Enhanced recovery protocol

Implementation at a county institution with limited resources

Kais Rona, J. Choi, G. Sigle, S. Kidd, G. Ault, A. J. Senagore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The benefits of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) in colorectal surgery have been well described; however, data on the implementation process is minimal, especially in a resource-limited institution. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes during implementation of a physician-driven ERP at a public-funded institution. We retrospectively reviewed all elective colorectal surgery during a transition from standard care to an ERP (implemented via a standard order sheet). Data regarding use of care plan, length of stay (LOS), and rates of postoperative complications and readmission were recorded. One hundred eleven patients were included in the study; however, complete use of the ERP after its introduction occurred in a total of 50 patients for a compliance rate of 60 per cent (95% confidence interval [CI], 49 to 70). Late implementation of ERP diet, analgesics, and activity were the most common process errors. Full application of the ERP reduced mean LOS by 3 days (P = 0.002), and there was a trend toward decreased postoperative morbidity without an increase in readmission rate (P = 0.61). Full implementation of an ERP for colorectal surgery faces many challenges in a resource-limited county institution; however, when fully applied, the ERP safely reduced overall LOS, which is important in cost containment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1041-1044
Number of pages4
JournalThe American surgeon
Volume78
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colorectal Surgery
Length of Stay
Cost Control
Patient Compliance
Analgesics
Confidence Intervals
Diet
Morbidity
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Rona, K., Choi, J., Sigle, G., Kidd, S., Ault, G., & Senagore, A. J. (2012). Enhanced recovery protocol: Implementation at a county institution with limited resources. The American surgeon, 78(10), 1041-1044.

Enhanced recovery protocol : Implementation at a county institution with limited resources. / Rona, Kais; Choi, J.; Sigle, G.; Kidd, S.; Ault, G.; Senagore, A. J.

In: The American surgeon, Vol. 78, No. 10, 10.2012, p. 1041-1044.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rona, K, Choi, J, Sigle, G, Kidd, S, Ault, G & Senagore, AJ 2012, 'Enhanced recovery protocol: Implementation at a county institution with limited resources', The American surgeon, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 1041-1044.
Rona K, Choi J, Sigle G, Kidd S, Ault G, Senagore AJ. Enhanced recovery protocol: Implementation at a county institution with limited resources. The American surgeon. 2012 Oct;78(10):1041-1044.
Rona, Kais ; Choi, J. ; Sigle, G. ; Kidd, S. ; Ault, G. ; Senagore, A. J. / Enhanced recovery protocol : Implementation at a county institution with limited resources. In: The American surgeon. 2012 ; Vol. 78, No. 10. pp. 1041-1044.
@article{1fdab37807e54d1a9a2ae460ba39a154,
title = "Enhanced recovery protocol: Implementation at a county institution with limited resources",
abstract = "The benefits of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) in colorectal surgery have been well described; however, data on the implementation process is minimal, especially in a resource-limited institution. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes during implementation of a physician-driven ERP at a public-funded institution. We retrospectively reviewed all elective colorectal surgery during a transition from standard care to an ERP (implemented via a standard order sheet). Data regarding use of care plan, length of stay (LOS), and rates of postoperative complications and readmission were recorded. One hundred eleven patients were included in the study; however, complete use of the ERP after its introduction occurred in a total of 50 patients for a compliance rate of 60 per cent (95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 49 to 70). Late implementation of ERP diet, analgesics, and activity were the most common process errors. Full application of the ERP reduced mean LOS by 3 days (P = 0.002), and there was a trend toward decreased postoperative morbidity without an increase in readmission rate (P = 0.61). Full implementation of an ERP for colorectal surgery faces many challenges in a resource-limited county institution; however, when fully applied, the ERP safely reduced overall LOS, which is important in cost containment.",
author = "Kais Rona and J. Choi and G. Sigle and S. Kidd and G. Ault and Senagore, {A. J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "1041--1044",
journal = "The American surgeon",
issn = "0003-1348",
publisher = "Southeastern Surgical Congress",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhanced recovery protocol

T2 - Implementation at a county institution with limited resources

AU - Rona, Kais

AU - Choi, J.

AU - Sigle, G.

AU - Kidd, S.

AU - Ault, G.

AU - Senagore, A. J.

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - The benefits of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) in colorectal surgery have been well described; however, data on the implementation process is minimal, especially in a resource-limited institution. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes during implementation of a physician-driven ERP at a public-funded institution. We retrospectively reviewed all elective colorectal surgery during a transition from standard care to an ERP (implemented via a standard order sheet). Data regarding use of care plan, length of stay (LOS), and rates of postoperative complications and readmission were recorded. One hundred eleven patients were included in the study; however, complete use of the ERP after its introduction occurred in a total of 50 patients for a compliance rate of 60 per cent (95% confidence interval [CI], 49 to 70). Late implementation of ERP diet, analgesics, and activity were the most common process errors. Full application of the ERP reduced mean LOS by 3 days (P = 0.002), and there was a trend toward decreased postoperative morbidity without an increase in readmission rate (P = 0.61). Full implementation of an ERP for colorectal surgery faces many challenges in a resource-limited county institution; however, when fully applied, the ERP safely reduced overall LOS, which is important in cost containment.

AB - The benefits of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) in colorectal surgery have been well described; however, data on the implementation process is minimal, especially in a resource-limited institution. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes during implementation of a physician-driven ERP at a public-funded institution. We retrospectively reviewed all elective colorectal surgery during a transition from standard care to an ERP (implemented via a standard order sheet). Data regarding use of care plan, length of stay (LOS), and rates of postoperative complications and readmission were recorded. One hundred eleven patients were included in the study; however, complete use of the ERP after its introduction occurred in a total of 50 patients for a compliance rate of 60 per cent (95% confidence interval [CI], 49 to 70). Late implementation of ERP diet, analgesics, and activity were the most common process errors. Full application of the ERP reduced mean LOS by 3 days (P = 0.002), and there was a trend toward decreased postoperative morbidity without an increase in readmission rate (P = 0.61). Full implementation of an ERP for colorectal surgery faces many challenges in a resource-limited county institution; however, when fully applied, the ERP safely reduced overall LOS, which is important in cost containment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866763348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866763348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 1041

EP - 1044

JO - The American surgeon

JF - The American surgeon

SN - 0003-1348

IS - 10

ER -