TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of physical therapy interventions on post-stroke spasticity
T2 - An umbrella review
AU - Brusola, Gregory
AU - Garcia, Erica
AU - Albosta, Meagan
AU - Daly, Audrey
AU - Kafes, Konstandinos
AU - Furtado, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 - IOS Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - BACKGROUND: Post-stroke spasticity is often one of the primary impairments addressed in rehabilitation. However, limited guidance exists on the effectiveness of physical therapy (PT) interventions for post-stroke spasticity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of evidence of PT interventions for post-stroke spasticity. METHODS: Ovid (Medline), Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, PEDro, and PROSPERO were searched to identify reviews based on the following criteria: 1) published between 2012 and 2021, 2) participants older than 18 years old, 3) post-stroke spasticity, 4) PT interventions, 5) clinical or neurophysiological measures of spasticity as primary outcomes. Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 and the Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation assessed methodological quality. RESULTS: Eight articles were included in the analysis. No high-quality evidence was found. Moderate quality evidence exists for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, resistance training, and lower extremity ergometer training with or without functional electrical stimulation. Low quality evidence exists for dynamic stretching, botulinum toxin with constraint-induced movement therapy, and static stretching using positional orthoses. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that PT should prioritize a combination of active strategies over passive interventions, but further studies are needed prioritizing analyses of the movement system in managing post-stroke spasticity in conjunction with medical therapies.
AB - BACKGROUND: Post-stroke spasticity is often one of the primary impairments addressed in rehabilitation. However, limited guidance exists on the effectiveness of physical therapy (PT) interventions for post-stroke spasticity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of evidence of PT interventions for post-stroke spasticity. METHODS: Ovid (Medline), Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, PEDro, and PROSPERO were searched to identify reviews based on the following criteria: 1) published between 2012 and 2021, 2) participants older than 18 years old, 3) post-stroke spasticity, 4) PT interventions, 5) clinical or neurophysiological measures of spasticity as primary outcomes. Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 and the Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation assessed methodological quality. RESULTS: Eight articles were included in the analysis. No high-quality evidence was found. Moderate quality evidence exists for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, resistance training, and lower extremity ergometer training with or without functional electrical stimulation. Low quality evidence exists for dynamic stretching, botulinum toxin with constraint-induced movement therapy, and static stretching using positional orthoses. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that PT should prioritize a combination of active strategies over passive interventions, but further studies are needed prioritizing analyses of the movement system in managing post-stroke spasticity in conjunction with medical therapies.
KW - Muscle spasticity
KW - electric stimulation
KW - exercise
KW - physical therapy
KW - physical therapy modalities
KW - stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152632377&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85152632377&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3233/NRE-220275
DO - 10.3233/NRE-220275
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36806522
AN - SCOPUS:85152632377
SN - 1053-8135
VL - 52
SP - 349
EP - 363
JO - NeuroRehabilitation
JF - NeuroRehabilitation
IS - 3
ER -