Effects of retained diaphyseal plates on forearm bone density and grip strength.

Ronald Lindsey, A. T. Fenison, B. J. Doherty, P. Law, A. LeBlanc

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Numerous complications have been attributed to elective plate removal following successful treatment of both bone diaphyseal forearm fractures, yet the effects of retained implants are not known. Fourteen patients were reviewed for residual forearm grip strength (FGS) and bone mineral density (BMD) following uneventful union. Patients were analyzed in two groups based upon time from fixation: group I, > 2 years but < or = 5 years, and group II, > 5 years. In group I, mean 2.6 years follow-up (n = 6), mean FGS ratios (patient values/age matched general population means) were 0.65 and 0.77, respectively, for plated and normal limbs (p = 0.08). The mean BMD ratios of plated/normal sides adjacent to the plate were 0.99 (ulna) and 1.02 (radius); these values were not significantly different from more proximal forearm BMD ratios (p = 0.92 ulna; p = 0.44, radius). In group II, mean 8.4 years (n = 8), mean FGS ratios were 0.97 and 1.09, respectively, for plated and normal limbs (p > 0.05). The BMD ratio was 1.04 adjacent to the plate; this was not significantly different from the ratios measured away from the plate (p > 0.4). We conclude that retained forearm plates can be well tolerated and that their routine removal is not indicated based on FGS or BMD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)462-467
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Volume8
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hand Strength
Forearm
Bone Density
Ulna
Extremities
Bone and Bones
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Lindsey, R., Fenison, A. T., Doherty, B. J., Law, P., & LeBlanc, A. (1994). Effects of retained diaphyseal plates on forearm bone density and grip strength. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 8(6), 462-467.

Effects of retained diaphyseal plates on forearm bone density and grip strength. / Lindsey, Ronald; Fenison, A. T.; Doherty, B. J.; Law, P.; LeBlanc, A.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 8, No. 6, 12.1994, p. 462-467.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lindsey, R, Fenison, AT, Doherty, BJ, Law, P & LeBlanc, A 1994, 'Effects of retained diaphyseal plates on forearm bone density and grip strength.', Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 462-467.
Lindsey, Ronald ; Fenison, A. T. ; Doherty, B. J. ; Law, P. ; LeBlanc, A. / Effects of retained diaphyseal plates on forearm bone density and grip strength. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 1994 ; Vol. 8, No. 6. pp. 462-467.
@article{cb2c6bc068f44ff78fea7d739450e0c0,
title = "Effects of retained diaphyseal plates on forearm bone density and grip strength.",
abstract = "Numerous complications have been attributed to elective plate removal following successful treatment of both bone diaphyseal forearm fractures, yet the effects of retained implants are not known. Fourteen patients were reviewed for residual forearm grip strength (FGS) and bone mineral density (BMD) following uneventful union. Patients were analyzed in two groups based upon time from fixation: group I, > 2 years but < or = 5 years, and group II, > 5 years. In group I, mean 2.6 years follow-up (n = 6), mean FGS ratios (patient values/age matched general population means) were 0.65 and 0.77, respectively, for plated and normal limbs (p = 0.08). The mean BMD ratios of plated/normal sides adjacent to the plate were 0.99 (ulna) and 1.02 (radius); these values were not significantly different from more proximal forearm BMD ratios (p = 0.92 ulna; p = 0.44, radius). In group II, mean 8.4 years (n = 8), mean FGS ratios were 0.97 and 1.09, respectively, for plated and normal limbs (p > 0.05). The BMD ratio was 1.04 adjacent to the plate; this was not significantly different from the ratios measured away from the plate (p > 0.4). We conclude that retained forearm plates can be well tolerated and that their routine removal is not indicated based on FGS or BMD.",
author = "Ronald Lindsey and Fenison, {A. T.} and Doherty, {B. J.} and P. Law and A. LeBlanc",
year = "1994",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "462--467",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma",
issn = "0890-5339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of retained diaphyseal plates on forearm bone density and grip strength.

AU - Lindsey, Ronald

AU - Fenison, A. T.

AU - Doherty, B. J.

AU - Law, P.

AU - LeBlanc, A.

PY - 1994/12

Y1 - 1994/12

N2 - Numerous complications have been attributed to elective plate removal following successful treatment of both bone diaphyseal forearm fractures, yet the effects of retained implants are not known. Fourteen patients were reviewed for residual forearm grip strength (FGS) and bone mineral density (BMD) following uneventful union. Patients were analyzed in two groups based upon time from fixation: group I, > 2 years but < or = 5 years, and group II, > 5 years. In group I, mean 2.6 years follow-up (n = 6), mean FGS ratios (patient values/age matched general population means) were 0.65 and 0.77, respectively, for plated and normal limbs (p = 0.08). The mean BMD ratios of plated/normal sides adjacent to the plate were 0.99 (ulna) and 1.02 (radius); these values were not significantly different from more proximal forearm BMD ratios (p = 0.92 ulna; p = 0.44, radius). In group II, mean 8.4 years (n = 8), mean FGS ratios were 0.97 and 1.09, respectively, for plated and normal limbs (p > 0.05). The BMD ratio was 1.04 adjacent to the plate; this was not significantly different from the ratios measured away from the plate (p > 0.4). We conclude that retained forearm plates can be well tolerated and that their routine removal is not indicated based on FGS or BMD.

AB - Numerous complications have been attributed to elective plate removal following successful treatment of both bone diaphyseal forearm fractures, yet the effects of retained implants are not known. Fourteen patients were reviewed for residual forearm grip strength (FGS) and bone mineral density (BMD) following uneventful union. Patients were analyzed in two groups based upon time from fixation: group I, > 2 years but < or = 5 years, and group II, > 5 years. In group I, mean 2.6 years follow-up (n = 6), mean FGS ratios (patient values/age matched general population means) were 0.65 and 0.77, respectively, for plated and normal limbs (p = 0.08). The mean BMD ratios of plated/normal sides adjacent to the plate were 0.99 (ulna) and 1.02 (radius); these values were not significantly different from more proximal forearm BMD ratios (p = 0.92 ulna; p = 0.44, radius). In group II, mean 8.4 years (n = 8), mean FGS ratios were 0.97 and 1.09, respectively, for plated and normal limbs (p > 0.05). The BMD ratio was 1.04 adjacent to the plate; this was not significantly different from the ratios measured away from the plate (p > 0.4). We conclude that retained forearm plates can be well tolerated and that their routine removal is not indicated based on FGS or BMD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028724324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028724324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7869159

AN - SCOPUS:0028724324

VL - 8

SP - 462

EP - 467

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

SN - 0890-5339

IS - 6

ER -