan.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 100, No. 18, 02.09.2003, p. 10574-10579.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{09fa768c80274139a332b68313051420,
title = "Effectiveness of diabetes mellitus screening recommendations",
abstract = "Screening guidelines proposed by the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus have been endorsed by several medical societies. However, one-third of cases are undiagnosed, and complications at the time of diagnosis indicate that disease may have been present for several years before diagnosis. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the guidelines for detecting new cases of diabetes mellitus. By using a cross-sectional, representative sample of the United States (National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey, NHANES III), the guidelines are tested on adults, 20 years and older without a prior diagnosis of diabetes. Individuals are classified as nondiabetics (n = 6,241) or as having undiagnosed diabetes (n = 274) based on their blood glucose. Screening when one risk factor is present, as stated in the guidelines, has a true-positive rate of 100{\%} and would require that 83{\%} of the population be tested. Screening when two risk factors are present is more efficient, with a comparable true-positive rate (98{\%}), but requires that only 59{\%} of the population be tested. A notable finding is the earlier age of onset among minorities, which may be associated with other health disparities. Because diabetes occurs at younger ages in minorities, screening whites who are ≥40 and minorities ≥30 years of age has a high true-positive rate (95{\%}) and also reduces testing (60{\%}). The screening guidelines would be effective, if followed, and would essentially eliminate undiagnosed, cases of diabetes.",
author = "Dallo, {Florence J.} and Susan Weller",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1733839100",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "10574--10579",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "18",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of diabetes mellitus screening recommendations

AU - Dallo, Florence J.

AU - Weller, Susan

PY - 2003/9/2

Y1 - 2003/9/2

N2 - Screening guidelines proposed by the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus have been endorsed by several medical societies. However, one-third of cases are undiagnosed, and complications at the time of diagnosis indicate that disease may have been present for several years before diagnosis. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the guidelines for detecting new cases of diabetes mellitus. By using a cross-sectional, representative sample of the United States (National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey, NHANES III), the guidelines are tested on adults, 20 years and older without a prior diagnosis of diabetes. Individuals are classified as nondiabetics (n = 6,241) or as having undiagnosed diabetes (n = 274) based on their blood glucose. Screening when one risk factor is present, as stated in the guidelines, has a true-positive rate of 100% and would require that 83% of the population be tested. Screening when two risk factors are present is more efficient, with a comparable true-positive rate (98%), but requires that only 59% of the population be tested. A notable finding is the earlier age of onset among minorities, which may be associated with other health disparities. Because diabetes occurs at younger ages in minorities, screening whites who are ≥40 and minorities ≥30 years of age has a high true-positive rate (95%) and also reduces testing (60%). The screening guidelines would be effective, if followed, and would essentially eliminate undiagnosed, cases of diabetes.

AB - Screening guidelines proposed by the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus have been endorsed by several medical societies. However, one-third of cases are undiagnosed, and complications at the time of diagnosis indicate that disease may have been present for several years before diagnosis. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the guidelines for detecting new cases of diabetes mellitus. By using a cross-sectional, representative sample of the United States (National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey, NHANES III), the guidelines are tested on adults, 20 years and older without a prior diagnosis of diabetes. Individuals are classified as nondiabetics (n = 6,241) or as having undiagnosed diabetes (n = 274) based on their blood glucose. Screening when one risk factor is present, as stated in the guidelines, has a true-positive rate of 100% and would require that 83% of the population be tested. Screening when two risk factors are present is more efficient, with a comparable true-positive rate (98%), but requires that only 59% of the population be tested. A notable finding is the earlier age of onset among minorities, which may be associated with other health disparities. Because diabetes occurs at younger ages in minorities, screening whites who are ≥40 and minorities ≥30 years of age has a high true-positive rate (95%) and also reduces testing (60%). The screening guidelines would be effective, if followed, and would essentially eliminate undiagnosed, cases of diabetes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042838267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042838267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1733839100

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1733839100

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 10574

EP - 10579

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 18

ER -