Elective versus emergency surgery for ulcerative colitis

A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis

Supriya S. Patel, Madhukar S. Patel, Melanie Goldfarb, Adrian Ortega, Glenn T. Ault, Andreas M. Kaiser, Anthony J. Senagore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: It is unclear whether advances in the medical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) have altered outcomes for medically intractable disease. Therefore, it is essential to understand the current impact of elective versus emergency surgery for UC. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to compare outcomes for elective versus emergency UC surgery between 2005 and 2010. Results: Four thousand nine hundred sixty-two patients were eligible for study (94% elective and 6% emergent). Emergency surgery patients were significantly older and frequently underwent open surgery. Emergency cases were associated with a higher frequency of cardiac, pulmonary, and renal comorbidities; postoperative complications; longer hospital stays; and higher rates of return to the operating room. Conclusions: In the era of advanced UC medical therapy, the need for emergency surgery still exists and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Data are needed to determine if earlier selection of surgery would be beneficial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-338
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume205
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Ulcerative Colitis
Emergencies
Emergency Treatment
Operating Rooms
Comorbidity
Length of Stay
Databases
Morbidity
Kidney
Lung
Mortality

Keywords

  • Elective
  • Emergency
  • Medical therapy
  • Surgery
  • Ulcerative colitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Patel, S. S., Patel, M. S., Goldfarb, M., Ortega, A., Ault, G. T., Kaiser, A. M., & Senagore, A. J. (2013). Elective versus emergency surgery for ulcerative colitis: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. American Journal of Surgery, 205(3), 333-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.014

Elective versus emergency surgery for ulcerative colitis : A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. / Patel, Supriya S.; Patel, Madhukar S.; Goldfarb, Melanie; Ortega, Adrian; Ault, Glenn T.; Kaiser, Andreas M.; Senagore, Anthony J.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 205, No. 3, 03.2013, p. 333-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patel, SS, Patel, MS, Goldfarb, M, Ortega, A, Ault, GT, Kaiser, AM & Senagore, AJ 2013, 'Elective versus emergency surgery for ulcerative colitis: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis', American Journal of Surgery, vol. 205, no. 3, pp. 333-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.014
Patel, Supriya S. ; Patel, Madhukar S. ; Goldfarb, Melanie ; Ortega, Adrian ; Ault, Glenn T. ; Kaiser, Andreas M. ; Senagore, Anthony J. / Elective versus emergency surgery for ulcerative colitis : A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 205, No. 3. pp. 333-338.
@article{b30a7accdb514609bec2ab116b428f0b,
title = "Elective versus emergency surgery for ulcerative colitis: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis",
abstract = "Background: It is unclear whether advances in the medical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) have altered outcomes for medically intractable disease. Therefore, it is essential to understand the current impact of elective versus emergency surgery for UC. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to compare outcomes for elective versus emergency UC surgery between 2005 and 2010. Results: Four thousand nine hundred sixty-two patients were eligible for study (94{\%} elective and 6{\%} emergent). Emergency surgery patients were significantly older and frequently underwent open surgery. Emergency cases were associated with a higher frequency of cardiac, pulmonary, and renal comorbidities; postoperative complications; longer hospital stays; and higher rates of return to the operating room. Conclusions: In the era of advanced UC medical therapy, the need for emergency surgery still exists and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Data are needed to determine if earlier selection of surgery would be beneficial.",
keywords = "Elective, Emergency, Medical therapy, Surgery, Ulcerative colitis",
author = "Patel, {Supriya S.} and Patel, {Madhukar S.} and Melanie Goldfarb and Adrian Ortega and Ault, {Glenn T.} and Kaiser, {Andreas M.} and Senagore, {Anthony J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "205",
pages = "333--338",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Elective versus emergency surgery for ulcerative colitis

T2 - A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis

AU - Patel, Supriya S.

AU - Patel, Madhukar S.

AU - Goldfarb, Melanie

AU - Ortega, Adrian

AU - Ault, Glenn T.

AU - Kaiser, Andreas M.

AU - Senagore, Anthony J.

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Background: It is unclear whether advances in the medical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) have altered outcomes for medically intractable disease. Therefore, it is essential to understand the current impact of elective versus emergency surgery for UC. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to compare outcomes for elective versus emergency UC surgery between 2005 and 2010. Results: Four thousand nine hundred sixty-two patients were eligible for study (94% elective and 6% emergent). Emergency surgery patients were significantly older and frequently underwent open surgery. Emergency cases were associated with a higher frequency of cardiac, pulmonary, and renal comorbidities; postoperative complications; longer hospital stays; and higher rates of return to the operating room. Conclusions: In the era of advanced UC medical therapy, the need for emergency surgery still exists and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Data are needed to determine if earlier selection of surgery would be beneficial.

AB - Background: It is unclear whether advances in the medical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) have altered outcomes for medically intractable disease. Therefore, it is essential to understand the current impact of elective versus emergency surgery for UC. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to compare outcomes for elective versus emergency UC surgery between 2005 and 2010. Results: Four thousand nine hundred sixty-two patients were eligible for study (94% elective and 6% emergent). Emergency surgery patients were significantly older and frequently underwent open surgery. Emergency cases were associated with a higher frequency of cardiac, pulmonary, and renal comorbidities; postoperative complications; longer hospital stays; and higher rates of return to the operating room. Conclusions: In the era of advanced UC medical therapy, the need for emergency surgery still exists and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Data are needed to determine if earlier selection of surgery would be beneficial.

KW - Elective

KW - Emergency

KW - Medical therapy

KW - Surgery

KW - Ulcerative colitis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874116277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874116277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.014

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.014

M3 - Article

VL - 205

SP - 333

EP - 338

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 3

ER -