Effects of level II fieldwork on clinical reasoning in occupational therapy

Marjorie E. Scaffa, Theresa M. Smith

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Objective. Fieldwork has been described as an educational method that enhances clinical reasoning skills. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of Level II fieldwork on the development of clinical reasoning skills of undergraduate occupational therapy students.

Method. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design was used with a convenience sample of 48 undergraduate seniors. All students participated in two 12-week, full-time rotations of Level II fieldwork. The Self-Assessment of Clinical Reflection and Reasoning (SACRR) developed by Royeen, Mu, Barrett and Luebben (2000) was administered the week before the students left for fieldwork and the first day after they returned from fieldwork.

Results. Paired t-tests revealed statistically significant differences in pretest and posttest scores for 13 of 26 items on the SACRR. In addition, the overall total score increased from 102.55 to 108.41 (p <.01).

Conclusion. The results suggest 24 weeks of full-time fieldwork experience, in the senior year of an undergraduate occupational therapy curriculum, can significantly facilitate the development of students’ clinical reasoning skills.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationBest Practices in Occupational Therapy Education
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages31-38
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)9780203049938
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Therapy
Undergraduate
Self-assessment
Pre-test
Curriculum
Education
T-test

Keywords

  • Clinical reasoning
  • Education
  • Fieldwork

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Scaffa, M. E., & Smith, T. M. (2012). Effects of level II fieldwork on clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. In Best Practices in Occupational Therapy Education (pp. 31-38). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203049938

Effects of level II fieldwork on clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. / Scaffa, Marjorie E.; Smith, Theresa M.

Best Practices in Occupational Therapy Education. Taylor and Francis, 2012. p. 31-38.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Scaffa, ME & Smith, TM 2012, Effects of level II fieldwork on clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. in Best Practices in Occupational Therapy Education. Taylor and Francis, pp. 31-38. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203049938
Scaffa ME, Smith TM. Effects of level II fieldwork on clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. In Best Practices in Occupational Therapy Education. Taylor and Francis. 2012. p. 31-38 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203049938
Scaffa, Marjorie E. ; Smith, Theresa M. / Effects of level II fieldwork on clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. Best Practices in Occupational Therapy Education. Taylor and Francis, 2012. pp. 31-38
@inbook{704d22dd428549159bf68f7fd9c6c616,
title = "Effects of level II fieldwork on clinical reasoning in occupational therapy",
abstract = "Objective. Fieldwork has been described as an educational method that enhances clinical reasoning skills. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of Level II fieldwork on the development of clinical reasoning skills of undergraduate occupational therapy students.Method. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design was used with a convenience sample of 48 undergraduate seniors. All students participated in two 12-week, full-time rotations of Level II fieldwork. The Self-Assessment of Clinical Reflection and Reasoning (SACRR) developed by Royeen, Mu, Barrett and Luebben (2000) was administered the week before the students left for fieldwork and the first day after they returned from fieldwork.Results. Paired t-tests revealed statistically significant differences in pretest and posttest scores for 13 of 26 items on the SACRR. In addition, the overall total score increased from 102.55 to 108.41 (p <.01).Conclusion. The results suggest 24 weeks of full-time fieldwork experience, in the senior year of an undergraduate occupational therapy curriculum, can significantly facilitate the development of students’ clinical reasoning skills.",
keywords = "Clinical reasoning, Education, Fieldwork",
author = "Scaffa, {Marjorie E.} and Smith, {Theresa M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9780203049938",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780203049938",
pages = "31--38",
booktitle = "Best Practices in Occupational Therapy Education",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Effects of level II fieldwork on clinical reasoning in occupational therapy

AU - Scaffa, Marjorie E.

AU - Smith, Theresa M.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Objective. Fieldwork has been described as an educational method that enhances clinical reasoning skills. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of Level II fieldwork on the development of clinical reasoning skills of undergraduate occupational therapy students.Method. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design was used with a convenience sample of 48 undergraduate seniors. All students participated in two 12-week, full-time rotations of Level II fieldwork. The Self-Assessment of Clinical Reflection and Reasoning (SACRR) developed by Royeen, Mu, Barrett and Luebben (2000) was administered the week before the students left for fieldwork and the first day after they returned from fieldwork.Results. Paired t-tests revealed statistically significant differences in pretest and posttest scores for 13 of 26 items on the SACRR. In addition, the overall total score increased from 102.55 to 108.41 (p <.01).Conclusion. The results suggest 24 weeks of full-time fieldwork experience, in the senior year of an undergraduate occupational therapy curriculum, can significantly facilitate the development of students’ clinical reasoning skills.

AB - Objective. Fieldwork has been described as an educational method that enhances clinical reasoning skills. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of Level II fieldwork on the development of clinical reasoning skills of undergraduate occupational therapy students.Method. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design was used with a convenience sample of 48 undergraduate seniors. All students participated in two 12-week, full-time rotations of Level II fieldwork. The Self-Assessment of Clinical Reflection and Reasoning (SACRR) developed by Royeen, Mu, Barrett and Luebben (2000) was administered the week before the students left for fieldwork and the first day after they returned from fieldwork.Results. Paired t-tests revealed statistically significant differences in pretest and posttest scores for 13 of 26 items on the SACRR. In addition, the overall total score increased from 102.55 to 108.41 (p <.01).Conclusion. The results suggest 24 weeks of full-time fieldwork experience, in the senior year of an undergraduate occupational therapy curriculum, can significantly facilitate the development of students’ clinical reasoning skills.

KW - Clinical reasoning

KW - Education

KW - Fieldwork

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921577716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921577716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9780203049938

DO - 10.4324/9780203049938

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84921577716

SN - 9780203049938

SP - 31

EP - 38

BT - Best Practices in Occupational Therapy Education

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -