TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of variable versus nonvariable controlled mechanical ventilation on pulmonary inflammation in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome in pigs
AU - Wittenstein, Jakob
AU - Scharffenberg, Martin
AU - Braune, Anja
AU - Huhle, Robert
AU - Bluth, Thomas
AU - Herzog, Moritz
AU - Güldner, Andreas
AU - Ball, Lorenzo
AU - Simonassi, Francesca
AU - Zeidler-Rentzsch, Ines
AU - Vidal Melo, Marcos F.
AU - Koch, Thea
AU - Rocco, Patricia R.M.
AU - Pelosi, Paolo
AU - Kotzerke, Jörg
AU - Gama de Abreu, Marcelo
AU - Kiss, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 British Journal of Anaesthesia
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - Background: Mechanical ventilation with variable tidal volumes (VT) may improve lung function and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, previous investigations were limited to less than 6 h, and control groups did not follow clinical standards. We hypothesised that 24 h of mechanical ventilation with variable VT reduces pulmonary inflammation (as reflected by neutrophil infiltration), compared with standard protective, nonvariable ventilation. Methods: Experimental ARDS was induced in 14 anaesthetised pigs with saline lung lavage followed by injurious mechanical ventilation. Pigs (n=7 per group) were randomly assigned to using variable VT or nonvariable VT modes of mechanical ventilation for 24 h. In both groups, ventilator settings including positive end-expiratory pressure and oxygen inspiratory fraction were adjusted according to the ARDS Network protocol. Pulmonary inflammation (primary endpoint) and perfusion were assessed by positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose and 68Gallium (68Ga)-labelled microspheres, respectively. Gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and haemodynamics were quantified. Lung aeration was determined using CT. Results: The specific global uptake rate of 18F-FDG increased to a similar extent regardless of mode of mechanical ventilation (median uptake for variable VT=0.016 min−1 [inter-quartile range, 0.012–0.029] compared with median uptake for nonvariable VT=0.037 min−1 [0.008–0.053]; P=0.406). Gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, haemodynamics, and lung aeration and perfusion were similar in both variable and nonvariable VT ventilatory modes. Conclusion: In a porcine model of ARDS, 24 h of mechanical ventilation with variable VT did not attenuate pulmonary inflammation compared with standard protective mechanical ventilation with nonvariable VT.
AB - Background: Mechanical ventilation with variable tidal volumes (VT) may improve lung function and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, previous investigations were limited to less than 6 h, and control groups did not follow clinical standards. We hypothesised that 24 h of mechanical ventilation with variable VT reduces pulmonary inflammation (as reflected by neutrophil infiltration), compared with standard protective, nonvariable ventilation. Methods: Experimental ARDS was induced in 14 anaesthetised pigs with saline lung lavage followed by injurious mechanical ventilation. Pigs (n=7 per group) were randomly assigned to using variable VT or nonvariable VT modes of mechanical ventilation for 24 h. In both groups, ventilator settings including positive end-expiratory pressure and oxygen inspiratory fraction were adjusted according to the ARDS Network protocol. Pulmonary inflammation (primary endpoint) and perfusion were assessed by positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose and 68Gallium (68Ga)-labelled microspheres, respectively. Gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and haemodynamics were quantified. Lung aeration was determined using CT. Results: The specific global uptake rate of 18F-FDG increased to a similar extent regardless of mode of mechanical ventilation (median uptake for variable VT=0.016 min−1 [inter-quartile range, 0.012–0.029] compared with median uptake for nonvariable VT=0.037 min−1 [0.008–0.053]; P=0.406). Gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, haemodynamics, and lung aeration and perfusion were similar in both variable and nonvariable VT ventilatory modes. Conclusion: In a porcine model of ARDS, 24 h of mechanical ventilation with variable VT did not attenuate pulmonary inflammation compared with standard protective mechanical ventilation with nonvariable VT.
KW - ARDS
KW - mechanical ventilation
KW - positron emission tomography
KW - pulmonary neutrophilic inflammation
KW - variable ventilation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078909380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078909380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.040
DO - 10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.040
M3 - Article
C2 - 32033744
AN - SCOPUS:85078909380
SN - 0007-0912
VL - 124
SP - 430
EP - 439
JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia
JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia
IS - 4
ER -