Erratum: The postcoital test in the development of new vaginal contraceptives (Biology of Reproduction (2020) 103:2 (437–444) DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioaa099)

Christine K. Mauck, Kathleen L. Vincent

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

In the original version of the article, a correction in Table 2 was inadvertently missed. The text for the ACIDFORM gel previously read as "13.7% [42] (n=1183) (7-cycle cumulative typical-use pregnancy rate or Food andDrug Administration (FDA) reviewed.Amphorawas applied 0-60 min before coitus.)". However, the correct text is "13.7% [42] (n=1183) (7-cycle cumulative typical-use pregnancy rate). Amphora was applied 0-60 min before coitus". The correct version of Table 2 appears online now. The publisher apologizes for this error.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)908
Number of pages1
JournalBiology of reproduction
Volume103
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Cell Biology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: The postcoital test in the development of new vaginal contraceptives (Biology of Reproduction (2020) 103:2 (437–444) DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioaa099)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this