Abstract
In the published study, "Does Postoperative Glenoid Retroversion Affect the 2-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?" the total number of nonretroverted glenoids reported in the Revisions section of the paper is incorrect. The sentence should read: "The percentage of TSAs revised was not worse for the retroverted glenoids (0 of 21 [0%]) than the percentage for the nonretroverted glenoids (three of 50 [6%])." The authors apologize for the error.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2277 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Clinical orthopaedics and related research |
| Volume | 476 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Nov 1 2018 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to: Does postoperative glenoid retroversion affect the 2-year clinical and radiographic outcomes for total shoulder arthroplasty? (Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research DOI: 10.1007/s11999-017-5433-3)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS