TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of paroxetine in the treatment of adolescent major depression
T2 - A randomized, controlled trial
AU - Keller, Martin B.
AU - Ryan, Neal D.
AU - Strober, Michael
AU - Klein, Rachel G.
AU - Kutcher, Stan P.
AU - Birmaher, Boris
AU - Hagino, Owen R.
AU - Koplewicz, Harold
AU - Carlson, Gabrielle A.
AU - Clarke, Gregory N.
AU - Emslie, Grahm J.
AU - Feinberg, David
AU - Geller, Barbara
AU - Kusumakar, Vivek
AU - Papatheodorou, George
AU - Sack, William H.
AU - Sweeney, Michael
AU - Wagner, Karen Dineen
AU - Weller, Elizabeth B.
AU - Winters, Nancy C.
AU - Oakes, Rosemary
AU - McCafferty, James P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by a grant from GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA. The authors acknowledge the contributions of the following individuals: Jill M. Abbott, Ellen Basian, Ph.D., Carolyn Boulos, M.D., Elyse Dubo, M.D., Mary A. Fristad, Ph.D., Joan Hebeler, M.D., Kevin Kelly, Ph.D., Sharon Reiter, M.D., and Ronald A. Weller, M.D. Editorial assistance was provided by Sally K. Laden, M.S.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Objective: To compare paroxetine with placebo and imipramine with placebo for the treatment of adolescent depression. Method: After a 7- to 14-day screening period, 275 adolescents with major depression began 8 weeks of double-blind paroxetine (20-40 mg), imipramine (gradual upward titration to 200-300 mg), or placebo. The two primary outcome measures were endpoint response (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D] score ≤8 or ≥50% reduction in baseline HAM-D) and change from baseline HAM-D score. Other depression-related variables were (1) HAM-D depressed mood item; (2) depression item of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for Adolescents-Lifetime version (K-SADS-L); (3) Clinical Global Impression (CGI) improvement scores of 1 or 2; (4) nine-item depression subscale of K-SADS-L; and (5) mean CGI improvement scores. Results: Paroxetine demonstrated significantly greater improvement compared with placebo in HAM-D total score ≤8, HAM-D depressed mood item, K-SADS-L depressed mood item, and CGI score of 1 or 2. The response to imipramine was not significantly different from placebo for any measure. Neither paroxetine nor imipramine differed significantly from placebo on parent- or self-rating measures. Withdrawal rates for adverse effects were 9.7% and 6.9% for paroxetine and placebo, respectively. Of 31.5% of subjects stopping imipramine therapy because of adverse effects, nearly one third did so because of adverse cardiovascular effects. Conclusions: Paroxetine is generally well tolerated and effective for major depression in adolescents.
AB - Objective: To compare paroxetine with placebo and imipramine with placebo for the treatment of adolescent depression. Method: After a 7- to 14-day screening period, 275 adolescents with major depression began 8 weeks of double-blind paroxetine (20-40 mg), imipramine (gradual upward titration to 200-300 mg), or placebo. The two primary outcome measures were endpoint response (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D] score ≤8 or ≥50% reduction in baseline HAM-D) and change from baseline HAM-D score. Other depression-related variables were (1) HAM-D depressed mood item; (2) depression item of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for Adolescents-Lifetime version (K-SADS-L); (3) Clinical Global Impression (CGI) improvement scores of 1 or 2; (4) nine-item depression subscale of K-SADS-L; and (5) mean CGI improvement scores. Results: Paroxetine demonstrated significantly greater improvement compared with placebo in HAM-D total score ≤8, HAM-D depressed mood item, K-SADS-L depressed mood item, and CGI score of 1 or 2. The response to imipramine was not significantly different from placebo for any measure. Neither paroxetine nor imipramine differed significantly from placebo on parent- or self-rating measures. Withdrawal rates for adverse effects were 9.7% and 6.9% for paroxetine and placebo, respectively. Of 31.5% of subjects stopping imipramine therapy because of adverse effects, nearly one third did so because of adverse cardiovascular effects. Conclusions: Paroxetine is generally well tolerated and effective for major depression in adolescents.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Imipramine
KW - Major depression
KW - Paroxetine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034961468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034961468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00004583-200107000-00010
DO - 10.1097/00004583-200107000-00010
M3 - Article
C2 - 11437014
AN - SCOPUS:0034961468
SN - 0890-8567
VL - 40
SP - 762
EP - 772
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
IS - 7
ER -